Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
There is no rational basis in fact or logic for calling it their land. Land ownership and political control of land is determined by law and treaty and area C is under Israeli control by treaty with the Palestinians, the same treaty which gave the Palestinians civil and security control of area and civil control of area B.Why do Palestinians need to get building permits from foreign assholes to build on their own land?Stop building without permits......
Meantime, Bensouda has announced she in interested (finally) in investigating war crimes by Palestinians.Dutch NGO appeals to ‘passive’ ICC: open investigation into Israeli war crimes
A Dutch NGO has released an urgent appeal for the International Criminal Court (ICC) to take action on Israeli violations of Palestinian human rights, in protest of what the group called the court’s
“passive” approach.
The Rights Forum, an organization “committed to a fair and sustainable Dutch and European policy on the Palestine/Israel issue,” announced earlier this week that it was delivering its
appeal with the support of 185 organizations from 25 countries.
“Without further delay, investigate possible war crimes committed in Israeli-occupied Palestinian territory,” the group said in their appeal, which they delivered to Chief ICC prosecutor Fatou Bensouda at The Hague on Tuesday.
Dutch NGO appeals to ‘passive’ ICC: open investigation into Israeli war crimes – Mondoweiss
There is no rational basis in fact or logic for calling it their land. Land ownership and political control of land is determined by law and treaty and area C is under Israeli control by treaty with the Palestinians, the same treaty which gave the Palestinians civil and security control of area and civil control of area B.Why do Palestinians need to get building permits from foreign assholes to build on their own land?Stop building without permits......
A treaty can only be concluded between two states.area C is under Israeli control by treaty with the Palestinians,
The Oslo treaty was signed by Arafat and endorsed by the vast majority of Palestinians and lauded by the "international community. Progress to fully implement the treaty was stalled by the second intifada and by the continuing refusal of the PA to negotiate with Israel. Oslo is either in effect or void. If void, there is no legal basis for the PA to have any authority over any part of Judea or Samaria, and Israel is without any obligation to any Palestinian political entity.There is no rational basis in fact or logic for calling it their land. Land ownership and political control of land is determined by law and treaty and area C is under Israeli control by treaty with the Palestinians, the same treaty which gave the Palestinians civil and security control of area and civil control of area B.Why do Palestinians need to get building permits from foreign assholes to build on their own land?Stop building without permits......A treaty can only be concluded between two states.area C is under Israeli control by treaty with the Palestinians,
Why it matters on what theory of recognition my point is based they do not make clear. My point was not in any event based on any particular theory of recognition. Instead, it was simply that Israel's demand reflected an assumption on Israel's part that Palestine was a state.The fact that Israel was making such an assumption was obvious to Benjamin Netanyahu, who, as an opposition politician in 1993, objected to Rabin's agreement with Arafat (Declaration of Principles). From the floor of the Knesset, Netanyahu objected that the mutual recognition that was part and parcel of the Rabin-Arafat agreement amounted to recognition by Israel of the Palestine state.
Netanyahu was correct. Israel had just acknowledged in writing that it considered Palestine to be a state.
http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=mjil
That said, no treaty can negotiate away the rights of the people. Treaties are void if they do not conform to international law.
That said, no treaty can negotiate away the rights of the people. Treaties are void if they do not conform to international law.
There is no rational basis in fact or logic for calling it their land. Land ownership and political control of land is determined by law and treaty and area C is under Israeli control by treaty with the Palestinians, the same treaty which gave the Palestinians civil and security control of area and civil control of area B.Why do Palestinians need to get building permits from foreign assholes to build on their own land?Stop building without permits......A treaty can only be concluded between two states.area C is under Israeli control by treaty with the Palestinians,
Why it matters on what theory of recognition my point is based they do not make clear. My point was not in any event based on any particular theory of recognition. Instead, it was simply that Israel's demand reflected an assumption on Israel's part that Palestine was a state.The fact that Israel was making such an assumption was obvious to Benjamin Netanyahu, who, as an opposition politician in 1993, objected to Rabin's agreement with Arafat (Declaration of Principles). From the floor of the Knesset, Netanyahu objected that the mutual recognition that was part and parcel of the Rabin-Arafat agreement amounted to recognition by Israel of the Palestine state.
Netanyahu was correct. Israel had just acknowledged in writing that it considered Palestine to be a state.
http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=mjil
That said, no treaty can negotiate away the rights of the people. Treaties are void if they do not conform to international law.
Israel thinks it can do anything it wants weather it is mentioned in Oslo or not. Oslo cannot permit anything that is otherwise illegal.That said, no treaty can negotiate away the rights of the people. Treaties are void if they do not conform to international law.
There is nothing about Oslo which does not conform to normative international law. Nor is there anything in Oslo which violates the rights of a people.
If you think there is, name it.
Israel thinks it can do anything it wants weather it is mentioned in Oslo or not. Oslo cannot permit anything that is otherwise illegal.That said, no treaty can negotiate away the rights of the people. Treaties are void if they do not conform to international law.
There is nothing about Oslo which does not conform to normative international law. Nor is there anything in Oslo which violates the rights of a people.
If you think there is, name it.
The wall is illegal. The settlements are illegal. Destroying property is illegal. Destroying food and water sources are illegal. And the list goes on. Israel claims "state land" when the West Bank is not part of their state.
Israeli settlers attack Palestinian cars with stones in West Bank
BETHLEHEM, (PIC)
Hordes of Israeli settlers on Saturday evening attacked Palestinian cars with stones near al-Jab'a village, southwest of Bethlehem.
Head of al-Jab'a's village council Diab Masha'la said that Israeli settlers attacked Palestinian vehicles with stones and rocks causing partial damages to many of them.
About 800,000 Israeli settlers live in 503 illegal outposts in the West Bank and Jerusalem, which cover over 46% of their area, and they carry out attacks on almost a daily basis against the Palestinians.
Read more at
Israeli settlers attack Palestinian cars with stones in West Bank
@Copyright The Palestinian Information Center
Palestine doesn’t exist. So your post is void.There is no rational basis in fact or logic for calling it their land. Land ownership and political control of land is determined by law and treaty and area C is under Israeli control by treaty with the Palestinians, the same treaty which gave the Palestinians civil and security control of area and civil control of area B.Why do Palestinians need to get building permits from foreign assholes to build on their own land?Stop building without permits......A treaty can only be concluded between two states.area C is under Israeli control by treaty with the Palestinians,
Why it matters on what theory of recognition my point is based they do not make clear. My point was not in any event based on any particular theory of recognition. Instead, it was simply that Israel's demand reflected an assumption on Israel's part that Palestine was a state.The fact that Israel was making such an assumption was obvious to Benjamin Netanyahu, who, as an opposition politician in 1993, objected to Rabin's agreement with Arafat (Declaration of Principles). From the floor of the Knesset, Netanyahu objected that the mutual recognition that was part and parcel of the Rabin-Arafat agreement amounted to recognition by Israel of the Palestine state.
Netanyahu was correct. Israel had just acknowledged in writing that it considered Palestine to be a state.
http://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1045&context=mjil
That said, no treaty can negotiate away the rights of the people. Treaties are void if they do not conform to international law.
In a First, Palestinians Challenge Israel’s Settlement Enterprise—in a US Court
Settlers established Ofra in 1975, and it is partially built on land confiscated from the Palestinian village of Ein Yabroud. According to the CCR’s claim, Ziad Alwan, who was born in Ein Yabroud in 1969 but now lives in Chicago, cannot rent the Ofra property because he is Palestinian; he cannot set foot in it, even though his family is the rightful owner of the farmland that settlers and Airbnb are now profiting from. He holds the title deed for the land, which is listed under his father’s name and registered by the Israel Land Registry.
In a First, Palestinians Challenge Israel’s Settlement Enterprise—in a US Court
In a First, Palestinians Challenge Israel’s Settlement Enterprise—in a US Court
Settlers established Ofra in 1975, and it is partially built on land confiscated from the Palestinian village of Ein Yabroud. According to the CCR’s claim, Ziad Alwan, who was born in Ein Yabroud in 1969 but now lives in Chicago, cannot rent the Ofra property because he is Palestinian; he cannot set foot in it, even though his family is the rightful owner of the farmland that settlers and Airbnb are now profiting from. He holds the title deed for the land, which is listed under his father’s name and registered by the Israel Land Registry.
In a First, Palestinians Challenge Israel’s Settlement Enterprise—in a US Court
Pitty, I thought maybe this time they"ll finally bring up an Ottoman deed,
which they always threaten when filing a case in foreign courts but never provide, because they know it will create a precedent revealing all Jewish deeds as well - there's a reason for their hiding.
They can keep intimidating companies by making noise in the media, but what they don't reveal is that Israel doesn't issue land deeds, but rather lease deeds for up to 50 years, which can also be reversed.
What you don't understand is that by attempting to create a precedent, they also automatically give legal recognition of Israel as the sole authority in that land.
So the question remains, as with much of these cases - is intimidation of a company in the long run, strategically worth their recognition of the Israeli authority?
Israeli tourism has been reaching new records each year in the last decade,
Airbnb is a new company, that is not responsible for even 5% of it...so if this is the victory they're seeking, it's no wonder BDS-holes still don't realize how they literally boost Israeli economy with such coverage, and especially in Judea Samaria.
Israel steals the land from the Palestinians and leases it to the Jews.They can keep intimidating companies by making noise in the media, but what they don't reveal is that Israel doesn't issue land deeds, but rather lease deeds for up to 50 years which can be reversed.
In a First, Palestinians Challenge Israel’s Settlement Enterprise—in a US Court
Settlers established Ofra in 1975, and it is partially built on land confiscated from the Palestinian village of Ein Yabroud. According to the CCR’s claim, Ziad Alwan, who was born in Ein Yabroud in 1969 but now lives in Chicago, cannot rent the Ofra property because he is Palestinian; he cannot set foot in it, even though his family is the rightful owner of the farmland that settlers and Airbnb are now profiting from. He holds the title deed for the land, which is listed under his father’s name and registered by the Israel Land Registry.
In a First, Palestinians Challenge Israel’s Settlement Enterprise—in a US Court
Pitty, I thought maybe this time they"ll finally bring up an Ottoman deed,
which they always threaten when filing a case in foreign courts but never provide, because they know it will create a precedent revealing all Jewish deeds as well - there's a reason for their hiding.
They can keep intimidating companies by making noise in the media, but what they don't reveal is that Israel doesn't issue land deeds, but rather lease deeds for up to 50 years, which can also be reversed.
What you don't understand is that by attempting to create a precedent, they also automatically give legal recognition of Israel as the sole authority in that land.
So the question remains, as with much of these cases - is intimidation of a company in the long run, strategically worth their recognition of the Israeli authority?
Israeli tourism has been reaching new records each year in the last decade,
Airbnb is a new company, that is not responsible for even 5% of it...so if this is the victory they're seeking, it's no wonder BDS-holes still don't realize how they literally boost Israeli economy with such coverage, and especially in Judea Samaria.Israel steals the land from the Palestinians and leases it to the Jews.They can keep intimidating companies by making noise in the media, but what they don't reveal is that Israel doesn't issue land deeds, but rather lease deeds for up to 50 years which can be reversed.
Who is raking in the money from that scam?
(COMMENT)The pro-Israel lobby is on the decline; let’s help it on its way
Asa Winstanley
Dec 02,2019
Senior politicians in the Western countries have been jumping from the sinking ship of the Israeli lobby. Not enough, by any means, but it is a start.
The pro-Israel lobby is on the decline; let’s help it on its way - Palestine Post 24
In a First, Palestinians Challenge Israel’s Settlement Enterprise—in a US Court
Settlers established Ofra in 1975, and it is partially built on land confiscated from the Palestinian village of Ein Yabroud. According to the CCR’s claim, Ziad Alwan, who was born in Ein Yabroud in 1969 but now lives in Chicago, cannot rent the Ofra property because he is Palestinian; he cannot set foot in it, even though his family is the rightful owner of the farmland that settlers and Airbnb are now profiting from. He holds the title deed for the land, which is listed under his father’s name and registered by the Israel Land Registry.
In a First, Palestinians Challenge Israel’s Settlement Enterprise—in a US Court
Pitty, I thought maybe this time they"ll finally bring up an Ottoman deed,
which they always threaten when filing a case in foreign courts but never provide, because they know it will create a precedent revealing all Jewish deeds as well - there's a reason for their hiding.
They can keep intimidating companies by making noise in the media, but what they don't reveal is that Israel doesn't issue land deeds, but rather lease deeds for up to 50 years, which can also be reversed.
What you don't understand is that by attempting to create a precedent, they also automatically give legal recognition of Israel as the sole authority in that land.
So the question remains, as with much of these cases - is intimidation of a company in the long run, strategically worth their recognition of the Israeli authority?
Israeli tourism has been reaching new records each year in the last decade,
Airbnb is a new company, that is not responsible for even 5% of it...so if this is the victory they're seeking, it's no wonder BDS-holes still don't realize how they literally boost Israeli economy with such coverage, and especially in Judea Samaria.Israel steals the land from the Palestinians and leases it to the Jews.They can keep intimidating companies by making noise in the media, but what they don't reveal is that Israel doesn't issue land deeds, but rather lease deeds for up to 50 years which can be reversed.
Who is raking in the money from that scam?
