An Open Letter to the Troops: You’re Not Defending Our Freedoms!

Discussion in 'Military' started by dvinman, Jun 5, 2011.

  1. dvinman
    Offline

    dvinman VIP Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2009
    Messages:
    458
    Thanks Received:
    65
    Trophy Points:
    78
    Ratings:
    +65
    Dear Troops:

    On Memorial Day — some people asserted, once again, that you are “defending our freedoms” overseas.

    Nothing could be further from the truth. Those people are just repeating tired old mantras. The reality is that you are not defending our freedoms with your actions overseas. In fact, it is the exact opposite. Your actions overseas are placing our freedoms here at home in ever-greater jeopardy.

    Consider your occupation of Iraq, a country that, as you know, never attacked the United States, making it the defender in the war and the United States the aggressor. Think about that: Every single person that the troops have killed, maimed, or tortured in Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

    Yet, the countless victims of the U.S. invasion and occupation of Iraq have friends and relatives, many of whom have become filled with anger and rage and who now would stop at nothing to retaliate with terrorist attacks against Americans.

    Pray tell: How does that constitute defending our freedoms?

    It was no different prior to 9/11. At the end of the Persian Gulf War, the troops intentionally destroyed Iraq’s water and sewage facilities after a Pentagon study showed that this would help spread infectious illnesses among the Iraqi people.

    It worked. For 11 years after that, the troops enforced the cruel and brutal sanctions on Iraq that killed hundreds of thousands of Iraqi children. (See “America’s Peacetime Crimes against Iraq” by Anthony Gregory.) You’ll recall U.S. Ambassador to the UN Madeleine Albright’s infamous statement that the deaths of half-a-million Iraqi children from the sanctions were “worth it.”

    By “it” she meant the attempted ouster of Saddam Hussein from power. You will recall that he was a dictator who was the U.S. government’s ally and partner during the 1980s, when the United States was furnishing him with those infamous WMDs that U.S. officials later used to excite the American people into supporting your invasion of Iraq.

    The truth is that 9/11 furnished U.S. officials with the excuse to do what their sanctions (and the deaths of all those Iraqi children) had failed to accomplish: ridding Iraq of Saddam Hussein and replacing him with a U.S-approved regime.

    That’s what your post-9/11 invasion of Iraq was all about — to achieve the regime change that the pre-9/11 deadly sanctions that killed all those children had failed to achieve.

    No, not mushroom clouds, not freedom, not democracy, and certainly not defending our freedoms here at home. Just plain old regime change.

    In the process, all that you — the troops — have done with your invasion and occupation of Iraq is produce even more enmity toward the United States by people in the Middle East, especially those Iraqis who have lost loved ones or friends in the process or simply watched their country be destroyed.

    In principle, it’s no different with Afghanistan. I’d estimate that 99 percent of the people the troops have killed, maimed, or tortured in that country had absolutely nothing to do with 9/11.

    Why did you invade Afghanistan or, more precisely, why did President Bush order you to do so?

    No, not because the Taliban participated in the 9/11 attacks and, no, not because the Taliban were even aware that the attacks were going to take place

    President Bush ordered the troops to invade Afghanistan — and, of course, kill Afghan citizens in the process — because the Afghan government – the Taliban — refused to comply with his unconditional extradition demand. You will recall that the Taliban offered to turn bin Laden over to an independent tribunal to stand trial upon the receipt of evidence from the United States indicating his complicity in the 9/11 attacks.

    Bush responded to the Taliban’s offer by issuing his order to the troops to invade Afghanistan, kill Afghans, and occupy the country. In the process, U.S. officials installed one of the most crooked, corrupt, and dictatorial rulers it could find to govern the country, one who is so incompetent he cannot even hide the manifest fraud by which he has supposedly been elected to office.

    In the process of installing and defending the Karzai regime, the troops have killed brides, grooms, children, fathers, mothers, brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, uncles, aunts, cousins, friends, and countrymen, most of whom never attacked the United States on 9/11 or at any other time. They simply became “collateral damage” or “bad guys” for having the audacity to oppose the invasion and occupation of their country by a foreign regime. (It should be noted for the record that U.S. officials considered these types of “bad guys,” as well as Osama bin Laden and other fundamentalist Muslims, to be “good guys” when they were trying to oust Soviet troops from Afghanistan.)

    Was there another way to bring bin Laden to justice? Yes, the criminal-justice route, which was the route used after the 1993 terrorist attack on the World Trade Center.

    That’s right. Same target, different date. In fact, the accused terrorists — Ramzi Yousef in 1993 and Osama bin Laden in 2001 — were ultimately located in the same country, Pakistan.

    In Yousef’s case, he was arrested some three years after the attack, brought back to the United States, prosecuted, and convicted in federal district court. He’s now serving a life sentence in a federal penitentiary.

    No invasions, no bombings, no occupations, no killing of countless innocent people, no torture, no war on terrorism, and no anger and rage that such actions inevitably would have produced among the victims, their families, and friends.

    In bin Laden’s case, we instead got a military invasion and occupation of Afghanistan, where the troops have killed, maimed, tortured, and hurt countless people who had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks.

    How in the world have your invasions and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq defended our freedoms here at home? Indeed, how have the assassinations and bombings in Pakistan, Yemen, Libya, and who knows where else defended our freedoms?

    All these things have accomplished is keeping foreigners angry at us, thereby subjecting us to the constant and ever-growing threat of terrorist retaliation here at home. As I have pointed out before, the U.S. military — that is, you, the troops — have become the biggest terrorist-producing machine in history. Every time you kill some Iraqi or Afghan citizen, even when accidental, ten more offer to take his place out of anger and rage.

    That’s the same thing that was happening prior to 9/11. In fact, there were some, including those of us here at The Future of Freedom Foundation, who were warning prior to 9/11 that unless the U.S. Empire stopped what it was doing to people in the Middle East (including the deadly sanctions on Iraq, the support of Middle East dictators, the stationing of U.S. troops near Islamic holy lands, and the unconditional money and armaments to the Israeli regime), Americans would be increasingly subject to terrorist attacks. On 9/11, we were proven right, unfortunately. (See Blowback: The Costs and Consequences of American Empire by Chalmers Johnson.)

    How does the constant threat of terrorist retaliation arising from your actions in Iraq and Afghanistan make us freer here at home, especially when you — the troops — are responsible for engendering the anger and rage that culminates in such threats, owing to what you are doing to people over there?

    Consider also what the U.S. government does to our freedoms here at home as a direct consequence of the terrorist threat that you, the troops, are producing over there. It uses that threat of terrorism to infringe upon our freedoms here at home! You know what I mean — the fondling at the airports, the 10-year-old Patriot Act, the illegal spying on Americans, the indefinite detention, the torture, the kangaroo tribunals, Gitmo, and the entire war on terrorism — all necessary, they tell us, to keep us safe from the terrorists — that is, the people you all are producing with your actions over there.

    In other words, if you all weren’t producing an endless stream of terrorists with your invasions, occupations, torture, assassinations, bombings, and Gitmo, the U.S. government — the entity you are working for — would no longer have that excuse for taking away our freedoms.

    This past Sunday, the Washington Post carried an article about American wives who were recently greeting their husbands on their return from Afghanistan. Newlywed Anne Krolicki, 24, commented to her husband on the death of one of her friends’ husband: “It’s a pointless war,” she said.

    That lady has her head on straight. She’s has a grip on reality, doesn’t deal in tired old mantras, and speaks the truth. Every U.S. soldier who dies in Iraq and Afghanistan dies for nothing, which was the same thing that some 58,000 men of my generation died for in Vietnam.

    Please don’t write me to tell me that you all are good people or that you’re “patriots” for simply following whatever orders you are given. All that is irrelevant. What matters is what you are doing over there. And what you are doing is not defending our freedoms, you are jeopardizing them

    -Jacob G. Hornberger. President The Future of Freedom Foundation
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,117
    Thanks Received:
    9,265
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,395
    That letter might work if addressed to a drafted military.
     
  3. BolshevikHunter
    Offline

    BolshevikHunter BANNED

    Joined:
    Aug 2, 2009
    Messages:
    2,265
    Thanks Received:
    273
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Northern, CALIFORNIA
    Ratings:
    +273
    I think that because of the fact that you are blaming our Men and Women for serving their Country, you're not gonna get many people to respect what you're saying. When people decide to serve, they do it because they want to serve the United States of America and defend their country.

    Listen, They don't decide what politicians get elected or their foreign policy. Do I agree with SOME of what you have said, Yes I do. I also understand that by attempting to influence these good people, that you might prevent the internationalists from brainwashing our young people even more. However, If you want to prevent people from supporting this New World Order, You might want to start prior to them enlisting. Once they give their oath, and I personally understand that, You have no grounds to judge these good people for their good intentions.

    = Never connect people in the service with Politicians or their foreign policy. Nobody can blame them for honoring their oath. No matter how much alot of us know about the corruption that is going on. We should always support those who put their life on the line once they are on the ground. Just my personal opinion on the matter because I have thought about it alot.

    Check out "House to House" By SSG David Bellavia. It's his personal account of his experience in the Battle Of Fallujah, In Iraq. This book will shock anyone with a heart, and no matter who you are politically (unless you're a scum bag) you will learn to respect those who serve our Country no matter what the motives of the politicians that control them are. ~BH
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,559
    Thanks Received:
    5,900
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,973
    No one claimed Iraq had anything to do with 9-11. And Afghanistan was invaded because it was harboring Bin Laden and refused to turn him over.

    EPIC FAIL.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. Toome
    Offline

    Toome Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2009
    Messages:
    906
    Thanks Received:
    258
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +259
    Well, have to admit that it's pretty gutsy to post such a message online from the comfort of one's living room. Kinda like jerking off and claiming to know all there is to know about sex.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  6. Douger
    Offline

    Douger BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2009
    Messages:
    12,323
    Thanks Received:
    915
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Not fucking there !
    Ratings:
    +915
    You can't defend something you don't have.
     
  7. old navy
    Offline

    old navy <<< Action Figures

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2011
    Messages:
    1,740
    Thanks Received:
    378
    Trophy Points:
    98
    Location:
    U.S.
    Ratings:
    +379
    Freedon ain't free. Someone had to maintain the freedom required to spout such spew and I submit that that someone is the very people that Joe Genius is writing this letter too. Go back to Cuba with your Che Guevara t-shirt.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. daveman
    Offline

    daveman Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2010
    Messages:
    51,299
    Thanks Received:
    5,693
    Trophy Points:
    1,775
    Location:
    On the way to the Dark Tower.
    Ratings:
    +5,759
    An Open Letter to Jacob G. Hornberger From the Troops:

    Fuck off, you asshat.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
  9. ogibillm
    Offline

    ogibillm Gold Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2011
    Messages:
    14,029
    Thanks Received:
    1,617
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +4,570
    here's the thing - as of right now there is no affront to our freedom. our military actions abroad are protecting american interests but they are not protecting our freedoms.

    now one could argue that by their existence our military is passively protecting our freedoms. i certainly wouldn't disagree.

    all that being said i think it's in poor taste to complain to people that have volunteered to serve their country about the policies and decisions that dictate the form that service takes.

    and if believing that they are fighting for our freedoms instead of our interests gives the servicemen or their families comfort it's an illusion i'll gladly support.
     
  10. bluemoon22
    Offline

    bluemoon22 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2010
    Messages:
    36
    Thanks Received:
    7
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +7
    Wow, thanks for sharing. I agree wholeheartedly. There are no "freedoms" to be saved overseas. By going over there we have enraged people that already hated us and denied the so called freedom we are fighting for to millions of people.
     

Share This Page