All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[Toddsterpatriot]

Israeli occupation authority? What's that?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Hollie]

Why should Pally squatters be allowed to illegally build on land they don’t own?

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[rylah]

 

[rylah]

Make my day, they should all go to hunger strike,
only without Tortit waffles in toilets this time...

 

[rylah]

Another BDS-hole victory goes to...

who is he?

EU to condition UNRWA funds on removing incitement from PA textbooks

Budget panel approves amendment to strip Ramallah of 20 million Euros if immediate changes are not made to the curriculum to promote coexistence with Israel; funding would instead be sent to groups that don't vilify Israel

www.ynetnews.com

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

How many Palestinians were murdered by Hamas rockets?

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Very Poor Logic and the application of a fallacy (ad Hominem).
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is both the case of:

◈ Selective Enforcement.​

​

◈ The unfounded accusations.​

(COMMENT)

Generally speaking (but not always true) many pro-Arab Palestinians who engage in anti-Israeli rhetoric, are appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect (Abusive Ad Hominem) and are an attack directed at an opponent's character, to discredit the pro-Israeli position rather than by an answer to the allegations. Very often the pro-Arab Palestinians depend on the inability of the pro-Arab Palestinian to "fact check" the meaning of the allegation and understand the means by which the anti-Israeli sources deliberately mislead the reader and thereby camouflage the truth. This is a very common practice in order to defend the twin pro-Arab Palestinians assertions that there is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad, and that Armed Struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine. It is generally used to justify violation by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) accusations of genocide, apartheid, and the open incitement to violence. The anti-Israeli contingent generally conveniently forget to point out that international laws and covenants are constructed the way they are so that the International Courts can employ the legal principle of:

Nullum crimen sine lege​

The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted.​

​

Many of the Vehement HoAP, and those that support HoAP organizations and activities, very often show signs as having a reading comprehension disability. They can read the words, but when put into a sentence are hard pressed to discern the meaning or implication.

When the HoAP activities, pro-Arab Palestinians contingents, and the anti-Israel advocates chooses, at their discretion, to recommend enforcement of Customary and International Humanitarian Laws or Covenants against Israel but exempt themselves and not advocate or recommend that same enforcement of the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws or Covenants against the HoAP; that becomes a case of selective enforcement.

When the HoAP activities, pro-Arab Palestinians contingents, and the anti-Israel advocates make accusation of murder, genocide, apartheid, and the open incitement to violence, but exempt themselves, and not advocate or recommend that same enforcement; that becomes a case of selective enforcement.


Most Respectfully,
R

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Very Poor Logic and the application of a fallacy (ad Hominem).
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: This is both the case of:

◈ Selective Enforcement.​

​

◈ The unfounded accusations.​

(COMMENT)

Generally speaking (but not always true) many pro-Arab Palestinians who engage in anti-Israeli rhetoric, are appealing to feelings or prejudices rather than intellect (Abusive Ad Hominem) and are an attack directed at an opponent's character, to discredit the pro-Israeli position rather than by an answer to the allegations. Very often the pro-Arab Palestinians depend on the inability of the pro-Arab Palestinian to "fact check" the meaning of the allegation and understand the means by which the anti-Israeli sources deliberately mislead the reader and thereby camouflage the truth. This is a very common practice in order to defend the twin pro-Arab Palestinians assertions that there is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad, and that Armed Struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine. It is generally used to justify violation by the Hostile Arab Palestinians (HoAP) accusations of genocide, apartheid, and the open incitement to violence. The anti-Israeli contingent generally conveniently forget to point out that international laws and covenants are constructed the way they are so that the International Courts can employ the legal principle of:

Nullum crimen sine lege​

The definition of a crime shall be strictly construed and shall not be extended by analogy. In case of ambiguity, the definition shall be interpreted in favour of the person being investigated, prosecuted or convicted.​

View attachment 554884​

Many of the Vehement HoAP, and those that support HoAP organizations and activities, very often show signs as having a reading comprehension disability. They can read the words, but when put into a sentence are hard pressed to discern the meaning or implication.

When the HoAP activities, pro-Arab Palestinians contingents, and the anti-Israel advocates chooses, at their discretion, to recommend enforcement of Customary and International Humanitarian Laws or Covenants against Israel but exempt themselves and not advocate or recommend that same enforcement of the Customary and International Humanitarian Laws or Covenants against the HoAP; that becomes a case of selective enforcement.

When the HoAP activities, pro-Arab Palestinians contingents, and the anti-Israel advocates make accusation of murder, genocide, apartheid, and the open incitement to violence, but exempt themselves, and not advocate or recommend that same enforcement; that becomes a case of selective enforcement.


Most Respectfully,
R

(Abusive Ad Hominem) and are an attack directed at an opponent's character,

Like terrorist or anti Semite?

 

[P F Tinmore]

This is a very common practice in order to defend the twin pro-Arab Palestinians assertions that there is no solution for the Palestinian question except through Jihad, and that Armed Struggle is the only way to liberate Palestine.

That is old hat.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Everyone is a terrorist to those fuckers. It is part of their terrorist propaganda campaign.

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israeli name calling fail.

 

[RoccoR]

RE: All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss
SUBTOPIC: Very Poor Logic and the application of a fallacy (ad Hominem).
⁜→ P F Tinmore, et al,

BLUF: Identifying a person (or persons) as a "Terrorist" has been in the international political and judicial vocabulary since 1938. The use of such a term is just as valid as identifying someone as a "Palestinian."

​

Such things help to define a word that modifies a noun.

◈ Hostile Arab Palestinian​

​

◈ Terrorist Arab Palestinian​

​

◈ Hostile Arab Palestinian Terrorist.​

THE WORKING DEFINITION OF ANTI-SEMITISM

What Does It Mean,​

Why Is It Important, and​

What Should We Do With It?​

Like terrorist or anti Semite?

That is old hat.

Everyone is a terrorist to those fuckers. It is part of their terrorist propaganda campaign.

(COMMENT)

Most educated people define the terms or outline why a term is not applicable. To play "Osterich" and stick your head in the sand in order to disavow knowledge that that the European Union (representing 27 Countries) identifies the following organizations as terrorist groups or entities:
(See 9/1/2019 Official Journal of the European Union) (COUNCIL DECISION (CFSP) 2019/25)

◈ Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigade​

◈ Hamas’, including ‘Hamas-Izz al-Din al-Qassem​

◈ Hizbollah Military Wing​

◈ Palestinian Islamic Jihad​

◈ Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine​

◈ Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine — General Command​

Ben Ehrenreich
It is past time to retire the word ‘terrorism.

(COMMENT)

Should we just retire such words, simply because it offends the sensibilities of the perpetrator? (RHETORICAL) Well that is like saying that a neighborhood should not know has a resident "sex offender." That is like saying that you should not notify residents of a local center for helping former drug addicts, prisoners, psychiatric patients, or others has been established in their neighborhood.

More importantly, are the likes of communication and support these various Palestinian organizations have established. You have no doubt noticed that the Arab Republic of Egypt has simply closed its border crossing with the Gaza Strip. And this is a perfect case of "selective enforcement" on the allegation of "apartheid." Egypt completely closes it border crossing (not apartheid), but Israel is apartheid because: 80 percent of the goods entering the Gaza Strip pass through the Kerem Shalom Crossing. in terms of value, are purchased from Israeli companies and suppliers. The Kerem Shalom Crossing is economically vital for the Gazans to get their goods to market in the West Bank and Israel. The Israelis are now allowing some 10,000 Gazan Merchants and Sellers to pass into Israel through the Erez Border Crossing. The Rafah Border Crossing Point has recently reopened a portion of the crossing (one-way operations).


Most Respectfully,
R