All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[montelatici]

Let's put it another way. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rights?

You will never get it. The Jews of Europe with the support of British arms went to Palestine to rule over the native people taking away the native people's right to self-determination and ultimately dispossessing them of their land and the sovreignty that had been promised to them. Until you understand what actually happened, in the raw, there will never be a solution. It has to do with rights taken away from native people by the British to give them to the European Jews. It was a crime that ran counter to International Law at the time. It was the Palestinians that were forced to give up their rights by the force of British arms.

 

[Hollie]

Let's put it another way. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rights?

You will never get it. The Jews of Europe with the support of British arms went to Palestine to rule over the native people taking away the native people's right to self-determination and ultimately dispossessing them of their land and the sovreignty that had been promised to them. Until you understand what actually happened, in the raw, there will never be a solution. It has to do with rights taken away from native people by the British to give them to the European Jews. It was a crime that ran counter to International Law at the time. It was the Palestinians that were forced to give up their rights by the force of British arms.

You're quite taqiyya addled. The news of Europe went the area of Palestine, not your invented "country of Pal'istan" because they were invited to re-establish their national home.

Any student of history can identify that it was, at different times, the muhammedan invaders and the European Christian Crusaders / colonists who were the invaders.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Let's put it another way. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rights?

You will never get it. The Jews of Europe with the support of British arms went to Palestine to rule over the native people taking away the native people's right to self-determination and ultimately dispossessing them of their land and the sovreignty that had been promised to them. Until you understand what actually happened, in the raw, there will never be a solution. It has to do with rights taken away from native people by the British to give them to the European Jews. It was a crime that ran counter to International Law at the time. It was the Palestinians that were forced to give up their rights by the force of British arms.

You're quite taqiyya addled. The news of Europe went the area of Palestine, not your invented "country of Pal'istan" because they were invited to re-establish their national home.

Any student of history can identify that it was, at different times, the muhammedan invaders and the European Christian Crusaders / colonists who were the invaders.

Montelatici is correct. You are shoveling crap.

 

[Hollie]

Let's put it another way. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rights?

You will never get it. The Jews of Europe with the support of British arms went to Palestine to rule over the native people taking away the native people's right to self-determination and ultimately dispossessing them of their land and the sovreignty that had been promised to them. Until you understand what actually happened, in the raw, there will never be a solution. It has to do with rights taken away from native people by the British to give them to the European Jews. It was a crime that ran counter to International Law at the time. It was the Palestinians that were forced to give up their rights by the force of British arms.

You're quite taqiyya addled. The news of Europe went the area of Palestine, not your invented "country of Pal'istan" because they were invited to re-establish their national home.

Any student of history can identify that it was, at different times, the muhammedan invaders and the European Christian Crusaders / colonists who were the invaders.

Montelatici is correct. You are shoveling crap.

Actually, he's not correct, you angry little muhammedan.

 

[Shusha]

Let's put it another way. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rights?

You will never get it. The Jews of Europe with the support of British arms went to Palestine to rule over the native people taking away the native people's right to self-determination and ultimately dispossessing them of their land and the sovreignty that had been promised to them. Until you understand what actually happened, in the raw, there will never be a solution. It has to do with rights taken away from native people by the British to give them to the European Jews. It was a crime that ran counter to International Law at the time. It was the Palestinians that were forced to give up their rights by the force of British arms.

The Jewish people, collectively, also have rights as the indigenous, First Nations, peoples. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rigts to their historical, ancestral and religious homeland?

Why do you negate human rights when it comes to the Jewish people?

 

[louie888]

The Jewish people, collectively, also have rights as the indigenous, First Nations, peoples. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rigts to their historical, ancestral and religious homeland?

Why do you negate human rights when it comes to the Jewish people?

No people have the right to thieve and murder.

This is another easy one.

 

[Shusha]

The Jewish people, collectively, also have rights as the indigenous, First Nations, peoples. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rigts to their historical, ancestral and religious homeland?

Why do you negate human rights when it comes to the Jewish people?

No people have the right to thieve and murder.

This is another easy one.

Which is exactly why Israel should be returned to its First Nation Jewish owners.

 

[louie888]

Nope. Monte nailed it...

You will never get it. The Jews of Europe with the support of British arms went to Palestine to rule over the native people taking away the native people's right to self-determination and ultimately dispossessing them of their land and the sovreignty that had been promised to them. Until you understand what actually happened, in the raw, there will never be a solution. It has to do with rights taken away from native people by the British to give them to the European Jews. It was a crime that ran counter to International Law at the time. It was the Palestinians that were forced to give up their rights by the force of British arms.

 

[montelatici]

Let's put it another way. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rights?

You will never get it. The Jews of Europe with the support of British arms went to Palestine to rule over the native people taking away the native people's right to self-determination and ultimately dispossessing them of their land and the sovreignty that had been promised to them. Until you understand what actually happened, in the raw, there will never be a solution. It has to do with rights taken away from native people by the British to give them to the European Jews. It was a crime that ran counter to International Law at the time. It was the Palestinians that were forced to give up their rights by the force of British arms.

The Jewish people, collectively, also have rights as the indigenous, First Nations, peoples. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rigts to their historical, ancestral and religious homeland?

Why do you negate human rights when it comes to the Jewish people?

There are people of various ancestries that practice various religions. Adherence to a particular religion does not imply a particular ancestry. Religion does not imply ancestry. Though Christianity originated in Palestine, Christians have varied ancestries, just as people of varied ancestries practice Judaism.

You are barking up the wrong tree.

 

[montelatici]

The Jewish people, collectively, also have rights as the indigenous, First Nations, peoples. Why should the Jewish people be forced to give up their rigts to their historical, ancestral and religious homeland?

Why do you negate human rights when it comes to the Jewish people?

No people have the right to thieve and murder.

This is another easy one.

Which is exactly why Israel should be returned to its First Nation Jewish owners.

The Palestinians are the First Nation owners, and their ancestors converted to Christianity long ago. Even Zionist websites confirm the fact.

"Native Population almost wholly descended from Jews who had been forcibly converted to Christianity, and later Islam, not Arab in origin
In Palestine the "small" number of Arab invaders who had been imported by the Arabian conquerors were wiped out by disease. Thus the "myth" of the "Palestinian Arab" descending "from the Arab conquerors" appears to be factually incorrect ....."

Native Population almost wholly descended from Jews who had been forcibly converted

 

[Sixties Fan]

“Early this morning security forces stopped two people approaching the southern border (with Egypt),” an interior ministry spokesman in the Hamas-run territory said in a statement.
“One of them blew himself up,” it added.
Later a medical source confirmed a member of Hamas had died in the attack.

The source named the man as Nidal al-Jaafari, 28.Here is the late Mr. Jaafari.


Notice that he is a member of the Al Qassam Brigades, Hamas' "militant wing." But he is also a guard - which means according to the Goldstone report and the PCHR, he is a civilian.

Hamas doesn't distinguish between civilians and their "militants." Yet the world keeps pretending that there is a distinction.

(full article online)

Irony alert: Terrorist groups upset at being the target of a suicide bomber ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Sixties Fan]

Yes, Hamas is deeply concerned about the environment. It is so liberal when it is being prevented from murdering Jews.

But you can be sure that the anti-Israel Left will latch onto the second argument as a reason to oppose Israel's defensive measures. As always, the real reason they oppose any Israeli defenses are the first reason given in this article - Israelis shouldn't be able to defend themselves, period.

Which is exactly what Yousef Munayyer, a BDS leader, tweeted the other day:

(full article online)

Now they claim Israel's underground Gaza barrier will hurt the environment ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News

 

[Sixties Fan]

This year marks 100 years since the Balfour Declaration on November 2, 1917 which endorsed “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People.” The declaration became the basis for the League of Nations (precursor to the United Nations) to endorse the Palestine Mandate which clearly articulated the history and rights of Jews to a reconstituted national homeland in the area now commonly thought of as Gaza, Israel, the West Bank and Jordan.



Article 25 of the Mandate allowed the administrator (Britain) to change the contours of the reestablished Jewish homeland.
------
The League of Nations considered at the outset of its endorsement of a Jewish national home in 1920 and 1922 that perhaps the contours of such homeland should exclude the land east of the Jordan River. But international law has – and continues to fail – in two major respects:

• In JORDAN: The provision (Article 25) to cut the eastern part of the Mandate (and ONLY the eastern part) from the Jewish homeland specifically did not allow the discrimination against Jews from buying land or obtaining citizenship there;
• In the WEST BANK: All of the land west of the Jordan River was allocated for a Jewish homeland, and obviously with full legal authorization for Jews to purchase homes and obtain citizenship, despite calls by the current Palestinian Authority leadership to have a Jew-free country

(full article online)

The Original Nakba: The Division of “TransJordan”

 

[louie888]

This year marks 100 years since the Balfour Declaration on November 2, 1917 which endorsed “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People.”

This is when the world knew that horror would reign in our holy land.

And it is just as logical as Canada giving Texas to Mexico.

Think.

 

[Sixties Fan]

Therefore, perhaps what we have here is cynical abuse, by leaders, of altruistic and pro-social individuals who want to do the right thing for their families. Knowing that their society places a high value on suicide terrorism (the martyr is a hero, the martyr’s family receives a lifelong stipend), perhaps the enmeshed offspring sees this act as rewarding the parent for having raised him or her and perhaps the emotionally neglected offspring sees this as a way to have value in the eyes of the unseeing undervaluing parent. The constant incitement we see in the Palestinian Authority may be the way by which leaders counteract the Islamic injunction to put one’s parents’ needs above jihad.

(full article online)

Surprising New Study On The Motives Of A Suicide Terrorist - Israel Diaries

 

[montelatici]

This year marks 100 years since the Balfour Declaration on November 2, 1917 which endorsed “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People.” The declaration became the basis for the League of Nations (precursor to the United Nations) to endorse the Palestine Mandate which clearly articulated the history and rights of Jews to a reconstituted national homeland in the area now commonly thought of as Gaza, Israel, the West Bank and Jordan.



Article 25 of the Mandate allowed the administrator (Britain) to change the contours of the reestablished Jewish homeland.
------
The League of Nations considered at the outset of its endorsement of a Jewish national home in 1920 and 1922 that perhaps the contours of such homeland should exclude the land east of the Jordan River. But international law has – and continues to fail – in two major respects:

• In JORDAN: The provision (Article 25) to cut the eastern part of the Mandate (and ONLY the eastern part) from the Jewish homeland specifically did not allow the discrimination against Jews from buying land or obtaining citizenship there;
• In the WEST BANK: All of the land west of the Jordan River was allocated for a Jewish homeland, and obviously with full legal authorization for Jews to purchase homes and obtain citizenship, despite calls by the current Palestinian Authority leadership to have a Jew-free country

(full article online)

The Original Nakba: The Division of “TransJordan”

What the British stated as the Mandatory's policy in June of 1922 was:

 

[Sixties Fan]

This year marks 100 years since the Balfour Declaration on November 2, 1917 which endorsed “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People.”

This is when the world knew that horror would reign in our holy land.

And it is just as logical as Canada giving Texas to Mexico.

Think.

Think, says the person who does not think at all.

"Your" holy land?

It only became "holy" when the Jews regained sovereignty over their ancestral home. Even if only 20% of it. The rest continues to be in the hands of the invading conquerors known as Arab Muslims.

 

[Sixties Fan]

This year marks 100 years since the Balfour Declaration on November 2, 1917 which endorsed “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People.” The declaration became the basis for the League of Nations (precursor to the United Nations) to endorse the Palestine Mandate which clearly articulated the history and rights of Jews to a reconstituted national homeland in the area now commonly thought of as Gaza, Israel, the West Bank and Jordan.



Article 25 of the Mandate allowed the administrator (Britain) to change the contours of the reestablished Jewish homeland.
------
The League of Nations considered at the outset of its endorsement of a Jewish national home in 1920 and 1922 that perhaps the contours of such homeland should exclude the land east of the Jordan River. But international law has – and continues to fail – in two major respects:

• In JORDAN: The provision (Article 25) to cut the eastern part of the Mandate (and ONLY the eastern part) from the Jewish homeland specifically did not allow the discrimination against Jews from buying land or obtaining citizenship there;
• In the WEST BANK: All of the land west of the Jordan River was allocated for a Jewish homeland, and obviously with full legal authorization for Jews to purchase homes and obtain citizenship, despite calls by the current Palestinian Authority leadership to have a Jew-free country

(full article online)

The Original Nakba: The Division of “TransJordan”

What the British stated as the Mandatory's policy in June of 1922 was:

View attachment 144231

No link?

Oh....you don't want to be found out? OK.

 

[Sixties Fan]

[ The Arab League. The one which did not exist during the Ottoman conquest of the Land of Israel. The one which did not help the Arabs, or Jews, or anyone else, get rid of the Muslim Turkish conquerors for 400 years the Turks lost the land during WWI. Yeah, T

The Arab League has adopted some of the Palestinian Authority’s most odious libels and is disseminating them as if they were facts. The following is from a new official report of the Arab League’s Department of Palestine and Occupied Arab Territories:
“The Arab League condemned the ongoing Israeli crimes against the Palestinian people, and particularly the holding of the Martyrs’ (Shahids’) bodies and theft of their organs, the legislation of additional racist laws, and the proposal of 120 racist laws against the prisoners... carrying out medical experiments on the prisoners within the prisons... it has even intentionally killed prisoners, whether through medical negligence or [after] abducting them to secret prisons.”
[Official PA daily Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, Aug. 15, 2017

Arab League lies: Israel does medical experiments on prisoners and murders them - PMW Bulletins

 

[montelatici]

This year marks 100 years since the Balfour Declaration on November 2, 1917 which endorsed “the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish People.” The declaration became the basis for the League of Nations (precursor to the United Nations) to endorse the Palestine Mandate which clearly articulated the history and rights of Jews to a reconstituted national homeland in the area now commonly thought of as Gaza, Israel, the West Bank and Jordan.



Article 25 of the Mandate allowed the administrator (Britain) to change the contours of the reestablished Jewish homeland.
------
The League of Nations considered at the outset of its endorsement of a Jewish national home in 1920 and 1922 that perhaps the contours of such homeland should exclude the land east of the Jordan River. But international law has – and continues to fail – in two major respects:

• In JORDAN: The provision (Article 25) to cut the eastern part of the Mandate (and ONLY the eastern part) from the Jewish homeland specifically did not allow the discrimination against Jews from buying land or obtaining citizenship there;
• In the WEST BANK: All of the land west of the Jordan River was allocated for a Jewish homeland, and obviously with full legal authorization for Jews to purchase homes and obtain citizenship, despite calls by the current Palestinian Authority leadership to have a Jew-free country

(full article online)

The Original Nakba: The Division of “TransJordan”

What the British stated as the Mandatory's policy in June of 1922 was:

View attachment 144231

No link?

Oh....you don't want to be found out? OK.

I never get "found out" I present the facts. It is you people that have never bothered to do any research and only spout Hasbara propaganda that get found out.

"Unauthorized statements have been made to the effect that the purpose in view is to create a wholly Jewish Palestine. Phrases have been used such as that Palestine is to become "as Jewish as England is English." HMG regard any such expectation as impracticable and have no such aim in view. Nor have they at any time contemplated, as appears to be feared by the Arab Delegation, the disappearance or the subordination of the Arabic population, language or culture in Palestine. They would draw attention to the fact that the terms of the Declaration referred to do not contemplate that Palestine as a whole should be converted into a Jewish National Home, but that such a Home should be founded in Palestine."

"Churchill White Paper" - UK Secretary of State for the Colonies (3 June 1922)