- Moderator
- #21
You just don't see it. That's how people are on the extreme right. They don't acknowledge things they don't like.
No. We just don't acknowledge things that have no basis in facts.
There is a difference.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You just don't see it. That's how people are on the extreme right. They don't acknowledge things they don't like.
Being female and under 50 doesn't make her attractive.....or smart.......or qualified......
Being female and under 50 doesn't make her attractive.....or smart.......or qualified......
Alas... If only she was a community organizer...
You never hear anything about liberal/progressive candidate being stupid/insane do you?
When I start voting for someone, because of how they look, shoot me.
Being female and under 50 doesn't make her attractive.....or smart.......or qualified......
Alas... If only she was a community organizer...
Being female and under 50 doesn't make her attractive.....or smart.......or qualified......
Alas... If only she was a community organizer...
as opposed to someone who took college loans and lived off of them?
if they have boobs, does it even matter if they're brain dead?
All I say is another attractive Conservative and all of a sudden I voting for her because of the way she looks.... Her values have nothing to do with it... This coming from a group of people who vote for someone because they speak intelligently, forget what they believe.... LOL
I guess I have my answer as to where are the attractive Democrats.... There are none... Thank you for failing to answer my question! Typical libs....
Being female and under 50 doesn't make her attractive.....or smart.......or qualified......
Alas... If only she was a community organizer...
Then at least we'd be judging her worth on something more then how attractive she is.
Alas... If only she was a community organizer...
Then at least we'd be judging her worth on something more then how attractive she is.
You're the one who mentioned "qualified"...
Then at least we'd be judging her worth on something more then how attractive she is.
You're the one who mentioned "qualified"...
I didn't say she was or wasn't qualified. I said her looks have nothing to do with her qualifications or intelligence, etc...
Then at least we'd be judging her worth on something more then how attractive she is.
You're the one who mentioned "qualified"...
I didn't say she was or wasn't qualified. I said her looks have nothing to do with her qualifications or intelligence, etc...
You're the one who mentioned "qualified"...
I didn't say she was or wasn't qualified. I said her looks have nothing to do with her qualifications or intelligence, etc...
No one has stated it did.
You're the one who mentioned "qualified"...
I didn't say she was or wasn't qualified. I said her looks have nothing to do with her qualifications or intelligence, etc...
I don't think the OP did either...
I didn't say she was or wasn't qualified. I said her looks have nothing to do with her qualifications or intelligence, etc...
I don't think the OP did either...
So, the point of making such a post in the "politics" forum was........?
I didn't say she was or wasn't qualified. I said her looks have nothing to do with her qualifications or intelligence, etc...
I don't think the OP did either...
So, the point of making such a post in the "politics" forum was........?
When I start voting for someone, because of how they look, shoot me.