Another Attractive Conservative - Christine O'Donnell

She is attractive. So what? We aren't electing people to look at them. If that was the case that inez sainz woman would probably be winning an election since she is the popular attractive person this week. Tomorrow it would be someone else.

So far I hear that Ms. Christine O'Donnell is stupid. No evidence provided. That she is wacko. No evidence provided.

Isn't it funny how everyone who doesn't follow the liberal/progressive agenda is stupid/insane and has no chance to win?

You never hear anything about liberal/progressive candidate being stupid/insane do you?

How about, she's a fucking liar? Does that count?

Evidence provided:


Now that Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP Senate primary in Delaware, Democrats will definitely retain Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. It’s not because O’Donnell is too conservative — it’s because of her numerous and serious personal issues.

(For those seeking specifics, there are plenty.

•Her lawsuit against ISI for “mental anguish” is exhibit A. It even contains an apparent lie about her seeking a Master’s Degree at Princeton.
•Exhibit B is her lies about having a college degree all these years — and no, she didn’t simply finish paying loans, as she implies. People who take student loans use them to pay their schools, and they get their degrees. She did not until 20 years later.
•Exhibit C is the fact that she has no apparent income, then she admitted to John McCormack that she has concealed income by leaving it off her financial disclosures.
•Exhibit D is the fact that she appears to be paying her personal rent with her campaign money, which is completely illegal.
•Exhibit E is the question about whether O’Donnell’s home was foreclosed. These three points suggest we have a grifter who understands conservative rhetoric.
•Exhibit F is her false claims that she “tied” or “beat” Joe Biden in two counties in 2008.
•Exhibit G is her campaign’s assertion that Scott Rasmussen is a tool of Mike Castle’s campaign.
•Exhibit H is her campaign’s deliberate stoking of rumors that Mike Castle would switch parties or has cut a deal with the Biden family to hand the seat over to Beau Biden in four years.
•Exhibit I is her former campaign staff’s video accusing Mike Castle (baselessly) of a homosexual affair, followed by O’Donnell calling him “unmanly.”
•Exhibit J is her paranoia over who’s hiding in the bushes and vandalizing her house.
•Exhibit K…well, you get the picture.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

obie wan is a fucking liar, you don't have a problem with that? what izzz it, cause she's white a woman and a Republican, you racist peice o shit.
 
Cluephone for Liability (hey man, it's been awhile). The article was written by a conservative, David Freddoso, who used to write for the National Review. Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Dickless: Thanks for sharing information I didn't ask for or need. And the point of "who" wrote that bullshit is what?

That because it was written by some alleged "conservative" that it's now accurate?

It already has been proved to be less than accurate, dipshit.

Your fallacy based (suppressed) premise is an undisguised appeal to authority, but the fact that the article says shit which the person quoting it didn't bother to check was the pint I was making.

You really are one clueless motherfucker, dickless. :lol:

I'm not the fucking moron who claimed it was written by a liberal. You're the idiot who didn't have a clue that the charges were penned by a wingnut.

Your inability to grasp the meaning of simple written words, Dickless Tucker is amusing.

Again, you simpleton, I was making reference not to the original author of that litany of accusations, but the special Board guest who elected to share it here.

Do try to keep up, dickless.
 
So, the point of making such a post in the "politics" forum was........?

I think it might have been a trap to get one of you goobers to tell us how "lovely" Shrillary Clinton is.

:lol:
Christine O'Donnell would have to stand on her Mother's shoulders, to kiss Hillary Clinton's ass.

She wouldn't even qualify as a Rookie, compared to Hillary Clinton. :rolleyes:

No comparison.....​

"O'Donnell rose to national attention in the 1990s as a social conservative, appearing on shows like Bill Maher's "Politically Incorrect" to campaign against pornography and masturbation."

Pfft. The discussion was not about qualifications, ass-smoocher. IT was about looks. You might get a chubby for an old hag like Shrillary, but most heterosexual men would choose the GOP nominee for the U.S. Senate over the secretary of State ANY day of the week. And I am not persuaded that Christine is truly the right person for the job. I KNOW my former Senator, Shrillary Rotten Clinton, was a fucking moron liberoidal piece of shit.
 
She is attractive. So what? We aren't electing people to look at them. If that was the case that inez sainz woman would probably be winning an election since she is the popular attractive person this week. Tomorrow it would be someone else.

So far I hear that Ms. Christine O'Donnell is stupid. No evidence provided. That she is wacko. No evidence provided.

Isn't it funny how everyone who doesn't follow the liberal/progressive agenda is stupid/insane and has no chance to win?

You never hear anything about liberal/progressive candidate being stupid/insane do you?

"Isn't it funny how everyone who doesn't follow the liberal/progressive agenda is stupid/insane and has no chance to win?

You never hear anything about liberal/progressive candidate being stupid/insane do you? "

are you being facetious?

I hear "liberals are stupid" and "liberalism is a mental disorder" all the time....

....Typically from that long-time "conservative"-spokesman who STILL hasn't "come out", yet.

:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Cluephone for Liability (hey man, it's been awhile). The article was written by a conservative, David Freddoso, who used to write for the National Review. Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Dickless: Thanks for sharing information I didn't ask for or need. And the point of "who" wrote that bullshit is what?

That because it was written by some alleged "conservative" that it's now accurate?

It already has been proved to be less than accurate, dipshit.

Your fallacy based (suppressed) premise is an undisguised appeal to authority, but the fact that the article says shit which the person quoting it didn't bother to check was the pint I was making.

You really are one clueless motherfucker, dickless. :lol:

I'm not the fucking moron who claimed it was written by a liberal. You're the idiot who didn't have a clue that the charges were penned by a wingnut.

I would have asked "well, WHICH fucking moron ARE you, then?" But I have been advised that you outed yourself as Stush from the old Hannity Board.

This proves that you are just a stupid douche bag after all.

And now that you have tipped your hand, ass-munch, I guess I am obliged to confirm one thing you said. Yes. When you periodically violated the terms of service by coming back under new user-names as a "retread," as other people did, I did from time to time take minor pleasure in exposing your deceit.

You were a sub-standad liberoidal scum-sucker then and it looks like you haven't changed at all. Dickless, may I call you Stushie? You are still just a poor joke. :lol:
 
Dickless: Thanks for sharing information I didn't ask for or need. And the point of "who" wrote that bullshit is what?

That because it was written by some alleged "conservative" that it's now accurate?

It already has been proved to be less than accurate, dipshit.

Your fallacy based (suppressed) premise is an undisguised appeal to authority, but the fact that the article says shit which the person quoting it didn't bother to check was the pint I was making.

You really are one clueless motherfucker, dickless. :lol:

I'm not the fucking moron who claimed it was written by a liberal. You're the idiot who didn't have a clue that the charges were penned by a wingnut.

Your inability to grasp the meaning of simple written words, Dickless Tucker is amusing.

Again, you simpleton, I was making reference not to the original author of that litany of accusations, but the special Board guest who elected to share it here.

Do try to keep up, dickless.

You're the stupid little bitch who claimed it was written by a liberal. So either you're a liar or a complete moron. Those are not mutually exclusive, btw.
 
I'm not the fucking moron who claimed it was written by a liberal. You're the idiot who didn't have a clue that the charges were penned by a wingnut.

Your inability to grasp the meaning of simple written words, Dickless Tucker is amusing.

Again, you simpleton, I was making reference not to the original author of that litany of accusations, but the special Board guest who elected to share it here.

Do try to keep up, dickless.

You're the stupid little bitch who claimed it was written by a liberal. So either you're a liar or a complete moron. Those are not mutually exclusive, btw.

Again, retard, I was referring to the post, not to the original author.

And yes, you have already proved that you are a liar and a moron.

So, Dickless, what else ya got, pinhead?
 
Dickless: Thanks for sharing information I didn't ask for or need. And the point of "who" wrote that bullshit is what?

That because it was written by some alleged "conservative" that it's now accurate?

It already has been proved to be less than accurate, dipshit.

Your fallacy based (suppressed) premise is an undisguised appeal to authority, but the fact that the article says shit which the person quoting it didn't bother to check was the pint I was making.

You really are one clueless motherfucker, dickless. :lol:

I'm not the fucking moron who claimed it was written by a liberal. You're the idiot who didn't have a clue that the charges were penned by a wingnut.

I would have asked "well, WHICH fucking moron ARE you, then?" But I have been advised that you outed yourself as Stush from the old Hannity Board.

This proves that you are just a stupid douche bag after all.

And now that you have tipped your hand, ass-munch, I guess I am obliged to confirm one thing you said. Yes. When you periodically violated the terms of service by coming back under new user-names as a "retread," as other people did, I did from time to time take minor pleasure in exposing your deceit.

You were a sub-standad liberoidal scum-sucker then and it looks like you haven't changed at all. Dickless, may I call you Stushie? You are still just a poor joke. :lol:

You've exposed nothing other than you're dumber than a doorknob, twinkle toes. It must suck to be on this board, without your buddy Kington to bail your pathetic little ass out.
 
Your inability to grasp the meaning of simple written words, Dickless Tucker is amusing.

Again, you simpleton, I was making reference not to the original author of that litany of accusations, but the special Board guest who elected to share it here.

Do try to keep up, dickless.

You're the stupid little bitch who claimed it was written by a liberal. So either you're a liar or a complete moron. Those are not mutually exclusive, btw.

Again, retard, I was referring to the post, not to the original author.

And yes, you have already proved that you are a liar and a moron.

So, Dickless, what else ya got, pinhead?

Q: How many insults can we squeeze in to one post?
 
I'm not the fucking moron who claimed it was written by a liberal. You're the idiot who didn't have a clue that the charges were penned by a wingnut.

I would have asked "well, WHICH fucking moron ARE you, then?" But I have been advised that you outed yourself as Stush from the old Hannity Board.

This proves that you are just a stupid douche bag after all.

And now that you have tipped your hand, ass-munch, I guess I am obliged to confirm one thing you said. Yes. When you periodically violated the terms of service by coming back under new user-names as a "retread," as other people did, I did from time to time take minor pleasure in exposing your deceit.

You were a sub-standad liberoidal scum-sucker then and it looks like you haven't changed at all. Dickless, may I call you Stushie? You are still just a poor joke. :lol:

You've exposed nothing other than you're dumber than a doorknob, twinkle toes. It must suck to be on this board, without your buddy Kington to bail your pathetic little ass out.

when you teabag do ya dip em once? twice? or thrice? we needs us some demonstration.
 
Your post constitutes Exhibit 1 that you liberal Democratics will say anything in a moment of desperation.

How many of those "Exhibits" you just threw out there have you verified as being truthful, accurate or even reasonably based?

Cluephone for Liability (hey man, it's been awhile). The article was written by a conservative, David Freddoso, who used to write for the National Review. Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....let him try to discredit the conservatives all he wants. It's fun to watch people who don't have a clue what they are talking about!

They DO have a tendency to ramble....on, and on, and on, and on, and on, and on..... :cuckoo:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PIzfXrQk-Y]YouTube - Palin's Rambling Nuclear Weapons Answer[/ame]*
[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lj3iNxZ8Dww[/ame]​
 
Last edited:
I'm not the fucking moron who claimed it was written by a liberal. You're the idiot who didn't have a clue that the charges were penned by a wingnut.

I would have asked "well, WHICH fucking moron ARE you, then?" But I have been advised that you outed yourself as Stush from the old Hannity Board.

This proves that you are just a stupid douche bag after all.

And now that you have tipped your hand, ass-munch, I guess I am obliged to confirm one thing you said. Yes. When you periodically violated the terms of service by coming back under new user-names as a "retread," as other people did, I did from time to time take minor pleasure in exposing your deceit.

You were a sub-standad liberoidal scum-sucker then and it looks like you haven't changed at all. Dickless, may I call you Stushie? You are still just a poor joke. :lol:

You've exposed nothing other than you're dumber than a doorknob, twinkle toes. It must suck to be on this board, without your buddy Kington to bail your pathetic little ass out.

Nah, with (admittedly) help from you (unwitting, of course, since you have no wit) I have already exposed you as a blowhard lightweight brainless dickless whimpering sissy girlie boi. And nobody had to bail me out, shit-chomper. Nobody needed any help from loooooooooosers like you! :lol:
 
Yet, another good looking Conservative...

Can someone show me an attractive Democratic that is in office?


Christine O'Donnell for U.S. Senate — Fighting For The First State

Palin

Bachmann

O'Donnell

You have quite a trend going there...and it ain't looks

jeopardy6.jpg



"What is Blunt-force trama.", Alex??

:lol:
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top