America’s Most Advanced Climate Station Data Shows US In A 10-Year Cooling Trend Read more: http:

[Old Rocks]

But that will not change the yappings of lesser intellects one little bit. Reality means nothing to them.

 

[jc456]

But that will not change the yappings of lesser intellects one little bit. Reality means nothing to them.

Again. We speak the truth and you can't handle the truth.

 

[Old Rocks]

Mr. jc454, the truth is not in you. The scientists from around the world have spoken with a unanimous voice, and they have said we are warming, too rapidly, and that will create a precarious future not only for many humans but also for the other species on this planet.

 

[hortysir]

Mr. jc454, the truth is not in you. The scientists from around the world have spoken with a unanimous voice, and they have said we are warming, too rapidly, and that will create a precarious future not only for many humans but also for the other species on this planet.

And the best scientists, in the 70s, said we were on the brink of the next ice age.

You give humans' way too much credit to think our little measly existence, in the grand scheme of things, really matters.
This blue marble has been heating and cooling for eons before Eve said, "Here. Try this"

 

[Old Rocks]

Mr. Hortysir, that lie has been disproven so many times here that to repeat it is simply ludicrous.

 

[hortysir]

Mr. Hortysir, that lie has been disproven so many times here that to repeat it is simply ludicrous.

Proven?
With repeatable experiments and conclusions that increasing CO2 levels can cause a rise in temperature?

Doubling CO2 and basic physics Clive Best

 

[BullKurtz]

Mr. jc454, the truth is not in you. The scientists from around the world have spoken with a unanimous voice, and they have said we are warming, too rapidly, and that will create a precarious future not only for many humans but also for the other species on this planet.

"unanimous"? The only "scientists" (most of whom have no background in climate study) who still preach this hooey are being PAID through grants to give the answers the funding agencies want. Even NASA got into the act and later admitted they presented false data.

 

[Old Rocks]

Really? You actually think that? So why don't you link us to a Scientific Society that states that AGW is not occurring. How about a National Academy of Science? Or a major University? You cannot because there are none. You are simply flapping your yap, with nothing but a vacuum between your ears to back you up.

 

[RollingThunder]

Mr. jc454, the truth is not in you. The scientists from around the world have spoken with a unanimous voice, and they have said we are warming, too rapidly, and that will create a precarious future not only for many humans but also for the other species on this planet.

And the best scientists, in the 70s, said we were on the brink of the next ice age.

Nope! They weren't. You're parroting a thoroughly debunked denier cult myth and propaganda meme that has no real basis in reality. The large majority of scientists studying the climate in the 1970's were far more concerned about global warming. This is revealed in the scientific literature of that era.

The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Vol. 89: Issue. 9: Pages. 1325-1337
(Volume publication date: September 2008)
DOI: 10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1
Thomas C. Peterson , William M. Connolley and John Fleck

Abstract
Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

View PDF (4234 KB)
AMS Journals © 2015

 

[jc456]

Mr. jc454, the truth is not in you. The scientists from around the world have spoken with a unanimous voice, and they have said we are warming, too rapidly, and that will create a precarious future not only for many humans but also for the other species on this planet.

Show me evidence then.

 

[Old Rocks]

Here you go, Mr. jc456;

Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Evidence

 

[jc456]

Really? You actually think that? So why don't you link us to a Scientific Society that states that AGW is not occurring. How about a National Academy of Science? Or a major University? You cannot because there are none. You are simply flapping your yap, with nothing but a vacuum between your ears to back you up.

Ipcc, read AR5

 

[hortysir]

Mr. jc454, the truth is not in you. The scientists from around the world have spoken with a unanimous voice, and they have said we are warming, too rapidly, and that will create a precarious future not only for many humans but also for the other species on this planet.

And the best scientists, in the 70s, said we were on the brink of the next ice age.

Nope! They weren't. You're parroting a thoroughly debunked denier cult myth and propaganda meme that has no real basis in reality. The large majority of scientists studying the climate in the 1970's were far more concerned about global warming. This is revealed in the scientific literature of that era.

The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Vol. 89: Issue. 9: Pages. 1325-1337
(Volume publication date: September 2008)
DOI: 10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1
Thomas C. Peterson , William M. Connolley and John Fleck

Abstract
Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

View PDF (4234 KB)
AMS Journals © 2015

YouTube

 

[RollingThunder]

Mr. jc454, the truth is not in you. The scientists from around the world have spoken with a unanimous voice, and they have said we are warming, too rapidly, and that will create a precarious future not only for many humans but also for the other species on this planet.

And the best scientists, in the 70s, said we were on the brink of the next ice age.

Nope! They weren't. You're parroting a thoroughly debunked denier cult myth and propaganda meme that has no real basis in reality. The large majority of scientists studying the climate in the 1970's were far more concerned about global warming. This is revealed in the scientific literature of that era.

The Myth of the 1970s Global Cooling Scientific Consensus
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
Vol. 89: Issue. 9: Pages. 1325-1337
(Volume publication date: September 2008)
DOI: 10.1175/2008BAMS2370.1
Thomas C. Peterson , William M. Connolley and John Fleck

Abstract
Climate science as we know it today did not exist in the 1960s and 1970s. The integrated enterprise embodied in the Nobel Prizewinning work of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change existed then as separate threads of research pursued by isolated groups of scientists. Atmospheric chemists and modelers grappled with the measurement of changes in carbon dioxide and atmospheric gases, and the changes in climate that might result. Meanwhile, geologists and paleoclimate researchers tried to understand when Earth slipped into and out of ice ages, and why. An enduring popular myth suggests that in the 1970s the climate science community was predicting “global cooling” and an “imminent” ice age, an observation frequently used by those who would undermine what climate scientists say today about the prospect of global warming. A review of the literature suggests that, on the contrary, greenhouse warming even then dominated scientists' thinking as being one of the most important forces shaping Earth's climate on human time scales. More importantly than showing the falsehood of the myth, this review describes how scientists of the time built the foundation on which the cohesive enterprise of modern climate science now rests.

View PDF (4234 KB)
AMS Journals © 2015

YouTube

LOLOLOLOLOL......poor deluded and very confused denier cultists....

It is shown to you that most scientists publishing papers about the climate in the 70's were already predicting global warming....and you respond with a video of a newscaster? LOL.

 

[jc456]

Here you go, Mr. jc456;

Climate Change Vital Signs of the Planet Evidence

That entire link is so full of crap it isn't funny. Tell you what, you cut and paste one thing out of that that doesn't say "very likely " or reconstruction and is evidence.

 

[BullKurtz]

Really? You actually think that? So why don't you link us to a Scientific Society that states that AGW is not occurring. How about a National Academy of Science? Or a major University? You cannot because there are none. You are simply flapping your yap, with nothing but a vacuum between your ears to back you up.

All bought and paid for and swallowed whole by leftist moron atheists like you so can believe in something....anything. You want coal and oil shut down so you can ride your bicycle and read by solar collectors for an hour or two a night.

 

[BullKurtz]

LOLOLOLOLOL......poor deluded and very confused denier cultists....

It is shown to you that most scientists publishing papers about the climate in the 70's were already predicting global warming....and you respond with a video of a newscaster? LOL.

So where's the Katrina force hurricanes, submerged coastlines, and sunken islands that Fat Albert said would have us by now, asshole?

 

[jc456]

Really? You actually think that? So why don't you link us to a Scientific Society that states that AGW is not occurring. How about a National Academy of Science? Or a major University? You cannot because there are none. You are simply flapping your yap, with nothing but a vacuum between your ears to back you up.

All bought and paid for and swallowed whole by leftist moron atheists like you so can believe in something....anything. You want coal and oil shut down so you can ride your bicycle and read by solar collectors for an hour or two a night.

He can ride his bike with coal still burning!

 

[BullKurtz]

He can ride his bike with coal still burning!

Not without coughing.

 

[jc456]

He can ride his bike with coal still burning!

Not without coughing.

Bodda-bing