and finally, the REAL Wikileaks bombshell...

Discussion in 'Politics' started by JiggsCasey, Dec 2, 2010.

  1. JiggsCasey
    Offline

    JiggsCasey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    991
    Thanks Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +128
    Watch the Big U.S. media bury this story, and the implications behind it... Just like it did with ISI's undeniable involvement with facilitating 9/11.

    Slight bombshell, but let's not cover it. :rolleyes:

    US defended Pak, shielded ISI chief after Mumbai attacks?

    NEW DELHI: In yet another Wikileaks disclosure, which could lead to awkwardness in Indo-US relations, a leaked cable suggests that the US might have tried to not just suppress information related to involvement of Pakistani agencies in 26/11 but also defend ISI. The cable from US embassy in Pakistan to secretary of state Hillary Clinton in January 2009 says "premature dissemination" of this information could escalate tension between India and Pakistan.

    It's also clear from another cable sent in the same month that the US tried to shield ISI chief Ahmed Shuja Pasha from any fallout of investigations into 26/11 by India as the findings clearly suggested that ISI played a role in the attacks. The cable from the US embassy in Islamabad says India should be urged to delay the release of the information about their findings "until intelligence and law enforcement sharing with Pakistan (and with us) has been able to move forward".

    Read more: US defended Pak, shielded ISI chief after 26/11 strikes? - The Times of India US defended Pak, shielded ISI chief after 26/11 strikes? - The Times of India

    What a surprise that Assange is sudddenly wanted as a "rapist" :
     
  2. blackmajic
    Offline

    blackmajic Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2010
    Messages:
    2
    Thanks Received:
    0
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Location:
    Atlanta Ga
    Ratings:
    +0
    I think this is being done on purpose..To hurt America, andd I think Obama hates us enough to allow it..Look how he wont even talk about it..

    No other time has sensitive information leaked, again and again to the same person..This is so careless it's OBVIOUSLY on purpose
     
  3. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    Yea, it would have been far better to sit back and watch India and Pakistan go to war. That would have been the smart thing to do, clearly.



    Christ on a bike, the OP is one dumb fuck.
     
  4. JiggsCasey
    Offline

    JiggsCasey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    991
    Thanks Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +128
    LOL.

    Now then, any comment on the U.S.'s consistent habit of shielding known facilitators of terror? You know, from Reagan onward?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. JiggsCasey
    Offline

    JiggsCasey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    991
    Thanks Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +128
    Hey look everyone! It's our very own Anne Coulter, who pretended Glenn Beck was "factually accurate!"

    So, by your situational ethics and curious rationalization above, the risk of war is too great for ever holding terrorist facilitators accountable? Cool.

    Wait, I thought your hero said we would "make no distinction between these terrorist killers and those who harbor them?" Gosh, which is it? I mean, afterall, you're the smart one.

    I can't wait for your spin and sugar coating to come. Should be excellent.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. JiggsCasey
    Offline

    JiggsCasey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    991
    Thanks Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +128
    *bump for Anne's latest disappearing act*
     
  7. Dr.Traveler
    Offline

    Dr.Traveler Mathematician

    Joined:
    Aug 31, 2009
    Messages:
    3,952
    Thanks Received:
    652
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    In a Non-Euclidean Manifold
    Ratings:
    +1,054
    This isn't a surprise. Pakistan's fingerprints were all over the Taliban, and the majority of the highjackers on 9/11 were Saudi.

    So who are our biggest allies in the War on Terror now? Pakistan and Saudi Arabia.

    That's really not a big surprise if you study up on your Cold War history as the GWOT has been fought with a Cold War mentality for the most part.
     
  8. JiggsCasey
    Offline

    JiggsCasey VIP Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2010
    Messages:
    991
    Thanks Received:
    120
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +128
    Anne? Still curious... Does "winning the war on terror" take a back seat to some new scenario you insist WILL happen if we don't keep cowering to Pakistan - war?

    LOL

    I know you're on this web site 24/7, so I have little doubt you've seen this question three times now. Please clarify your very compromised position on this matter, so that we can all behold conservative situational ethics on full display.
     
    Last edited: Dec 3, 2010
  9. LibocalypseNow
    Offline

    LibocalypseNow Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2009
    Messages:
    12,337
    Thanks Received:
    1,356
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +1,357
    We should get out of Pakistan too. And we definitely shouldn't continue giving them $Billions and Weapons. Blow Back is definitely gonna hurt us on this at some point. Pakistanis do not like Americans. This is fact. So why are we pouring $Billions in tax payer cash into that Hell Hole? Why are we giving them all these advanced weapons? Why are our politicians continuing to pretend the Pakistanis are our friends? I guess it's just denial at this point. All that cash & weapons invested yet nothing to show for it. The Pakistanis just take our cash & weapons and then screw us. It really is that simple. Time to quit spending hard earned American tax payer cash on them.
     
  10. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    You know jack shit, as is evidenced by each of your moronic posts. And, since you know so much about me, you should have worked out that I tend to ignore whiners who think they're somehow worthy of my attention.

    I'll respond as and when I'm inclined to.... hold your breath.
     

Share This Page