Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why are there always some people who think we should be limited only to what we must have for survival?
/QUOTE]
might they be interested in oh i don't know...
hmmm.
what could it be...
hmm.
survival?
don't be dishonest shogun.
you know i never said animals should have the same exact same rights as humans. i thought you'd matured...
i'm merely taking issue with the suggestion that animals rights are merely something we extend to them.
when it fact those rights are self evident.
again it is wrong to treat animals cruelly, not because of the law. but due to their sentience.
Nobody is saying it is. The OP asked if we should treat animals that are raised to be eaten more humane, until they are ready for the old slaughter house.
My opinion is yes, they should be.
Then you can have a crueltry free steak!
Is that what you tell him before you give him his kibble?
That depends on the method chosen for raising them and slaughtering them. It may not exactly be sadism but it can be unnecessarily cruel.
what i always find interesting about animal issues.
is how over protective people get when it comes to eating meat.
it's like they feel a little guilt that they refuse to admit to...
what i always find interesting about animal issues.
is how over protective people get when it comes to eating meat.
it's like they feel a little guilt that they refuse to admit to...
I think some animals recognize certain rights within their own species...though we don't know how that works.
Rights are meant to protect our own species from destroying itself. As such, we cannot extend them to other species.
ok, i've got time to tear into little allie...
and perhaps animal cruelty?
seriously allie try it. take an animal downtown and beat it to death.
just tell folks it's your animal.
your property.
and your right.
Who are these people?
Can you show me that it does? People don't need to eat meat, you know, to keep from starving.
You implied that I suggested that a paraplegic, WITH A THUMB, not have the same human rights because of the Might makes Right argument. Shall I quote you?.
animal perception is not self evident because we have no way of looking through a dogs eyes. Their rights are not the product of anything less than humans extending as much. which, again, i'll remind you halts at the slaughterhouse.
and no, it's wrong to abuse an animal LEGALLY because we have extended protections against such. It has nothing to do with their sentience. If you think so, then there are a lot of sentient creatures being killed for the sake of our daily meat consuption.. and yet we allow this to happen
I think some animals recognize certain rights within their own species...though we don't know how that works.
Rights are meant to protect our own species from destroying itself. As such, we cannot extend them to other species.