Anointing Democrat Heroes.

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Here comes one right now….Andrew McCabe.

“In ‘The Threat,’ Andrew McCabe Issues the Latest Warning Call About Trump’s America” In ‘The Threat,’ Andrew McCabe Issues the Latest Warning Call About Trump’s America

And, what makes McCabe a Democrat hero?

If we put aside outright corruption….for a moment…..how to explain the special and unique rights and privileges given to the Clintonistas by James Comey, Andrew McCabe and the FBI and the DoJ?
Their heroes function "by any means necessary....."
Any.




1.One would need a crystal ball, or some past-reading equivalent.

“Justice Dept. Granted Immunity to Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton’s Emails” Justice Dept. Granted Immunity to Specialist Who Deleted Hillary Clinton’s Emails



“Three More Hillary Clinton Witnesses Were Given Immunity by FBI” Three More Hillary Clinton Witnesses Were Given Immunity by FBI



“Five Clinton aides received immunity deals in FBI probe” Five Clinton aides received immunity deals in FBI probe


“…it has now come to light that Hillary Clinton attempted to destroy about 30 emails related to the 2012 Benghazi massacre. They were recovered by the FBI, notwithstanding the use by Mrs. “Like With a Cloth or Something” of an advanced software program – “BleachBit” – in a willful effort to erase the contents of her servers so thoroughly that no one would be able to recover her emails (many of which were government records, which it is a felony to hoard and destroy).” Multiple Outrages in Clinton-Obama Benghazi Obstruction | National Review




“…the lawyers for Clinton who were permitted to be present for the interview. Among them is Cheryl Mills, …

… the Justice Department was allowing Cheryl Mills – a witness, if not a subject, of the investigation – to invoke attorney-client privilege on behalf of Mrs. Clinton in order to thwart the FBI’s attempt to inquire into the procedure used to produce Clinton’s emails to the State Department. Mills was a participant in that procedure – and it is the procedure in which, we now know, well over 30,000 emails were attempted to be destroyed, including several thousand that contained government-related business.” Clinton’s FBI Interview What Was Cheryl Mills Doing There? | National Review




Did I mention special and unique rights and privileges given to the Clintonistas by Comey, McCabe, et al, at the FBI and the DoJ?

And that made them heroes to the Democrats/Liberals.

Seems rectitude is to be eschewed.
 
The DOJ is nothing but democrat lawyers, why should we expect fair treatment under the Law? The top of the FBI were democrat sycophants as the OP proves, so who can do a real investigation into obvious democrat wrongdoing? Nothing happened to Lois Lerner for her using the IRS as an arm of the DNC. Barr has his work cut out for him, and it won't be easy.
 
Like where McCabe testified how Trump trusted Putin’s view of N Korea over the FBI
 
Like where McCabe testified how Trump trusted Putin’s view of N Korea over the FBI

The FBI has nothing to do with NK, that would be the CIA's job. McCabe is a proven liar and will be in prison after he's charged. Trump has every reason not to trust the FBI after the coup they attempted.
 
Like where McCabe testified how Trump trusted Putin’s view of N Korea over the FBI

With McCabe's track record nobody really cares what he has to say.



2. Some do...... McCabe is doing his book tour.



Remember the last such book tour, by this guy???

“Very little was known about how FBI director James Comey reached his decision not to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton.

…nothing was revealed about the actions taken by agents and lawyer within the FBI who were intimately involved in the investigation….

The Clinton exoneration statement and its evolution from criminality to absolution was a closely guarded secret….

Why did Comey initially find that Clinton was ‘grossly negligent’ in violation of the law, but then alter the critical language to clear her……???? How could that have even happened before any of the principal witnesses, including Clinton, were interviewed?”
Jarrett, “The Russia Hoax,” p 47-48
 
Like where McCabe testified how Trump trusted Putin’s view of N Korea over the FBI

With McCabe's track record nobody really cares what he has to say.



2. Some do...... McCabe is doing his book tour.



Remember the last such book tour, by this guy???

“Very little was known about how FBI director James Comey reached his decision not to pursue criminal charges against Hillary Clinton.

…nothing was revealed about the actions taken by agents and lawyer within the FBI who were intimately involved in the investigation….

The Clinton exoneration statement and its evolution from criminality to absolution was a closely guarded secret….

Why did Comey initially find that Clinton was ‘grossly negligent’ in violation of the law, but then alter the critical language to clear her……???? How could that have even happened before any of the principal witnesses, including Clinton, were interviewed?”
Jarrett, “The Russia Hoax,” p 47-48

You know how libs are, destroy Trump and America at any cost.
 
Much has been made of the immunity that Clinton's "specialist" was given...but what's ignored is that it was given in EXCHANGE for co-operation.

And that co-operation was given and produced nothing to indict Clinton.
Oh...
 
Like where McCabe testified how Trump trusted Putin’s view of N Korea over the FBI

The FBI has nothing to do with NK, that would be the CIA's job. McCabe is a proven liar and will be in prison after he's charged. Trump has every reason not to trust the FBI after the coup they attempted.
A coup?

Is telling the truth now considered a coup?
 
Yup, that's what happens when you're President of a country.

What DOESN'T "normally" happen is a President taking the word of an adversary over his own intel agencies and making policies based on that
 
And the basis of that claim is that they don't support your Orange Blotus who gets HIS intel from PUTIN?
 
3. The McCabes saw that $675,000 goes a long way!

Comey was in charge of the Clinton email investigation….but six months before he threw in the towel, he appointed Andrew McCabe deputy director.




Did Comey know that in early 2015 McCabe’s wife was recruited by Democrats to run for office right after Clinton’s email scandal became public:

“Judicial Watch Releases New DOJ Documents Showing McCabe's Conflict of Interest in Clinton Investigation Groups aligned with Clinton and McAuliffe donated $675,000 to Jill McCabe’s Senate campaign which amounted to nearly 40 percent of the campaign's total funds.” Judicial Watch: New DOJ Documents Show McCabe's Conflict of Interest in Clinton Investigation



$675,000….just two months after the FBI began the investigation.
Peanuts next to the $145 million another Democrat heroine got from the Kremlin.....



bribe
Dictionary result for bribe
/brīb/
verb
  1. 1.
    persuade (someone) to act in one's favor, typically illegally or dishonestly, by a gift of money or other inducement.
 
4. If you’re taking bribes, and breaking the law….well, try to put a smiley face on it, or at least come up with some excuse...



“Comey and the FBI never questioned Clinton about her public statements, which changed over time and were blatantly false. “I did not email classified information to anyone” morphed into “I did not email anything marked ‘classified,’” which morphed into the claim that (c) did not mean what it clearly meant. False and changing statements are presented to juries routinely by prosecutors as evidence of guilt.

… on July 5, 2016, when he announced that the case against Clinton was closed. He justified his actions saying that he no longer trusted Attorney General Lynch after her June 27, 2016, meeting with Bill Clinton on the tarmac at the Phoenix airport. This meeting took place at the height of the so-called investigation—just days before Peter Strzok interviewed Clinton on July 2.



Thanks to the efforts of Judicial Watch to secure documents through the Freedom of Information Act, we now know that Comey was already drafting a letter exonerating Clinton in May 2016—prior to interviewing more than a dozen major witnesses. We also know that the FBI’s reaction to the impropriety of the tarmac meeting was not disgust, but rather anger at the person who leaked the fact of the meeting. “We need to find that guy” and bring him before a supervisor, stated one (name redacted) FBI agent. Another argued that the source should be banned from working security details. Not one email expressed concern over the meeting. An FBI director who truly had his trust shaken would have questioned the members of Lynch’s FBI security detail for the Arizona trip about how the meeting came to be. Comey didn’t bother.” The Politicization of the FBI
 
To be a Democrat hero.....nothing matters but winning.
No rectitude, honor, or integrity.....

See how Comey answers Gowdy in the Hearings about the criminal he gave a pass to.



5.Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said there was nothing marked classified on her e-mails sent or received. Was that true?

Comey: That's not true. There were a small number of portion markings on I think three of the documents.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said "I did not e-mail any classified information to anyone on my e-mail there was no classified material." That is true?

Comey: There was classified information emailed.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton used one device, was that true?

Comey: She used multiple devices during the four years of her term as Secretary of State.

Gowdy: Secretary Clinton said all work related emails were returned to the State Department. Was that true?

Comey: No. We found work related email, thousands, that were not returned.

Gowdy: False exculpatory statements are used for what?

Comey: Well, either for a substantive prosecution or evidence of intent in a criminal prosecution.

Gowdy: Exactly. Intent and consciousness of guilt, right?

Comey: That is right

Rep Trey Gowdy rips into FBI Director James Comey on Hillary Clinton's 'intent'
 

Forum List

Back
Top