Americans Viewing Other Americans As The Enemy.

Procrustes Stretched

And you say, "Oh my God, am I here all alone?"
Dec 1, 2008
60,094
7,375
1,840
Positively 4th Street
Why is this in the Religion and Ethics Forum and not the Political Forum? Because the sub heading of the forum title is Religion, Philosophy and the discussion of right and wrong.

Being a Liberal and an American Liberal, it pains me to see other Americans view each other as enemies and not merely as neighbors and fellow Americans they disagree with on some things, or simply as ideological opponents. What are the causes of such dis-ease in America? Did it always exist because of the melting pot nature of America?

I know some of the most heated anti Socialist and anti Marxist nonsense on the right came over from eastern Europe and Asia. Many of the immigrants from those areas lived under repressive systems of government and they emigrated and barely escaped with life and limb in many cases from their homelands, so they come with the reactionary mindset of a wingnut extraordinaire.

The same can be said for the more virile form of anti Capitalist moonbat-ism on the left. The systems of government some of the immigrants who started American Socialist and Marxist groups lived under were horrific in nature. Right wing Authoritarianism and Fascism kept many people in the shadows of their own countries. These people came here and wanted things for the people...the collective goodwill as opposed to the goodwill of the ruling elites.

Fine. But they hated their fellow countrymen and countrywomen with good reason. What is not fine is they have come here and hijacked the goodwill of the American spirit.

that is part of my two cents on this subject. there is more, but I'll save it for later.

What I see happening in American political and cultural life today is unethical and immoral; demonizing of neighbors for having or expressing different ideas on how we all want our nation run. Respect and civility do not bring what one would expect from the haters---anger and hostility, no...they bring contempt and silence. People who deal with others with respect and civility get ignored and brushed aside as clueless, pollyannaish, naive and more.

Was America always this way? Is this what happens in politics---the art of compromise's children are to be wingnut and moonbat? Something is not right. Maybe it was always this way and we live in a world populated with myth and fairy tale.

can people disagree and not always be so disagreeable? is it possible to be disagreeable sometimes when the stakes are very high but agreeable or just plain upset over differences when the stakes are anything less than very high?

:eusa_eh:
 
Last edited:
Why is this in the Religion and Ethics Forum and not the Political Forum? Because the sub heading of the forum title is Religion, Philosophy and the discussion of right and wrong.

Being a Liberal and an American Liberal, it pains me to see other Americans view each other as enemies and not merely as neighbors and fellow Americans they disagree with on some things, or simply as ideological opponents. What are the causes of such dis-ease in America? Did it always exist because of the melting pot nature of America?

I know some of the most heated anti Socialist and anti Marxist nonsense on the right came over from eastern Europe and Asia. Many of the immigrants from those areas lived under repressive systems of government and they emigrated and barely escaped with life and limb in many cases from their homelands, so they come with the reactionary mindset of a wingnut extraordinaire.

The same can be said for the more virile form of anti Capitalist moonbat-ism on the left. The systems of government some of the immigrants who started American Socialist and Marxist groups lived under were horrific in nature. Right wing Authoritarianism and Fascism kept many people in the shadows of their own countries. These people came here and wanted things for the people...the collective goodwill as opposed to the goodwill of the ruling elites.

Fine. But they hated their fellow countrymen and countrywomen with good reason. What is not fine is they have come here and hijacked the goodwill of the American spirit.

that is part of my two cents on this subject. there is more, but I'll save it for later.

What I see happening in American political and cultural life today is unethical and immoral; demonizing of neighbors for having or expressing different ideas on how we all want our nation run. Respect and civility do not bring what one would expect from the haters---anger and hostility, no...they bring contempt and silence. People who deal with others with respect and civility get ignored and brushed aside as clueless, pollyannaish, naive and more.

Was America always this way? Is this what happens in politics---the art of compromise's children are to be wingnut and moonbat? Something is not right. Maybe it was always this way and we live in a world populated with myth and fairy tale.

can people disagree and not always be so disagreeable? is it possible to be disagreeable sometimes when the stakes are very high but agreeable or just plain upset over differences when the stakes are anything less than very high?

:eusa_eh:

Intolerance as a result of being completely closed-minded to difference.

We've always been this way. Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton is a duel over a political pissing contest. Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams had a feud while running against each other Jerry Springer would have been proud of.

You can't really divorce the politcs from the religion, or even the lack thereof because each wants laws that mirror their personal beliefs.
 
You're going to get people heated when you have one faction who insists that the nation treat enemies like friends and friends like enemies.
 
You're going to get people heated when you have one faction who insists that the nation treat enemies like friends and friends like enemies.

factions? within parties, groups, the nation? why do the others not make one faction STFU? aren't factions the minority? or are you making a case for differences to be the root of factional infighting?

the GOP and the DNC have few factions today and had lots of them way back when they got along better.

I never heard people say we should "treat enemies like friends and friends like enemies." where do you hear this? where did you grow up? where are your family roots outside of America?
 
$LiberalsMotivator.jpg
 
Seriously, I can't imagine why some Americans might see other Americans as enemies when those others advocate constant intereference and control of our lives by the federal government. What possibly reason would we have to be upset with people trying to tell us what to do?
 
Or with those who tell us we are fascists, that we are not allowed to address their lack of patriotism, or otherwise describe them in anything other than terminology they choose for us to use?

Can't imagine why we'd consider those people our enemies.
 
Why is this in the Religion and Ethics Forum and not the Political Forum? Because the sub heading of the forum title is Religion, Philosophy and the discussion of right and wrong.

---

:eusa_eh:

Intolerance as a result of being completely closed-minded to difference.

We've always been this way. Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton is a duel over a political pissing contest. Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams had a feud while running against each other Jerry Springer would have been proud of.

You can't really divorce the politcs from the religion, or even the lack thereof because each wants laws that mirror their personal beliefs.

I had to laugh because you know in part where I am really coming from. I used to have a book of political cartoons from the colonial era up to the late-mid 20th century in America. The earliest were the most humorous to me. Pamphleteers would show Prime Minister Pitt farting diarrhea all over a drawing of the 13 colonies. This kind of stuff was put up in the public square. Lincoln as an ape? And the founding fathers were brutal in political battle when it came to fighting too win the spoils of a political campaign for high office.

We have come back to the days of the pamphleteers with the internet. I am of two minds on this.

Everyone has a separate voice. Swede! Or is it? Is that really true or truly desirable? Where is the faction building? Where is the cohesion of groups representing people? Will a few people be more able to rule over us because we are all running around tooting our own little blowhard horns while... Rome/America burns?

The illusion that the digital age is 'better' for the little man is what makes me laugh. We have gone backwards. Maybe I am looking at the short term costs/benefits and can't see the long term ones?


I am interested in Aaron Burr and Benedict Arnold, both all-American heroes at one point in their lives. The myths we choose to live with, knowingly or not, determine our fate.
 
Last edited:
you probably should read what you are going to reply to before you hit 'submit reply'.

Seriously, I can't imagine why some Americans might see other Americans as enemies when those others advocate constant intereference and control of our lives by the federal government. What possibly reason would we have to be upset with people trying to tell us what to do?

I clearly made the distinction between enemy and being upset as two very different birds of a feather. :doubt:
 
Or with those who tell us we are fascists, that we are not allowed to address their lack of patriotism, or otherwise describe them in anything other than terminology they choose for us to use?

Can't imagine why we'd consider those people our enemies.

why would anyone call you a fascist and why are you using the 'WE' tactic here? can you not stand on your own two paws when defending your views? must you always imagine you are speaking for a group?
 
Last edited:
The thing I find ironic is that some who defend Rush and Ann as humorists, castigate Al Franken's words and action spoken and done as part of real comedy routines.

earlier in another thread people were defending Rush as if he were billed as a comic, and that only those on the left had missed this factoid. false as it is.



Let's not forget this dandy...

treason.jpg


BTW, does anyone else notice the irony of an Anne Coulter book proudly displaying a positive New York Times reference on the front cover.
 
you probably should read what you are going to reply to before you hit 'submit reply'.

Seriously, I can't imagine why some Americans might see other Americans as enemies when those others advocate constant intereference and control of our lives by the federal government. What possibly reason would we have to be upset with people trying to tell us what to do?

I clearly made the distinction between enemy and being upset as two very different birds of a feather. :doubt:

Looks fine to me. Having trouble understanding it? I can make it simple:

People dont like being told what to do by idiots who think that they are smarter than everyone else.
 
you probably should read what you are going to reply to before you hit 'submit reply'.

Seriously, I can't imagine why some Americans might see other Americans as enemies when those others advocate constant intereference and control of our lives by the federal government. What possibly reason would we have to be upset with people trying to tell us what to do?

I clearly made the distinction between enemy and being upset as two very different birds of a feather. :doubt:

Looks fine to me. Having trouble understanding it? I can make it simple:

People dont like being told what to do by idiots who think that they are smarter than everyone else.
Didn't I see you in the abortion thread being such an idiot?
 
Why is this in the Religion and Ethics Forum and not the Political Forum? Because the sub heading of the forum title is Religion, Philosophy and the discussion of right and wrong.

---

:eusa_eh:

Intolerance as a result of being completely closed-minded to difference.

We've always been this way. Aaron Burr killed Alexander Hamilton is a duel over a political pissing contest. Andrew Jackson and John Quincy Adams had a feud while running against each other Jerry Springer would have been proud of.

You can't really divorce the politcs from the religion, or even the lack thereof because each wants laws that mirror their personal beliefs.

I had to laugh because you know in part where I am really coming from. I used to have a book of political cartoons from the colonial era up to the late-mid 20th century in America. The earliest were the most humorous to me. Pamphleteers would show Prime Minister Pitt farting diarrhea all over a drawing of the 13 colonies. This kind of stuff was put up in the public square. Lincoln as an ape? And the founding fathers were brutal in political battle when it came to fighting too win the spoils of a political campaign for high office.

We have come back to the days of the pamphleteers with the internet. I am of two minds on this.

Everyone has a separate voice. Swede! Or is it? Is that really true or truly desirable? Where is the faction building? Where is the cohesion of groups representing people? Will a few people be more able to rule over us because we are all running around tooting our own little blowhard horns while... Rome/America burns?

The illusion that the digital age is 'better' for the little man is what makes me laugh. We have gone backwards. Maybe I am looking at the short term costs/benefits and can't see the long term ones?


I am interested in Aaron Burr and Benedict Arnold, both all-American heroes at one point in their lives. The myths we choose to live with, knowingly or not, determine our fate.

I am a firm believer that the Internet has ruined political discourse. The anonymity makes it a breeding ground for hate and people who otherwise wouldn't, get caught up in it. I bet it takes more courage (or stupidity) than many posters have to say the stuff they say daily online to a real person whom they disagree withs face.
 

Forum List

Back
Top