And let the rotton onion peeling begin.

I take your Early 2002 and Raise you September 12, 2001.

On Imus , Snow misleadingly claimed that Bush "never has" linked Saddam, 9-11 | Media Matters for America

Moreover, the 9-11 Commission found that Bush asked his staff to explore possible links between Iraq and 9-11 as early as September 12, 2001. The 9-11 Commission's report noted that, according to former national counterterrorism coordinator Richard A. Clarke, Bush asked him on the evening of September 12 to investigate possible Iraqi links to the previous day's attacks:

Clarke has written that on the evening of September 12, President Bush told him and some of his staff to explore possible Iraqi links to 9/11. "See if Sad-dam did this," Clarke recalls the President telling them. "See if he's linked in any way." While he believed the details of Clarke's account to be incorrect, President Bush acknowledged [in an April 29, 2004, interview with the commission] that he might well have spoken to Clarke at some point, asking him about Iraq.

:lol: But yes, this shall proven very interesting. Ironically, the truth about Iraq is going to officially come from the UK, and not here.
 
“The occupation of Iraq began five years ago today, but few realize that the march to war began ten years ago under Bill Clinton, when regime change became official U.S. policy. In 1998, I took to the House floor in protest of the Iraqi Liberation Act to warn that, ‘I see this legislation as essentially being a declaration of virtual war. It is giving the President tremendous powers to pursue war efforts against a sovereign Nation.’ My warnings were largely dismissed at the time, but five years later, we were bombing Iraq.

~Dr. Ron Paul, in 2008

Ron Paul on the 10th Anniversary of the War on Iraq « LewRockwell.com Blog
 
“The occupation of Iraq began five years ago today, but few realize that the march to war began ten years ago under Bill Clinton, when regime change became official U.S. policy. In 1998, I took to the House floor in protest of the Iraqi Liberation Act to warn that, ‘I see this legislation as essentially being a declaration of virtual war. It is giving the President tremendous powers to pursue war efforts against a sovereign Nation.’ My warnings were largely dismissed at the time, but five years later, we were bombing Iraq.

~Dr. Ron Paul, in 2008

Ron Paul on the 10th Anniversary of the War on Iraq « LewRockwell.com Blog

Good thing you didn't make a bet, I fold. :lol:

Though I wouldn't exactly use Ron Paul as the source to end all sources. Especially since the weekly bombings of Iraq go back further to the Bush 41 Administration.
 
There's one thing to desire regime change, and research how that could come about with a dictator. It's another thing to invade a sovereign nation using 9-11 as a catalyst when we should have been rounding up all responsible for said tragedy. I think the Bush administration saw dollar signs and figured that the Iraqis wouldn't fight back. This was the beginning of the disaster we now have at hand. It is obvious that chasing WMD's was not the impetus for invading Iraq. And at that particular time - when the rawness of 9-11 was still there. I really had hoped that I was wrong about the intentions of the last administration... that they would intentionally do this to the American people. Each passing revelation is proving more and more that I am right.
 
"BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSHH!! AN FOX NOOOOOOOOOOOZ!!!" My God,when will these Hopey Changey Loons get some new material? What a Snooze Fest.
 
"BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSHH!! AN FOX NOOOOOOOOOOOZ!!!" My God,when will these Hopey Changey Loons get some new material? What a Snooze Fest.

These sorry ass fools have nothing else Libo...they're even too damn stupid to realize that 1...Bush has never ever said, or any one else in his administration for that matter, Iraq was responsible or was complicent in 9/11....and 2....regime change as a foreign policy started with Clinton. I guess Clinton was not only the first "black" President but also the first "black" neocon!!
 
“The occupation of Iraq began five years ago today, but few realize that the march to war began ten years ago under Bill Clinton, when regime change became official U.S. policy. In 1998, I took to the House floor in protest of the Iraqi Liberation Act to warn that, ‘I see this legislation as essentially being a declaration of virtual war. It is giving the President tremendous powers to pursue war efforts against a sovereign Nation.’ My warnings were largely dismissed at the time, but five years later, we were bombing Iraq.

~Dr. Ron Paul, in 2008

Ron Paul on the 10th Anniversary of the War on Iraq « LewRockwell.com Blog

Letter to President Clinton on Iraq

January 26, 1998

The Honorable William J. Clinton
President of the United States
Washington, DC

Dear Mr. President:

We are writing you because we are convinced that current American policy toward Iraq is not succeeding, and that we may soon face a threat in the Middle East more serious than any we have known since the end of the Cold War. In your upcoming State of the Union Address, you have an opportunity to chart a clear and determined course for meeting this threat. We urge you to seize that opportunity, and to enunciate a new strategy that would secure the interests of the U.S. and our friends and allies around the world. That strategy should aim, above all, at the removal of Saddam Hussein’s regime from power. We stand ready to offer our full support in this difficult but necessary endeavor.

[...]

Given the magnitude of the threat, the current policy, which depends for its success upon the steadfastness of our coalition partners and upon the cooperation of Saddam Hussein, is dangerously inadequate. The only acceptable strategy is one that eliminates the possibility that Iraq will be able to use or threaten to use weapons of mass destruction. In the near term, this means a willingness to undertake military action as diplomacy is clearly failing. In the long term, it means removing Saddam Hussein and his regime from power. That now needs to become the aim of American foreign policy.

We urge you to articulate this aim, and to turn your Administration's attention to implementing a strategy for removing Saddam's regime from power. This will require a full complement of diplomatic, political and military efforts. Although we are fully aware of the dangers and difficulties in implementing this policy, we believe the dangers of failing to do so are far greater. We believe the U.S. has the authority under existing UN resolutions to take the necessary steps, including military steps, to protect our vital interests in the Gulf. In any case, American policy cannot continue to be crippled by a misguided insistence on unanimity in the UN Security Council.

Sincerely,

Elliott Abrams Richard L. Armitage William J. Bennett

Jeffrey Bergner John Bolton Paula Dobriansky

Francis Fukuyama Robert Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad

William Kristol Richard Perle Peter W. Rodman

Donald Rumsfeld William Schneider, Jr. Vin Weber

Paul Wolfowitz R. James Woolsey Robert B. Zoellick


See also:

Publications/Reports

Specifically:

Rebuilding America's Defenses: Strategy, Forces and Resources For a New Century
A Report of the Project for the New American Century
September 2000

Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor...

and

And advanced forms of biological warfare that can “target” specific genotypes may transform biological warfare from the realm of terror to a politically useful tool."
 
BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSHH!!!!! FOX NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOZ!!!!!!! Jeez who cares? The Iraq War is over. Move on for God's sake. The Hopey Changeys really are pretty boring at this point.
 
Bush sucessfully concluded the Iraq war with a
check-mark.jpg
in the win column.
 
Yep, mission accomplished. Bush's cronies in the MIC made a shit-ton of money. So, in that aspect, Bush did "win" the war. But not in any other aspect.
 
"BOOOOOOOOOOOOOSSHH!! AN FOX NOOOOOOOOOOOZ!!!" My God,when will these Hopey Changey Loons get some new material? What a Snooze Fest.

Their keeping this on the front pages of the MSM (easily accomplished by instructions to editors and program directors throughout the liberal media conglomerate) takes heat off the breaking scandal concerning Al "Shyster" Gore, Global "warming", Cap and Tax, save-the-world-from-destruction-with-taxation movement.

Al and Barry are just dyin' for some new scandals and discoveries of "illegalities" tied to Bush to keep voters occupied and unaware of the corruption and trickery being used to justify taxing us into total submission.
 
UK diplomat: US was 'hell bent' on Iraq invasion

The ex-diplomat, who served as Britain's envoy in Iraq after the invasion, said serious preparations for the war had begun in early 2002 and took on an unstoppable momentum.

Notice the significance of this date, boys and girls?

UK diplomat: US was 'hell bent' on Iraq invasion - Yahoo! News

This is not the first claim that was made about Bush planning to invade Iraq before he even took over the presidency. But telling that to the current crop of the GOP is a waste of time. These people are touched in the head and believe that Bush was God Almighty.

My fervent hope is that they keep up with their delusions, both good and bad. They are moving steadily to extinction, because they cannot be reached or reasoned with.
 

Forum List

Back
Top