All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[Sixties Fan]

Hamas endangers the Arab population by placing the entrance to these tunnels inside private Gaza homes, in an attempt to draw Israel into attacking those homes so that Hamas can publicize pictures of children harmed during strikes. The terrorists count on such pictures to stir up anti-Israel sentiment.

Hamas is therefore furious that Israel is responding to their terror strategy with an underground wall that will block the tunnels without the need to bomb any homes. This move by Israel denies Hamas the opportunity to place the lives of innocent children at risk in their twisted efforts to make Israel look bad.

(full article online)

WATCH: How Israel’s underground wall saves Jewish and Arab lives

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hamas endangers the Arab population by placing the entrance to these tunnels inside private Gaza homes, in an attempt to draw Israel into attacking those homes so that Hamas can publicize pictures of children harmed during strikes. The terrorists count on such pictures to stir up anti-Israel sentiment.

Hamas is therefore furious that Israel is responding to their terror strategy with an underground wall that will block the tunnels without the need to bomb any homes. This move by Israel denies Hamas the opportunity to place the lives of innocent children at risk in their twisted efforts to make Israel look bad.

(full article online)

WATCH: How Israel’s underground wall saves Jewish and Arab lives

Make those fuckers spend more money.

Doesn't Israel know that putting a cost onto the occupation is a Palestinian goal?

 

[Sixties Fan]

This year marks 100 years since the Balfour Declaration on November 2, 1917 which endorsed “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People.” The declaration became the basis for the League of Nations (precursor to the United Nations) to endorse the Palestine Mandate which clearly articulated the history and rights of Jews to a reconstituted national homeland in the area now commonly thought of as Gaza, Israel, the West Bank and Jordan.



Article 25 of the Mandate allowed the administrator (Britain) to change the contours of the reestablished Jewish homeland.
------
The League of Nations considered at the outset of its endorsement of a Jewish national home in 1920 and 1922 that perhaps the contours of such homeland should exclude the land east of the Jordan River. But international law has – and continues to fail – in two major respects:

• In JORDAN: The provision (Article 25) to cut the eastern part of the Mandate (and ONLY the eastern part) from the Jewish homeland specifically did not allow the discrimination against Jews from buying land or obtaining citizenship there;
• In the WEST BANK: All of the land west of the Jordan River was allocated for a Jewish homeland, and obviously with full legal authorization for Jews to purchase homes and obtain citizenship, despite calls by the current Palestinian Authority leadership to have a Jew-free country

(full article online)

The Original Nakba: The Division of “TransJordan”

What the British stated as the Mandatory's policy in June of 1922 was:

View attachment 144231

No link?

Oh....you don't want to be found out? OK.

I never get "found out" I present the facts. It is you people that have never bothered to do any research and only spout Hasbara propaganda that get found out.

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." HMG regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab Delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded in Palestine."

"Churchill White Paper" - UK Secretary of State for the Colonies (3 June 1922)

Is this paper for real? As posted by UNISPAL?

Lets see what it says:

"the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine."

What subordination of the Arabic population?
What different language than the usual Arabic the Arabs of Arabia have always spoken? What Palestine or Palestinian culture did they have which was different from the language, culture, etc from the Arabs in Egypt, North Africa, what became Syria, Lebanon or Iraq?

Why is it that the Arab League worries only about the endless numbers or Arab invaders, and does not care one iota for the rights of any and all the indigenous people of all the lands they invaded, conquered, and then were turned to them, the Arabs post WWI, and not to the other indigenous people like the Kurds, the Assyrians, the Yazidis and all other indigenous people who have managed to survive endless attacks by the Arab Muslims with the idea of keeping those lands in Arab Muslim hands?

There were 4 Mandates. 3 were given to the Arabs, and not to the legitimate indigenous people of those lands.

The fourth one, Palestine Mandate, was split unequally.
77% to the just kicked out of Arabia, Hashemite clan, instead of TranJordan being given, as promised and as or right, to the Jewish People the Mandate was created for.

The Arabs have continued to subordinate the Kurds, Assyrians, Yazidis and all others to their Conquerors' rules.

You know very well that there was not going to be ANY subjugation of the Arab, Druze, Bahai, and other groups living in the Mandate for Palestine by the Jewish indigenous people.

Any more than there is now in the State of Israel.

You want Arabs to be "subordinate" to the Jews?
Go and tell them to be so and stop fighting and just give in.
Hamas and Abbas and all others can just give in to the Jews and live under "Jewish Domination" just as 20 % of Arabs who now live in Israel are doing. And most of those 20% are enjoying the Israeli/Jewish treatment very much. Thank you !!!
So much so that they do not want to be part of any "Palestine State".

Just go ask them yourself. They have told on video how much they do not mind that Israel is a Jewish State, as it should be, as it has always been the ancestral land of the Jews, and not of the Arabs.

 

[louie888]

What the British stated as the Mandatory's policy in June of 1922 was:

View attachment 144231

Whoa! Now, that's awkward.

 

[montelatici]

This year marks 100 years since the Balfour Declaration on November 2, 1917 which endorsed “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People.” The declaration became the basis for the League of Nations (precursor to the United Nations) to endorse the Palestine Mandate which clearly articulated the history and rights of Jews to a reconstituted national homeland in the area now commonly thought of as Gaza, Israel, the West Bank and Jordan.



Article 25 of the Mandate allowed the administrator (Britain) to change the contours of the reestablished Jewish homeland.
------
The League of Nations considered at the outset of its endorsement of a Jewish national home in 1920 and 1922 that perhaps the contours of such homeland should exclude the land east of the Jordan River. But international law has – and continues to fail – in two major respects:

• In JORDAN: The provision (Article 25) to cut the eastern part of the Mandate (and ONLY the eastern part) from the Jewish homeland specifically did not allow the discrimination against Jews from buying land or obtaining citizenship there;
• In the WEST BANK: All of the land west of the Jordan River was allocated for a Jewish homeland, and obviously with full legal authorization for Jews to purchase homes and obtain citizenship, despite calls by the current Palestinian Authority leadership to have a Jew-free country

(full article online)

The Original Nakba: The Division of “TransJordan”

What the British stated as the Mandatory's policy in June of 1922 was:

View attachment 144231

No link?

Oh....you don't want to be found out? OK.

I never get "found out" I present the facts. It is you people that have never bothered to do any research and only spout Hasbara propaganda that get found out.

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." HMG regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab Delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded in Palestine."

"Churchill White Paper" - UK Secretary of State for the Colonies (3 June 1922)

Is this paper for real? As posted by UNISPAL?

Lets see what it says:

"the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine."

What subordination of the Arabic population?
What different language than the usual Arabic the Arabs of Arabia have always spoken? What Palestine or Palestinian culture did they have which was different from the language, culture, etc from the Arabs in Egypt, North Africa, what became Syria, Lebanon or Iraq?

Why is it that the Arab League worries only about the endless numbers or Arab invaders, and does not care one iota for the rights of any and all the indigenous people of all the lands they invaded, conquered, and then were turned to them, the Arabs post WWI, and not to the other indigenous people like the Kurds, the Assyrians, the Yazidis and all other indigenous people who have managed to survive endless attacks by the Arab Muslims with the idea of keeping those lands in Arab Muslim hands?

There were 4 Mandates. 3 were given to the Arabs, and not to the legitimate indigenous people of those lands.

The fourth one, Palestine Mandate, was split unequally.
77% to the just kicked out of Arabia, Hashemite clan, instead of TranJordan being given, as promised and as or right, to the Jewish People the Mandate was created for.

The Arabs have continued to subordinate the Kurds, Assyrians, Yazidis and all others to their Conquerors' rules.

You know very well that there was not going to be ANY subjugation of the Arab, Druze, Bahai, and other groups living in the Mandate for Palestine by the Jewish indigenous people.

Any more than there is now in the State of Israel.

You want Arabs to be "subordinate" to the Jews?
Go and tell them to be so and stop fighting and just give in.
Hamas and Abbas and all others can just give in to the Jews and live under "Jewish Domination" just as 20 % of Arabs who now live in Israel are doing. And most of those 20% are enjoying the Israeli/Jewish treatment very much. Thank you !!!
So much so that they do not want to be part of any "Palestine State".

Just go ask them yourself. They have told on video how much they do not mind that Israel is a Jewish State, as it should be, as it has always been the ancestral land of the Jews, and not of the Arabs.

I see you have never had the benefit of studying the subject. Asking if the Mandatory's initial Policy Statement is "for real" is hilarious. It is the founding document of the Mandate and I linked you to the official archives of the UN that host the League of Nations historical document files. Man you are an idiot.

And, the Palestinians are not going to give and submit to Jew rule as you would like. Time is on their side and the Jews will lose in the long run.

 

[louie888]

Think, says the person who does not think at all.

Canada giving Texas to Mexico is logical to you?

 

[Shusha]

There are people of various ancestries that practice various religions. Adherence to a particular religion does not imply a particular ancestry. Religion does not imply ancestry.

What does imply ancestry? How would you be able to tell if someone had a particular ancestry? What criteria do you use for "ancestry"?

 

[Sixties Fan]

According to Suleiman, since it was supposedly Adam who built the Kaaba in Mecca, Muslim scholars conclude that it was therefore also Adam, or maybe his son Seth, who built the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. Later on, Suleiman claimed, Abraham and his son Isaac “raised the pillars” of the Kaaba in Mecca, and they “did the same” at Jerusalem’s Al-Aqsa, which had both been “constructed” and “made a sanctuary” by Adam. Suleiman then emphasized again that Abraham and his son built “two of the holiest masjids [mosques] in the world;” he also added: “We know Ibrahim [Abraham] settled in Palestine.”

While these are apparently mainstream Muslim teachings, they include truly bizarre claims for any non-Muslim listener. The obvious implication would be either that Adam — the Bible’s first human being — was a Muslim, and that Abraham and his son were also Muslims; or that “two of the holiest masjids [mosques] in the world” were actually built by non-Muslims. But why would anyone claim that there were mosques hundreds — or even many thousands — of years before there was Islam? And what prevents Jews or Christians from claiming that whatever places of worship Adam and Abraham are said to have built were actually synagogues or churches?

Quite obviously, the purpose of asserting that the mosque in Mecca and the Al-Aqsa Mosque go back to the time of Adam, and were then built up by Abraham and his son, is to claim these sites (and their builders) for Islam from the beginning of time, conveniently ignoring the fact that Islam arose only long after Judaism, and centuries after Christianity.

(full article online)

The Cultural Appropriation That Linda Sarsour Doesn’t Care About

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[montelatici]

There are people of various ancestries that practice various religions. Adherence to a particular religion does not imply a particular ancestry. Religion does not imply ancestry.

What does imply ancestry? How would you be able to tell if someone had a particular ancestry? What criteria do you use for "ancestry"?

If you have a question about ancestry, I suggest you take a primer on DNA.

 

[Shusha]

There are people of various ancestries that practice various religions. Adherence to a particular religion does not imply a particular ancestry. Religion does not imply ancestry.

What does imply ancestry? How would you be able to tell if someone had a particular ancestry? What criteria do you use for "ancestry"?

If you have a question about ancestry, I suggest you take a primer on DNA.

Are you proposing that everyone in the territory under dispute take a DNA test to determine if they are foreign invaders or indigenous peoples? That seems rather, well, unsavoury don't you think?

 

[montelatici]

There are people of various ancestries that practice various religions. Adherence to a particular religion does not imply a particular ancestry. Religion does not imply ancestry.

What does imply ancestry? How would you be able to tell if someone had a particular ancestry? What criteria do you use for "ancestry"?

If you have a question about ancestry, I suggest you take a primer on DNA.

Are you proposing that everyone in the territory under dispute take a DNA test to determine if they are foreign invaders or indigenous peoples? That seems rather, well, unsavoury don't you think?

It's clear who the invaders are. They there ancestors invaded from Europe and elsewhere just a short time ago. It's documented history. Their names are registered for the most part.

 

[Sixties Fan]

UAE to pay Gaza $15 million a month

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]

 

[Sixties Fan]

[The Arabs who are not "Palestinians" want another go at Israel ]

The “cease-fire” that isn’t.(Forest Rain) ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Hollie]

There are people of various ancestries that practice various religions. Adherence to a particular religion does not imply a particular ancestry. Religion does not imply ancestry.

What does imply ancestry? How would you be able to tell if someone had a particular ancestry? What criteria do you use for "ancestry"?

If you have a question about ancestry, I suggest you take a primer on DNA.

Are you proposing that everyone in the territory under dispute take a DNA test to determine if they are foreign invaders or indigenous peoples? That seems rather, well, unsavoury don't you think?

It's clear who the invaders are. They there ancestors invaded from Europe and elsewhere just a short time ago. It's documented history. Their names are registered for the most part.

It would take a more honest person than you to acknowledge the European Crusaders / colonists.

 

[Hollie]

The Hitler Youth summer camps run by the Hamas franchise of Islamic Terrorism Intl. Inc., are largely glossed over in much of the major media. However, these Hitler Youth wannabe fashion show graduations while a running joke, do provide confirmation that the Hamas conflict with the Jewish State remains deeply ideological. The Hamas propaganda mouthpiece that is Al-Aqsa TV has broadcast sermons reaffirming the Hamas ideology (consistent with Islamist ideology), is that it is Muhammedan destiny to exterminate the Jews.

Investing in the Death Cult.


Hamas holds war-ready summer camp graduation

Hamas holds war-ready summer camp graduation | Daily Mail Online

Young Palestinians take part in a military graduation ceremony at a Hamas summer camp in Khan Yunis, in the southern Gaza Strip, on August 18, 2017

Hamas held a closing ceremony in the Gaza Strip on Friday for a batch of the 120,000 boys and girls attending the Islamist movement's controversial summer schools.

The ceremony, for some 1,000 students who took part in camps in the southern city of Khan Yunis, was framed as part of the militant group's plan to continue its armed conflict with Israel.

Boys between 15 and 18 years of age were put through military drills at the week-long camp, including shooting with live ammunition and training in scouting skills.

Hamas official Ashraf Abu Zayed said the training came within the framework of "preparing for the liberation of Palestine".

"We are trying to invest the younger generation and guide them towards the liberation project," he told AFP, referring to armed struggle against Israel.

 

[louie888]

The Hitler Youth summer camps run by the Hamas...

Like the Hitler Youth summer camps run by the fake jews?

Oh, wait, that is actually real. I know, awkward.

 

[Hollie]

The Hitler Youth summer camps run by the Hamas...

Like the Hitler Youth summer camps run by the fake jews?

View attachment 144549

Oh, wait, that is actually real. I know, awkward.

Are you suggesting you find the Hamas styled Hitler Youth camps somehow.... awkward?

You shouldn't.

Killing Jews as religious practice is a basic message of Hamas, which believes that the muhammedan struggle against Jews—not only Israelis—and eventual extermination of Jews at the hands of Muhammedans is intrinsic to Islam. Hamas includes this message in its charter:

The Avalon Project : Hamas Covenant 1988

Hamas Charter Introduction: "Our struggle against the Jews is extremely wide-ranging and grave..."

Article 28: "Israel, by virtue of its being Jewish and of having a Jewish population, defies Islam and the Muslims..."

Article 7: "Hamas has been looking forward to implement Allah's promise whatever time it might take. The prophet (prayer and peace be upon him) said [in a Hadith]: 'The time (of Resurrection) will not come until Muslims will fight the Jews; until the Jews hide behind rocks and trees, which will cry: o Muslim! there is a Jew hiding behind me, come and kill him!'"


I know right, awkward.