Another concealed carry owner doing the wrong thing

[Brain357]

You are getting difficult to take seriously. Yes people die in war. If Russia invades Ukraine that is not tyranny.

Again your house is burning but you are worried about getting hit by lightning the next time you go out. Makes no sense.

Nor can you say why so many countries without guns don't have these problems.

Mexico...Rwanda...Kenya...Detroit, the modern nations in the West have institutions that insulate them right now...but again...the world changes...Russia is moving again...you don't think atrocities are being committed in Ukraine in Russian occupied areas...?

You would guarantee that genocide will never happen again...ever...anywhere in the modern West....

 

[2aguy]

Yes people die in war

You have yet to show that genocide cannot happen...it took Germany 20 years to change to a place where it did happen...and at the time it was a modern nation state...Russia, murdered 25 million of it's people...China...75 million...you could say guns and socialism don't mix...

 

[Brain357]

What percent chance do you give this genocide of happening during your lifetime?

How do you see it happening? I think our military are the best we have. They would not turn on the people. In this age of 24 hour news, the internet, and cell phones they wouldn't be fooled either. Its rather insulting actually that you think they would do this.

Your examples are still extremely weak btw.

Yes people die in war

You have yet to show that genocide cannot happen...it took Germany 20 years to change to a place where it did happen...and at the time it was a modern nation state...Russia, murdered 25 million of it's people...China...75 million...you could say guns and socialism don't mix...

 

[turtledude]

That is cute. Then you must believe I go out without a gun all the time. Yet I still live. Crazy huh?

I don't believe your claims that you have guns. Its the Ben and Jerry seminar tactic

lots of people who don't wear seat belts are still alive too

 

[jon_berzerk]

Yes I do. We have restricted machine guns. You can't go out and buy a brand new 2014 full auto gun now can you? You can't own a gun if you are felon. These things just make sense and so does a magazine capacity limit.

Later "Brain"

you need to start thinking a bit more. you seem to think millions of honest people need to be restricted from OWNING something because a CRIMINAL might MISUSE it


smart people punish MISUSE

stupid people want to pass law restricting ownership on everyone

You can't go out and buy a brand new 2014 full auto gun now can you?

well actually you can

Q: How can an individual legally acquire NFA firearms?
Basically, there are 2 ways that an individual (who is not prohibited by Federal, State, or local law from receiving or possessing firearms) may legally acquire NFA firearms:

1. By transfer after approval by ATF of a registered weapon from its lawful owner residing in the same State as the transferee.
2. By obtaining prior approval from ATF to make NFA firearms.

[27 CFR 479.62-66 and 479.84-86]

only if that gun had been registered BEFORE May 19, 1986. So yeah, if you can find a "new" gun made BEFORE May 19, 1986 that had been registered by its owner, then you can buy it.

YOU CANNOT BUY ONE MADE AFTER THAT DATE UNLESS YOU are a CLASS THREE DEALER WITH A POLICE REQUEST LETTER

not necessarily

although i do agree that currently you need to be a manufacture of said type of firearm

which ATF has various applications for

ever read United States v. Dalton



interesting take on post 1986 ban

this decision still stand today

as well as U. S. v. Rock Island Armory

United States v. Dalton 960 F.2d 121 10th Cir. 1992

 

[turtledude]

the NFA and the Hughes Amendment are an affront to the constitution

 

[jon_berzerk]

the NFA and the Hughes Amendment are an affront to the constitution

agreed more so how it was slipped in on a voice vote

 

[turtledude]

the NFA and the Hughes Amendment are an affront to the constitution

agreed more so how it was slipped in on a voice vote

the dishonesty of the Dems who ran both houses at the time

 

[jon_berzerk]

the NFA and the Hughes Amendment are an affront to the constitution

agreed more so how it was slipped in on a voice vote

the dishonesty of the Dems who ran both houses at the time

nothing has changed over the years in that regard