And just when you thought Bosnia was safe...

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by DavidS, Dec 28, 2008.

  1. DavidS
    Offline

    DavidS Anti-Tea Party Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,811
    Thanks Received:
    766
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    New York, NY
    Ratings:
    +767
    Will Bosnia Test the Obama Administration? - Yahoo! News

    Could an old triumph be coming back to haunt the Clintonites who are joining President-elect Barack Obama's staff? If there's one foreign policy achievement that Clintonites are proud of, it's Bosnia. Some 13 years ago, during Bill Clinton's second term, a U.S.-led military intervention stopped the carnage in the former Yugoslav republic, followed by a peace deal forged by then Assistant Secretary of State Richard Holbrooke and signed in Dayton, Ohio. The deal, which carved Bosnia into two ethnically based statelets while retaining a weak common government, was so successful that vice-president-elect Joe Biden suggested it should be used as a model for ending the sectarian war in Iraq.

    But, once again, Bosnia is in deep crisis, with tensions running high between ethnic Serbs, Croats and Muslims (now officially called Bosniaks). There is even talk of a new war. Might this be a sudden test for the new Obama Administration? (See the Top 10 Underreported Stories of 2008.)

    The rhetoric out of the country is alarming. Bosnian Serb leader Milorad Dodik publicly declared that he doesn't believe the common state has a future, and occasionally hints that his Serb-dominated statelet may secede from Bosnia. From the other side of the ethnic divide, leading Bosniak politician Haris Silajdzic repeatedly calls for the abolishment of the Serbian Republic, which he sees as a product of a Serbian ethnic cleansing campaign during the war. "It appears that the status quo created by genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes has acquired a degree of sanctity in Bosnia and Herzegovina and that genocide and ethnic cleansing are being rewarded," Silajdzic warned in a recent letter to the leaders of the European Union and NATO.

    Even Holbrooke, the chief architect of the Dayton peace agreement, is worried. "It's time to pay attention to Bosnia again, if we don't want things to get nasty very quickly," Holbrooke said in a letter co-signed by Paddy Ashdown, the former chief of Office of High Representative (OHR), the international supervising and administrative body in Bosnia. Both Holbrooke and Ashdown claim that Bosnia is regressing, and that the Western powers should swiftly and strongly engage to prevent a renewed conflict and ensure Bosnia's evolution into "a functional and E.U.-compatible state."

    Meanwhile, insults are flying across the ethnic divide, spurred by tabloid media and populist politicians from both sides. Two weeks ago, Dodik's government decided to remove the adjective "Bosnian" from the names of several towns in the Serbian Republic. Meanwhile, in once multi-ethnic Sarajevo, a decree by Bosniak officials introducing compulsory lessons in the Koran to kindergarteners prompted remaining Serbs and Croats to pull their children out of school. "Instead of showing some statesmanship, Bosnian political leaders are practicing petty politics", complains the current OHR chief, Slovakian diplomat Miroslav Lajcak.

    The divisive ethnic vitriol is further fueled by political calculation. Nationalism sells - as Dodik's and Silajdzic's parties learned in recent local elections, when they won the bulk of the vote in their respective constituencies. The politics of ethnocentrism props up the parties that really don't have anything else to offer the populace. The economy has been in deep trouble even before the international financial crisis. Unemployment and corruption are among highest in the region. Basic goods suffer from inflation. According to a recent study, about 70% of Bosnians below the age of 30 have abandoned hope for a better future at home, and would rather emigrate to the West.

    So is Bosnia about to dissolve in another bloody mess? Some analysts caution that the talk of war is overblown and overheated. Some real progress has been achieved in the past 13 years. The peace has been sustained; a high proportion of refugees have returned to their homes; and despite harsh words, no serious incidents of ethnic violence has occurred in recent years. In June 2008, Bosnia signed a crucial agreement with the E.U., putting it on the road to membership. Most importantly, the country's armed forces were recently unified and, unlike Bosnia's political apparatus, put under central command. The military is taking steps to join NATO. "People do talk of another war, but I don't think it can really happen again", says Muharem Bazdulj, a prominent Sarajevo-based writer and a columnist for the daily Oslobodjenje newspaper. "The fact that the military, of all institutions, just successfully underwent drastic reform is a proof of that. But we do need long-term stability, and that requires joint effort both at local and the international level", Bazdulj told TIME.

    Other observers agree. "Talk of possible war in Bosnia today is foolish and irresponsible" says former OHR official Gerald Knaus, who now heads the European Stability Initiative, a Berlin-based think-tank. "There is no more chance of war in Bosnia today than there is in Cyprus or Belgium." Knaus blames the current troubles on the "irresponsible political elites." That political accomodation that allowed the war to end 13 years ago, however, will continue to roil the country's politics for the foreseeable future. Knaus sees no easy way out of the Serb-Bosniak stalemate. "No miraculous constitutional reform plan and no powerful international foreign mission can overcome this: both have been tried for many years," he told TIME.

    With the U.S. in transition, and the E.U. preoccupied with its own troubles, there's not much chance that Bosnia, short of war, will get the attention from the West to change its intractable status quo. As for the local politicians, they have learned long ago that selling bigotry at home (with its nuisance value abroad) is the best way to stay afloat. Until the Bosnians decide to elect better leaders, they will just have to bear the weight of an uneasy peace.
     
  2. Lycurgus
    Offline

    Lycurgus Who is Obama, really...??

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,743
    Thanks Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Midwest
    Ratings:
    +258
    Go ask the Macedonian's how well Clinton did or the Greeks. I'm not at all surprised to read this, things have been brewing for a long time. The Butcher certainly had to go, but, the many other issues, IMO, the real issues were never properly addressed.
     
  3. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    Why isn't the EU dealing with this?

    Why must the USA step up the plate every time?
     
  4. WillowTree
    Online

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,120
    Thanks Received:
    10,159
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,664
    Wel, I am content in the knowledge that a Democrat is in office and at least for the next four years the US of KKA will keep it's nose out of the rest of the world's business. Amen?
     
  5. Lycurgus
    Offline

    Lycurgus Who is Obama, really...??

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2008
    Messages:
    1,743
    Thanks Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Midwest
    Ratings:
    +258


    In this case, I couldn't agree more and I asked that many times back then.

    If ever there was a situation that the EU (Europe) was responsible to deal with, it was this one. Further, they were and are more than capable of doing so. Right after Clinton was finished, had Macedonia and Greece protected their borders the way their citizens had wanted them to, the situation would have gotten very ugly and very sticky. The only thing which truly prevented that was the name dispute between Greece and Macedonia. Had they been able to work together and move Greek forces into Macedonia, the fighting would have continued and escalated.

    I don't think Clinton did a bad job, but, it was never properly wrapped up and the EU was let off the hook, prior, during and after. We should have never had a reason to get involved except for distant support.
     
  6. WillowTree
    Online

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,120
    Thanks Received:
    10,159
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,664
    why should anybody deal with it? As the left is so often to say, "The US cannot be the policemen" of the world. So, why would we expect Europe to be? Just let the Bosniaks and the Croats and Serbs duke it out til the last man stands. Why would we care if they fill up graves? No, we do not and should not and cannnot. Our troops are too thin!.. I'm taking leftist think lessons! :lol::lol::lol:
     
  7. auditor0007
    Offline

    auditor0007 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2008
    Messages:
    12,566
    Thanks Received:
    2,255
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Toledo, OH
    Ratings:
    +3,218
    Good question. Why is it that the US spends approximately half of total military spending for the entire planet? The time has come for the the US to stop being the world police. That doesn't mean we should dismantle our entire military, but we can't be the defender of every country on the planet either.
     
  8. WillowTree
    Online

    WillowTree Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    68,120
    Thanks Received:
    10,159
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Ratings:
    +14,664


    :clap2:


    I'll vote for that! And that means nobody gets help. See how that works out. We gotta dissolve NATO though.
     
  9. bk1983
    Offline

    bk1983 Off too Kuwait..

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,431
    Thanks Received:
    109
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +109
    You do realize it was the Republicans who were opposed to NATO and used to preach a non intervention foreign policy.. Since you earlier posted that only the left doesn't want the US to be the policeman of the world, that couldn't be further from the truth,,
     

Share This Page