Anatomical impossibility

LilOlLady

Gold Member
Apr 20, 2009
10,017
1,312
190
Reno, NV
ANATOMICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.
 
ANATOMICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.

So you believe that Bill Clinton did NOT have sex with Monica??

Just a quick clue for you; oral and anal sex are still sex. Plus, plenty of straight couples engage in those same activities.

Other than that, you gave an excellent paragraph of reasons why the church should not sanction gay marriage. But none of that aplies to federal, state, and local laws.
 
ANATOMICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.

So God doesn't condone homosexuality. Great. Now show me where the Constitution condemns homosexuality.

Your personal beliefs should have no effect on other people who don't share your faith. Just as the way I lead my own life has no effect on you.
 
ANATOMICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.

Marriage pre dates Christianity.

True story. :thup:
 
ANATOMICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.

So you believe that Bill Clinton did NOT have sex with Monica??

Just a quick clue for you; oral and anal sex are still sex. Plus, plenty of straight couples engage in those same activities.

Other than that, you gave an excellent paragraph of reasons why the church should not sanction gay marriage. But none of that aplies to federal, state, and local laws.

You missed the point? I said GOD did not create oral or anal sex, Dr. Ruth did.
 
ANATOMICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.

So you believe that Bill Clinton did NOT have sex with Monica??

Just a quick clue for you; oral and anal sex are still sex. Plus, plenty of straight couples engage in those same activities.

Other than that, you gave an excellent paragraph of reasons why the church should not sanction gay marriage. But none of that aplies to federal, state, and local laws.

You missed the point? I said GOD did not create oral or anal sex, Dr. Ruth did.

How can the Christian God have created sexual intercourse if people were having sex before Christianity even existed? Before any religion ever existed for that matter?
 
Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.

By your ‘reasoning,’ infertile opposite-sex couples should be disallowed from marrying; or an older opposite-sex married couple should be compelled to divorce once the wife realizes menopause.
 
So Dr. Ruth created oral sex. The ancient Egyptians would be pretty surprised to hear that.

If you consider people you know nothing about are despicable, immoral, and perverted, then that's pretty despicable, immoral, and perverted.
 
Last edited:
ANATOMICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.

Marriage pre dates Christianity.

True story. :thup:
More news, God predates the sin of the choice of homosexuality.
 
So you believe that Bill Clinton did NOT have sex with Monica??

Just a quick clue for you; oral and anal sex are still sex. Plus, plenty of straight couples engage in those same activities.

Other than that, you gave an excellent paragraph of reasons why the church should not sanction gay marriage. But none of that aplies to federal, state, and local laws.

You missed the point? I said GOD did not create oral or anal sex, Dr. Ruth did.

How can the Christian God have created sexual intercourse if people were having sex before Christianity even existed? Before any religion ever existed for that matter?
Because God is God, not just the Christian God. Gay is mans sick thought.
 
ANATOMICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.

Since Christian doctrine is so important in this matter, why don't you try forgiving them? And at the same time remember it's God's job to judge, not yours.
 
More news, God predates the sin of the choice of homosexuality.

Because God is God, not just the Christian God. Gay is mans sick thought.
And?

This has no legal or Constitutional relevance.

You’re entitled to your hate and ignorance, but make no attempt to codify that hate and ignorance into secular law.
 
ANATOMICAL IMPOSSIBILITY.

Same sex marriage is more the family and love. Men were not created anatomically to have sex with each other and neither were women. Sex is a big part of a marriage. Reproduction is a big part. Sex and reproduction is an anatomical impossibility. God settled this issue more than 6 thousand years ago when he created man and women. He did not create oral or anal sex. Dr. Ruth did. God called gay sex as “despicable” “immoral“ “perverted” “inflamed with lust” deserving of death. Received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. Which meant they are not deserving of the kingdom of God. Not execution.
We have got so far away from what is right that we do not know what is right or wrong anymore.

Marriage pre dates Christianity.

True story. :thup:

Marriage predates you too, but you seem to have an opinion on it.
 
More news, God predates the sin of the choice of homosexuality.

Because God is God, not just the Christian God. Gay is mans sick thought.
And?

This has no legal or Constitutional relevance.

You’re entitled to your hate and ignorance, but make no attempt to codify that hate and ignorance into secular law.

I agree with this. Codifying personal superstition is the path to to theocracy, (in fact it is the definition of theocracy.) And I don't think anyone wants that.
 
More news, God predates the sin of the choice of homosexuality.

Because God is God, not just the Christian God. Gay is mans sick thought.
And?

This has no legal or Constitutional relevance.

You’re entitled to your hate and ignorance, but make no attempt to codify that hate and ignorance into secular law.

I agree with this. Codifying personal superstition is the path to to theocracy, (in fact it is the definition of theocracy.) And I don't think anyone wants that.

That is not the definition of theocracy.
 
And?

This has no legal or Constitutional relevance.

You’re entitled to your hate and ignorance, but make no attempt to codify that hate and ignorance into secular law.

I agree with this. Codifying personal superstition is the path to to theocracy, (in fact it is the definition of theocracy.) And I don't think anyone wants that.

That is not the definition of theocracy.

Thanks for the insight. It is actually.

Theocracy
Noun:
A system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god.
 
I agree with this. Codifying personal superstition is the path to to theocracy, (in fact it is the definition of theocracy.) And I don't think anyone wants that.

That is not the definition of theocracy.

Thanks for the insight. It is actually.

Theocracy
Noun:
A system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god.

See, nothing about personal superstition, you learned a new word today.
 
That is not the definition of theocracy.

Thanks for the insight. It is actually.

Theocracy
Noun:
A system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god.

See, nothing about personal superstition, you learned a new word today.

Ok, you can interpret theocracy however you want. It is a government that makes its laws based on religious superstition. Why is this so hard for you?
 
Thanks for the insight. It is actually.

Theocracy
Noun:
A system of government in which priests rule in the name of God or a god.

See, nothing about personal superstition, you learned a new word today.

Ok, you can interpret theocracy however you want. It is a government that makes its laws based on religious superstition. Why is this so hard for you?

Conservatives don’t take kindly to facts, they conflict with rightist dogma.
 
See, nothing about personal superstition, you learned a new word today.

Ok, you can interpret theocracy however you want. It is a government that makes its laws based on religious superstition. Why is this so hard for you?

Conservatives don’t take kindly to facts, they conflict with rightist dogma.

I suppose you have a point there. It's easy to believe absurdities when you can allow yourself to be Christian.
 

Forum List

Back
Top