And in the latest climate change news....



And the craziest amongst us start to howl....
There are some 40 papers out, in the last 2 years, that show mans contribution can not be discerned from noise in our climatic system. Even the hard left wackos and nut jobs are beginning to see the light..

Its going to take some time to undue the lies being taught to our children..
 
You found another denier idiot to parrot.

Good for you!

Out here in reality there is no debate, climate change is real.

Get used to it.
 
And how many scientists have a different opinion? You assume him credible and the others not because you want to believe one thing over the other. Let me know when NASA, the UCS and scientific institutions the world over announce a change in what they believe to be happening.
 
You found another denier idiot to parrot.

Good for you!

Out here in reality there is no debate, climate change is real.

Get used to it.

He's not an idiot. It's not as black and white as people suggest. There is a lot we still don't understand which leaves room for skepticism. What's significant though is the fact that the vast majority of the most qualified people on Earth have come to a similar conclusion based on the evidence that is available, and new evidence and information seems to further support their claims. These are all very educated and intelligent people, and we should all be listening to what all of them have to say.
 
And how many scientists have a different opinion? You assume him credible and the others not because you want to believe one thing over the other. Let me know when NASA, the UCS and scientific institutions the world over announce a change in what they believe to be happening.
You mean their political arms? Because that is all your beloved "Consensus" means.. The political arms agree...
 
You mean their political arms? Because that is all your beloved "Consensus" means.. The political arms agree...

You're ignorant and I'm not going to waste my energy on another 50 page discussion. You can't be convinced of anything you don't want to be convinced of. You're a loyal and hardened partisan that will never change.
 
What is it about cleaner air and water that freaks out the right so much? :dunno:
 
What is it about cleaner air and water that freaks out the right so much? :dunno:

They think global warming is a hoax and an effort to create global mandates that will one day lead to the creation of a one world government. Most conservatives are not against cleaning up the water and reducing air pollution.
 
And how many scientists have a different opinion? You assume him credible and the others not because you want to believe one thing over the other. Let me know when NASA, the UCS and scientific institutions the world over announce a change in what they believe to be happening.
That is some magical thinking there buddy.

Explain to us how somebody changing their mind about what they believe is happening can actually change what is happening.

If you cannot, you might be in a doomsday cult.
 
What is it about cleaner air and water that freaks out the right so much? :dunno:

They think global warming is a hoax and an effort to create global mandates that will one day lead to the creation of a one world government. Most conservatives are not against cleaning up the water and reducing air pollution.
That's pretty paranoid, which is why they have so many guns?
 
Explain to us how somebody changing their mind about what they believe is happening can actually change what is happening.

If you cannot, you might be in a doomsday cult.

What?

What is happening is what is happening. The opinions of the most qualified people on Earth should be held in high regard, though. Nobody understands more and so nobody has a better chance of getting it right.
 
That's pretty paranoid, which is why they have so many guns?

Some of their paranoia is valid in my opinion, but not in this case. Scientists the world over are not in on a conspiracy to lie to the world about what is really happening. The notion that a conspiracy that large and all-encompassing could even float at all is absurd. These people don't understand that scientists get rich and famous from destroying the work of other scientists. Every climate scientist on Earth would LOVE to be the one that proves AGW is bullshit.
 
You mean their political arms? Because that is all your beloved "Consensus" means.. The political arms agree...

You're ignorant and I'm not going to waste my energy on another 50 page discussion. You can't be convinced of anything you don't want to be convinced of. You're a loyal and hardened partisan that will never change.
Says the idiot who believes propaganda and refuses to look at the real science being done by real scientists..

You obviously didn't see how it blew up when the AGU put it to a vote of their member's...It didn't end well..

The AGU no longer states the science is settled after 80% of respondents in their union dissented.

No Consensus View on Climate Change Science: AGU Statement on Global Warming Disputed | FreedomWorks

When you ask precise questions about key points the veil is torn away and the political arm is shown frauds..
 


And the craziest amongst us start to howl....
There are some 40 papers out, in the last 2 years, that show mans contribution can not be discerned from noise in our climatic system. Even the hard left wackos and nut jobs are beginning to see the light..

Its going to take some time to undue the lies being taught to our children..
Post, link, and quote to one of those papers. I would bet all my money that you can't.
 
You found another denier idiot to parrot.

Good for you!

Out here in reality there is no debate, climate change is real.

Get used to it.


This must of been your thesis in college, huh?



"If we don't take action, then in 12 years we will have to explain why the world hasn't ended and come up with a new number," one UN scientist warned. "This is a very serious threat, and we urge everyone to hand control of the economy to the government immediately before we have no more time left to change the timeline again."

The scientific consensus is that roughly 10-12 years from now, the world will be flooded with new doomsday predictions. This can all be avoided if we overhaul the economy and become socialists, according to non-political, unbiased sciencey type guys.

"Should we not change our ways, our old predictions will melt, dangerously raising the chance of us having to move the goalposts again," said Al Gore. "Do you really want me to write another book, film another movie, and go on another tour in my private jet just because you dingbats couldn't be bothered to alter your lifestyles? I don't think so. Let's all get on board with this 12-year figure, or we'll have to push back the date again."
 
You found another denier idiot to parrot.

Good for you!

Out here in reality there is no debate, climate change is real.

Get used to it.


This must of been your thesis in college, huh?



"If we don't take action, then in 12 years we will have to explain why the world hasn't ended and come up with a new number," one UN scientist warned. "This is a very serious threat, and we urge everyone to hand control of the economy to the government immediately before we have no more time left to change the timeline again."

The scientific consensus is that roughly 10-12 years from now, the world will be flooded with new doomsday predictions. This can all be avoided if we overhaul the economy and become socialists, according to non-political, unbiased sciencey type guys.

"Should we not change our ways, our old predictions will melt, dangerously raising the chance of us having to move the goalposts again," said Al Gore. "Do you really want me to write another book, film another movie, and go on another tour in my private jet just because you dingbats couldn't be bothered to alter your lifestyles? I don't think so. Let's all get on board with this 12-year figure, or we'll have to push back the date again."


BTW We don't even think you leave your bomb shelter..


Colorado springs today..



73176-004-29CC8180.jpg
 
Post, link, and quote to one of those papers. I would bet all my money that you can't.

They exist, but the part he either leaves out or doesn't understand is 40 studies pales in comparison to the number of studies that have been done and say something else in recent years. He's comparing 40 studies to thousands and thousands.
 
Post, link, and quote to one of those papers. I would bet all my money that you can't.

They exist, but the part he either leaves out or doesn't understand is 40 studies pales in comparison to the number of studies that have been done and say something else in recent years. He's comparing 40 studies to thousands and thousands.
I am sure they exist, that is not the challenge. The challenge is did he actually read one? So I challenge him to quote and link. Chances are, if he/she finds a study it does not state what they claim. So, always demand to see the study. It will never be produced.
 

Forum List

Back
Top