Another Attractive Conservative - Christine O'Donnell

She is attractive. So what? We aren't electing people to look at them. If that was the case that inez sainz woman would probably be winning an election since she is the popular attractive person this week. Tomorrow it would be someone else.

So far I hear that Ms. Christine O'Donnell is stupid. No evidence provided. That she is wacko. No evidence provided.

Isn't it funny how everyone who doesn't follow the liberal/progressive agenda is stupid/insane and has no chance to win?

You never hear anything about liberal/progressive candidate being stupid/insane do you?

How about, she's a fucking liar? Does that count?

Evidence provided:


Now that Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP Senate primary in Delaware, Democrats will definitely retain Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. It’s not because O’Donnell is too conservative — it’s because of her numerous and serious personal issues.

(For those seeking specifics, there are plenty.

•Her lawsuit against ISI for “mental anguish” is exhibit A. It even contains an apparent lie about her seeking a Master’s Degree at Princeton.
•Exhibit B is her lies about having a college degree all these years — and no, she didn’t simply finish paying loans, as she implies. People who take student loans use them to pay their schools, and they get their degrees. She did not until 20 years later.
•Exhibit C is the fact that she has no apparent income, then she admitted to John McCormack that she has concealed income by leaving it off her financial disclosures.
•Exhibit D is the fact that she appears to be paying her personal rent with her campaign money, which is completely illegal.
•Exhibit E is the question about whether O’Donnell’s home was foreclosed. These three points suggest we have a grifter who understands conservative rhetoric.
•Exhibit F is her false claims that she “tied” or “beat” Joe Biden in two counties in 2008.
•Exhibit G is her campaign’s assertion that Scott Rasmussen is a tool of Mike Castle’s campaign.
•Exhibit H is her campaign’s deliberate stoking of rumors that Mike Castle would switch parties or has cut a deal with the Biden family to hand the seat over to Beau Biden in four years.
•Exhibit I is her former campaign staff’s video accusing Mike Castle (baselessly) of a homosexual affair, followed by O’Donnell calling him “unmanly.”
•Exhibit J is her paranoia over who’s hiding in the bushes and vandalizing her house.
•Exhibit K…well, you get the picture.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner


"The Old Adventures of New Christine"

She even looks a lot like Julia Louis-Dreyfuss.

(Could a made for TV movie be in the works?)
 
Homosexuals and women are going to take over the republican party because they have bigger balls than the wimpified republican men.
mitch_mcconnell.jpg
images


They can't help it. They were born that way.....

:eusa_whistle:
 
She is attractive. So what? We aren't electing people to look at them. If that was the case that inez sainz woman would probably be winning an election since she is the popular attractive person this week. Tomorrow it would be someone else.

So far I hear that Ms. Christine O'Donnell is stupid. No evidence provided. That she is wacko. No evidence provided.

Isn't it funny how everyone who doesn't follow the liberal/progressive agenda is stupid/insane and has no chance to win?

You never hear anything about liberal/progressive candidate being stupid/insane do you?

"Isn't it funny how everyone who doesn't follow the liberal/progressive agenda is stupid/insane and has no chance to win?

You never hear anything about liberal/progressive candidate being stupid/insane do you? "

are you being facetious?

I hear "liberals are stupid" and "liberalism is a mental disorder" all the time....
 
Now that Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP Senate primary in Delaware, Democrats will definitely retain Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. It’s not because O’Donnell is too conservative — it’s because of her numerous and serious personal issues.

(For those seeking specifics, there are plenty.

•Her lawsuit against ISI for “mental anguish” is exhibit A. It even contains an apparent lie about her seeking a Master’s Degree at Princeton.
•Exhibit B is her lies about having a college degree all these years — and no, she didn’t simply finish paying loans, as she implies. People who take student loans use them to pay their schools, and they get their degrees. She did not until 20 years later.
•Exhibit C is the fact that she has no apparent income, then she admitted to John McCormack that she has concealed income by leaving it off her financial disclosures.
•Exhibit D is the fact that she appears to be paying her personal rent with her campaign money, which is completely illegal.
•Exhibit E is the question about whether O’Donnell’s home was foreclosed. These three points suggest we have a grifter who understands conservative rhetoric.
•Exhibit F is her false claims that she “tied” or “beat” Joe Biden in two counties in 2008.
•Exhibit G is her campaign’s assertion that Scott Rasmussen is a tool of Mike Castle’s campaign.
•Exhibit H is her campaign’s deliberate stoking of rumors that Mike Castle would switch parties or has cut a deal with the Biden family to hand the seat over to Beau Biden in four years.
•Exhibit I is her former campaign staff’s video accusing Mike Castle (baselessly) of a homosexual affair, followed by O’Donnell calling him “unmanly.”
•Exhibit J is her paranoia over who’s hiding in the bushes and vandalizing her house.
•Exhibit K…well, you get the picture.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Your post constitutes Exhibit 1 that you liberal Democratics will say anything in a moment of desperation.

How many of those "Exhibits" you just threw out there have you verified as being truthful, accurate or even reasonably based?

Hey....disprove, AWAY!!!

(Maybe this time you'll get lucky. :rolleyes: )
 
I believe this IS showing that the Tea Party movement is a lot stronger than both democrats and republicans would like to believe. That's the 800 pound gorilla in the room.

the extremes always prevail during the primaries because they're the ones who go out to vote.

same extremist loons as before.

the only difference is the tea party loony candidates won't move center for the general election. And that means, in most circumstances, like in NY-23 or PA-12 and now even in previously sure repub winners like NV and Del senate, the R's are going to have problems.
 
She is attractive. So what? We aren't electing people to look at them. If that was the case that inez sainz woman would probably be winning an election since she is the popular attractive person this week. Tomorrow it would be someone else.

So far I hear that Ms. Christine O'Donnell is stupid. No evidence provided. That she is wacko. No evidence provided.

Isn't it funny how everyone who doesn't follow the liberal/progressive agenda is stupid/insane and has no chance to win?

WE'VE always found it somewhat humorous.

529.gif
 
Now that Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP Senate primary in Delaware, Democrats will definitely retain Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. It’s not because O’Donnell is too conservative — it’s because of her numerous and serious personal issues.

(For those seeking specifics, there are plenty.

•Her lawsuit against ISI for “mental anguish” is exhibit A. It even contains an apparent lie about her seeking a Master’s Degree at Princeton.
•Exhibit B is her lies about having a college degree all these years — and no, she didn’t simply finish paying loans, as she implies. People who take student loans use them to pay their schools, and they get their degrees. She did not until 20 years later.
•Exhibit C is the fact that she has no apparent income, then she admitted to John McCormack that she has concealed income by leaving it off her financial disclosures.
•Exhibit D is the fact that she appears to be paying her personal rent with her campaign money, which is completely illegal.
•Exhibit E is the question about whether O’Donnell’s home was foreclosed. These three points suggest we have a grifter who understands conservative rhetoric.
•Exhibit F is her false claims that she “tied” or “beat” Joe Biden in two counties in 2008.
•Exhibit G is her campaign’s assertion that Scott Rasmussen is a tool of Mike Castle’s campaign.
•Exhibit H is her campaign’s deliberate stoking of rumors that Mike Castle would switch parties or has cut a deal with the Biden family to hand the seat over to Beau Biden in four years.
•Exhibit I is her former campaign staff’s video accusing Mike Castle (baselessly) of a homosexual affair, followed by O’Donnell calling him “unmanly.”
•Exhibit J is her paranoia over who’s hiding in the bushes and vandalizing her house.
•Exhibit K…well, you get the picture.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Your post constitutes Exhibit 1 that you liberal Democratics will say anything in a moment of desperation.

How many of those "Exhibits" you just threw out there have you verified as being truthful, accurate or even reasonably based?

Hey....disprove, AWAY!!!

* * * *​


No need for luck. I already posted one example of how one of the Exhibits was bogus.

And the point, you moron, was that the person making (regurgitating) that litany of accusations probably never bothered, himself, to verify any of them. Not that we'd expect some lib with a partisan hack agenda to do anything honorable like that. The one item I first looked at, in fact, I was promptly able to refute.​
 
She is attractive. So what? We aren't electing people to look at them. If that was the case that inez sainz woman would probably be winning an election since she is the popular attractive person this week. Tomorrow it would be someone else.

So far I hear that Ms. Christine O'Donnell is stupid. No evidence provided. That she is wacko. No evidence provided.

Isn't it funny how everyone who doesn't follow the liberal/progressive agenda is stupid/insane and has no chance to win?

You never hear anything about liberal/progressive candidate being stupid/insane do you?

You just don't see it. That's how people are on the extreme right. They don't acknowledge things they don't like.
....And, in such large-numbers!!!!

:clap2:

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sdbMhprJTK0]YouTube - Right America Feeling Wronged 1[/ame]​
 
I believe this IS showing that the Tea Party movement is a lot stronger than both democrats and republicans would like to believe. That's the 800 pound gorilla in the room.

It will probably screw the republicans, a lot more than it will screw the democrats.
 
I believe this IS showing that the Tea Party movement is a lot stronger than both democrats and republicans would like to believe. That's the 800 pound gorilla in the room.

It will probably screw the republicans, a lot more than it will screw the democrats.

You very well could be right, Luissa.
 
Now that Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP Senate primary in Delaware, Democrats will definitely retain Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. It’s not because O’Donnell is too conservative — it’s because of her numerous and serious personal issues.

(For those seeking specifics, there are plenty.

•Her lawsuit against ISI for “mental anguish” is exhibit A. It even contains an apparent lie about her seeking a Master’s Degree at Princeton.
•Exhibit B is her lies about having a college degree all these years — and no, she didn’t simply finish paying loans, as she implies. People who take student loans use them to pay their schools, and they get their degrees. She did not until 20 years later.
•Exhibit C is the fact that she has no apparent income, then she admitted to John McCormack that she has concealed income by leaving it off her financial disclosures.
•Exhibit D is the fact that she appears to be paying her personal rent with her campaign money, which is completely illegal.
•Exhibit E is the question about whether O’Donnell’s home was foreclosed. These three points suggest we have a grifter who understands conservative rhetoric.
•Exhibit F is her false claims that she “tied” or “beat” Joe Biden in two counties in 2008.
•Exhibit G is her campaign’s assertion that Scott Rasmussen is a tool of Mike Castle’s campaign.
•Exhibit H is her campaign’s deliberate stoking of rumors that Mike Castle would switch parties or has cut a deal with the Biden family to hand the seat over to Beau Biden in four years.
•Exhibit I is her former campaign staff’s video accusing Mike Castle (baselessly) of a homosexual affair, followed by O’Donnell calling him “unmanly.”
•Exhibit J is her paranoia over who’s hiding in the bushes and vandalizing her house.
•Exhibit K…well, you get the picture.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Your post constitutes Exhibit 1 that you liberal Democratics will say anything in a moment of desperation.

How many of those "Exhibits" you just threw out there have you verified as being truthful, accurate or even reasonably based?

Cluephone for Liability (hey man, it's been awhile). The article was written by a conservative, David Freddoso, who used to write for the National Review. Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner
 
Now that Christine O’Donnell has won the GOP Senate primary in Delaware, Democrats will definitely retain Joe Biden’s old Senate seat. It’s not because O’Donnell is too conservative — it’s because of her numerous and serious personal issues.

(For those seeking specifics, there are plenty.

•Her lawsuit against ISI for “mental anguish” is exhibit A. It even contains an apparent lie about her seeking a Master’s Degree at Princeton.
•Exhibit B is her lies about having a college degree all these years — and no, she didn’t simply finish paying loans, as she implies. People who take student loans use them to pay their schools, and they get their degrees. She did not until 20 years later.
•Exhibit C is the fact that she has no apparent income, then she admitted to John McCormack that she has concealed income by leaving it off her financial disclosures.
•Exhibit D is the fact that she appears to be paying her personal rent with her campaign money, which is completely illegal.
•Exhibit E is the question about whether O’Donnell’s home was foreclosed. These three points suggest we have a grifter who understands conservative rhetoric.
•Exhibit F is her false claims that she “tied” or “beat” Joe Biden in two counties in 2008.
•Exhibit G is her campaign’s assertion that Scott Rasmussen is a tool of Mike Castle’s campaign.
•Exhibit H is her campaign’s deliberate stoking of rumors that Mike Castle would switch parties or has cut a deal with the Biden family to hand the seat over to Beau Biden in four years.
•Exhibit I is her former campaign staff’s video accusing Mike Castle (baselessly) of a homosexual affair, followed by O’Donnell calling him “unmanly.”
•Exhibit J is her paranoia over who’s hiding in the bushes and vandalizing her house.
•Exhibit K…well, you get the picture.


Read more at the Washington Examiner: Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Your post constitutes Exhibit 1 that you liberal Democratics will say anything in a moment of desperation.

How many of those "Exhibits" you just threw out there have you verified as being truthful, accurate or even reasonably based?

Cluephone for Liability (hey man, it's been awhile). The article was written by a conservative, David Freddoso, who used to write for the National Review. Democrats will keep Delaware seat, but look at the bright side | Washington Examiner

Shhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....let him try to discredit the conservatives all he wants. It's fun to watch people who don't have a clue what they are talking about!
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top