Another Attractive Conservative - Christine O'Donnell

Your post constitutes Exhibit 1 that you liberal Democratics will say anything in a moment of desperation.

How many of those "Exhibits" you just threw out there have you verified as being truthful, accurate or even reasonably based?

Cluephone for Liability (hey man, it's been awhile). The article was written by a conservative, David Freddoso, who used to write for the National Review. Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....let him try to discredit the conservatives all he wants. It's fun to watch people who don't have a clue what they are talking about!

That's OK, Liability and I go way back to Hannity. He was a constant source of amusement for his constant reporting my ban busting there.
 
Being female and under 50 doesn't make her attractive.....or smart.......or qualified......

Alas... If only she was a community organizer...
....As if that would pay (her) as well as a new-campaign.

How's she gonna eat, with no campaign-donations comin'-in??? :eusa_eh:

You mean other than the $42,000 her campaign received from the NRSC today, or the $500,000 in other donations? I don't think that qualifies as "no".
 
When I start voting for someone, because of how they look, shoot me.

Actually, there are a lot of historians who believe that JFK won the 1960 election from the female vote, and they voted for him because he was good looking.
I remember Republicans suggesting the same....about Danny "The Spaz" Quayle.

160x120_quayle.jpg

"For the Republicans he emerged as an ideal candidate. A baby boomer not associated with the hippie free love drug culture, and the anti war movement. He was a man of strong conservative convictions. He was a proven winner, having been elected twice to the House and twice to the Senate. An article in The St. James encyclopedia of Pop culture pointed out that Quayle had a slight resemblance to actor Robert Redford, which may have been considered in helping Bush win female votes."
 
Cluephone for Liability (hey man, it's been awhile). The article was written by a conservative, David Freddoso, who used to write for the National Review. Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....let him try to discredit the conservatives all he wants. It's fun to watch people who don't have a clue what they are talking about!

That's OK, Liability and I go way back to Hannity. He was a constant source of amusement for his constant reporting my ban busting there.

As you know, dickless tucker, I never "constantly" reported anybody there. But if lying makes it easier for you to post here, have a blast, ya fuckin' hapless retard.

LOL!
 
Last edited:
Now that Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP Senate primary in Delaware, Democrats will definitely retain Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. It’s not because O’Donnell is too conservative — it’s because of her numerous and serious personal issues.

(For those seeking specifics, there are plenty.

•Her lawsuit against ISI for “mental anguish” is exhibit A. It even contains an apparent lie about her seeking a Master’s Degree at Princeton.
•Exhibit B is her lies about having a college degree all these years — and no, she didn’t simply finish paying loans, as she implies. People who take student loans use them to pay their schools, and they get their degrees. She did not until 20 years later.
•Exhibit C is the fact that she has no apparent income, then she admitted to John McCormack that she has concealed income by leaving it off her financial disclosures.
•Exhibit D is the fact that she appears to be paying her personal rent with her campaign money, which is completely illegal.
•Exhibit E is the question about whether O’Donnell’s home was foreclosed. These three points suggest we have a grifter who understands conservative rhetoric.
•Exhibit F is her false claims that she “tied” or “beat” Joe Biden in two counties in 2008.
•Exhibit G is her campaign’s assertion that Scott Rasmussen is a tool of Mike Castle’s campaign.
•Exhibit H is her campaign’s deliberate stoking of rumors that Mike Castle would switch parties or has cut a deal with the Biden family to hand the seat over to Beau Biden in four years.
•Exhibit I is her former campaign staff’s video accusing Mike Castle (baselessly) of a homosexual affair, followed by O’Donnell calling him “unmanly.”
•Exhibit J is her paranoia over who’s hiding in the bushes and vandalizing her house.
•Exhibit K…well, you get the picture.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Your post constitutes Exhibit 1 that you liberal Democratics will say anything in a moment of desperation.

How many of those "Exhibits" you just threw out there have you verified as being truthful, accurate or even reasonably based?

Cluephone for Liability (hey man, it's been awhile). The article was written by a conservative, David Freddoso, who used to write for the National Review. Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Dickless: Thanks for sharing information I didn't ask for or need. And the point of "who" wrote that bullshit is what?

That because it was written by some alleged "conservative" that it's now accurate?

It already has been proved to be less than accurate, dipshit.

Your fallacy based (suppressed) premise is an undisguised appeal to authority, but the fact that the article says shit which the person quoting it didn't bother to check was the pint I was making.

You really are one clueless motherfucker, dickless. :lol:
 
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....let him try to discredit the conservatives all he wants. It's fun to watch people who don't have a clue what they are talking about!

That's OK, Liability and I go way back to Hannity. He was a constant source of amusement for his constant reporting my ban busting there.

As you know, dickless tucker, I never "constantly" reported anybody there. But if lying makes it easier for you to post here, have a blast, ya fuckin' hapless retard.

LOL!

You were Lee Kington's rat bitch. Don't lie. You used to live on that mod forum asking if anyone who showed what a clueless moron you are was a retread. I never really hid the fact that I was stushie, and you were the first little whining dweeb over there to rat me out.
 
Last edited:
I believe this IS showing that the Tea Party movement is a lot stronger than both democrats and republicans would like to believe. That's the 800 pound gorilla in the room.

the extremes always prevail during the primaries because they're the ones who go out to vote.

same extremist loons as before.

the only difference is the tea party loony candidates won't move center for the general election. And that means, in most circumstances, like in NY-23 or PA-12 and now even in previously sure repub winners like NV and Del senate, the R's are going to have problems.

RINOs Specter, Murkowski and now Castle are gone... Looks like you can add Crist to the list too...lol (I see you stopped saying Crist was a definite winnere there.... Hmmm....)

The thing is, conservatives told y'all we were going to do this... Most of us never believed the Senate was in play anyway, and even a 1 seat lead won't "control" it, so... Having control of the House is still good for gridlock... Anything on the Senate side was just gravy...

Buh-Bye RINOs....:D
 
Your post constitutes Exhibit 1 that you liberal Democratics will say anything in a moment of desperation.

How many of those "Exhibits" you just threw out there have you verified as being truthful, accurate or even reasonably based?

Cluephone for Liability (hey man, it's been awhile). The article was written by a conservative, David Freddoso, who used to write for the National Review. Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Dickless: Thanks for sharing information I didn't ask for or need. And the point of "who" wrote that bullshit is what?

That because it was written by some alleged "conservative" that it's now accurate?

It already has been proved to be less than accurate, dipshit.

Your fallacy based (suppressed) premise is an undisguised appeal to authority, but the fact that the article says shit which the person quoting it didn't bother to check was the pint I was making.

You really are one clueless motherfucker, dickless. :lol:

I'm not the fucking moron who claimed it was written by a liberal. You're the idiot who didn't have a clue that the charges were penned by a wingnut.
 
I don't think the OP did either...

So, the point of making such a post in the "politics" forum was........?

I think it might have been a trap to get one of you goobers to tell us how "lovely" Shrillary Clinton is.

:lol:
Christine O'Donnell would have to stand on her Mother's shoulders, to kiss Hillary Clinton's ass.

She wouldn't even qualify as a Rookie, compared to Hillary Clinton. :rolleyes:

No comparison.....​

"O'Donnell rose to national attention in the 1990s as a social conservative, appearing on shows like Bill Maher's "Politically Incorrect" to campaign against pornography and masturbation."
 
Last edited:
7 word sentence, 4 words are spelled incorrectly. You'd think someone with no job would have more time in the day to at least spell check.

job? I've been out swimming in my pool looking at the glorious blue color of the sky

While the rest of us work hard to pick up the slack for non-workers like you. Be proud.

Your "hard working" job is posting on USMB?

You must be a government worker....
 

Forum List

Back
Top