All The News Anti-Israel Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

Status
Not open for further replies.
Being against ALL Israeli policies to protect the nation and its inhabitants IS antisemitism.

Thank you!

Frankly, I have seen very little in the way of reasoned discussion about Israeli governmental policies on-campus. Perhaps P F Tinmore can provide a some brief examples.
You haven't been following my posts.

We follow your posts alright. And very well. And it is always about how the Jews are not the indigenous people and STOLE someone else's land.

Two words for you on your endless sad song:

GET LOST
 
aquifers exceeds replenishment by about 140 MCM/year. Even without the electricity-run sewage treatment plants, the solutions above would be able to half that deficit and would go a long way toward providing the water needs of the Gazan population. And none of these solutions have anything to do with Israel.

The authors do find a way to involve Israel in their water problem, but only in one small paragraph in which they claim that Egypt and Israel prevent the free flow of construction materials and fuel. It is always convenient to blame Israel for maintaining a blockade of Gaza, even if it is not true.

(full article online)

Gaza Water Libel Actually Unsupported By Gazan Academics - Israel Diaries
 
The Turkish program included many schools from the Arab sector in Israel. In addition to transportation, Mirasimiz purchased water and sandwiches for the rioting Muslims to the tune of $2.12 million.

Also on the Mirasimiz list of expenses: according to the Shin Bet, in exchange for their stay on the Temple Mount and their constant provocation of Jewish visitors, every member of the Moraviton and Morabitat received a monthly stipend of about $1,200.

(full article online)

Report: Turks Invested Millions in Fanning Flames on Temple MountThe Jewish Press | David Israel | 1 Tammuz 5777 – June 25, 2017 | JewishPress.com
 
Now it is true that the Maccabiah Games is primarily for Jews worldwide, but it is up to individual countries' Maccabiah committees to decide who is eligible. So Argentina will allow non-Jews with Jewish spouses to participate, for example.

But does Alpher object to the Gay Games? To the Deaflympics or Paralympics or Special Olympics? To the Asian Games that exclude Israel? All of which have criteria that do not allow everyone to participate?

Alpher doesn't explore these questions. Instead, he says "The Maccabiah Games is a racist event that makes the 1936 Berlin Olympics seem liberal."

It is a waste of time to be offended by such stupidity. Alpher, like other Haaretz columnists, long ago stopped trying to make cogent arguments and instead now compete in their own games - to see how much they can outdo each other in insulting Israel.

(full article online)

Haaretz op-ed calls to boycott Maccabiah Games as "racist" - even though Arabs participate ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
Where to even begin??

  • There was never any allocation of anything to anybody in 1949. Israel’s neighbors attacked, in the first of many attempts to destroy all of Israel. The 1949 Armistice Line is simply where Israel managed to turn them back, in a desperate bid to survive the assault.
  • Nonetheless, Minister Lieberman was not even talking about lands beyond the 1949 Armistice Line as O’Connor claims, but rather lands within the line, lands which (once again) most of the world simply calls, “Israel.”
Understanding Lieberman’s statement doesn’t actually require deep historical knowledge, but rather a working grasp of basic English. Is that really too much to ask of a professional journalist?

(full article online)

Hey Newsweek: Israelis Want Their Country Back | HonestReporting
 

Good. The Tomb of the Patriarchs is a Jewish holy site. As such, it must be under Israeli control. Now and always.

And its ridiculous the Palestinians claim that Israel puts the site in danger by using tear gas to quell Palestinian riots. The only danger to the Tomb of the Patriarchs comes from Arab Palestinians.

The current arrangement at the Tomb of the Patriarchs is fine. The Tomb is divided into a mosque and a synagogue, and each side gets the site completely for 10 days a year. But being the snakes they are, the Muslims often desecrate the synagogue part when they get the site completely. So if anyone is putting the site in danger, it's the Muslims doing so.
 

Good. The Tomb of the Patriarchs is a Jewish holy site. As such, it must be under Israeli control. Now and always.

And its ridiculous the Palestinians claim that Israel puts the site in danger by using tear gas to quell Palestinian riots. The only danger to the Tomb of the Patriarchs comes from Arab Palestinians.

The current arrangement at the Tomb of the Patriarchs is fine. The Tomb is divided into a mosque and a synagogue, and each side gets the site completely for 10 days a year. But being the snakes they are, the Muslims often desecrate the synagogue part when they get the site completely. So if anyone is putting the site in danger, it's the Muslims doing so.

The current arrangement works because it is under Israeli control. Would you say?

It is not my intent to suggest that Muslims be prevented from visiting the site and the mosque there. Far from it. My point is that only Israel can guarantee that freedom of faith and preservation of the site.
 
Where to even begin??

  • There was never any allocation of anything to anybody in 1949. Israel’s neighbors attacked, in the first of many attempts to destroy all of Israel. The 1949 Armistice Line is simply where Israel managed to turn them back, in a desperate bid to survive the assault.
  • Nonetheless, Minister Lieberman was not even talking about lands beyond the 1949 Armistice Line as O’Connor claims, but rather lands within the line, lands which (once again) most of the world simply calls, “Israel.”
Understanding Lieberman’s statement doesn’t actually require deep historical knowledge, but rather a working grasp of basic English. Is that really too much to ask of a professional journalist?

(full article online)

Hey Newsweek: Israelis Want Their Country Back | HonestReporting

The Arab League did not "attack" Israel. The League's intervention was limited to entering the Arab and International portions of the partition plan (already invaded by the Europeans) to try to prevent the eviction and continued massacre of the native people by the European colonists.
 
Where to even begin??

  • There was never any allocation of anything to anybody in 1949. Israel’s neighbors attacked, in the first of many attempts to destroy all of Israel. The 1949 Armistice Line is simply where Israel managed to turn them back, in a desperate bid to survive the assault.
  • Nonetheless, Minister Lieberman was not even talking about lands beyond the 1949 Armistice Line as O’Connor claims, but rather lands within the line, lands which (once again) most of the world simply calls, “Israel.”
Understanding Lieberman’s statement doesn’t actually require deep historical knowledge, but rather a working grasp of basic English. Is that really too much to ask of a professional journalist?

(full article online)

Hey Newsweek: Israelis Want Their Country Back | HonestReporting

The Arab League did not "attack" Israel. The League's intervention was limited to entering the Arab and International portions of the partition plan (already invaded by the Europeans) to try to prevent the eviction and continued massacre of the native people by the European colonists.
Where to even begin??

  • There was never any allocation of anything to anybody in 1949. Israel’s neighbors attacked, in the first of many attempts to destroy all of Israel. The 1949 Armistice Line is simply where Israel managed to turn them back, in a desperate bid to survive the assault.
  • Nonetheless, Minister Lieberman was not even talking about lands beyond the 1949 Armistice Line as O’Connor claims, but rather lands within the line, lands which (once again) most of the world simply calls, “Israel.”
Understanding Lieberman’s statement doesn’t actually require deep historical knowledge, but rather a working grasp of basic English. Is that really too much to ask of a professional journalist?

(full article online)

Hey Newsweek: Israelis Want Their Country Back | HonestReporting

The Arab League did not "attack" Israel. The League's intervention was limited to entering the Arab and International portions of the partition plan (already invaded by the Europeans) to try to prevent the eviction and continued massacre of the native people by the European colonists.

Israel was attacked by the muhammedan armies. Why do you keep making a fool of yourself with your clown dancing?

S/766 of 22 May 1948

What follows is one of several questions posed on behalf of the UN and the Israeli response.

(h) Have Arab forces penetrated into the territory over which you claim to have authority?


Answer to Question (h): Arab forces have penetrated into the territory of the State of Israel in certain corners of the Northern Negev and in the Jordan Valley south of Lake Tiberias. In addition, planes of the Royal Egyptian Air Force have repeatedly raided Tel Aviv and southern Jewish settlements, while Iraqi air-force planes have been raiding settlements in the Northern Jordan Valley and artillery of the Syrian and Lebanese armies have been shelling settlements in Upper Galilee from across the frontier.
 
This month marks the tenth anniversary of the violent Hamas coup that took control over the 1.9 million Palestinians in the Gaza Strip. There is still no end in sight to their predicament – but this is most certainly not because Hamas enjoys popular support among the local population. In fact, reliable data from a new survey conducted there May 16-25 by a professional, independent Palestinian pollster demonstrate that only 14 percent of Gazans self-identify as Hamas supporters. That is far behind the popularity of Fatah, which runs the Ramallah-based Palestinian Authority (PA), which garners 41 percent of Gazans’ self-professed affiliation. Indeed, the large majority of Gazans – 77 percent, including 41 percent who feel strongly about it – agree that “the PA should send officials and security officers to Gaza, to take over the administration there.”

(full article online)

What Gazans Really Want: Hard Data About A Hard Problem
 
Haaretz reports that over the past two months, the number of vouchers issued by the PA to allow Gazans to travel outside the sector for medical treatment has plummeted from over 2000 a month to a few dozen. Some 90% of the requests are being ignored.

People with cancer and heart disease who had been treated in Israel cannot resume their treatments. Children who have been traveling regularly to hospitals in Israel are stuck and their parents are frantic.

And, as I previously reported, the PA has stopped shipments of anesthetic to Gaza, meaning that most operations cannot be performed in Gaza itself.

(full article online)

Palestinian Authority barring Gaza medical patients from treatment in Israel ~ Elder Of Ziyon - Israel News
 
(Again, why is the PA "governing" the self-governing Hamas and Gaza? It would be the same as Germany "governing" Austria )

A month ago, Farjoun contacted Liberman and Elkin, as well as COGAT Coordinator Yoav Mordechai, and warned them about the sanitation hazards presented by the sewage flowing from the sewage treatment facility in northern Gaza's Beit Hanoun into the Hanoun Stream.

"As we expected, the solid sewage flows into the Shikma Stream, causing an awful stench and polluting the coastal aquifer," the Hof Ashkelon Regional Council said, noting that they have already begun the cleanup.

(full article online)

'We give Gaza fresh water and they give us back raw sewage'
 

Good. The Tomb of the Patriarchs is a Jewish holy site. As such, it must be under Israeli control. Now and always.

And its ridiculous the Palestinians claim that Israel puts the site in danger by using tear gas to quell Palestinian riots. The only danger to the Tomb of the Patriarchs comes from Arab Palestinians.

The current arrangement at the Tomb of the Patriarchs is fine. The Tomb is divided into a mosque and a synagogue, and each side gets the site completely for 10 days a year. But being the snakes they are, the Muslims often desecrate the synagogue part when they get the site completely. So if anyone is putting the site in danger, it's the Muslims doing so.

The current arrangement works because it is under Israeli control. Would you say?

It is not my intent to suggest that Muslims be prevented from visiting the site and the mosque there. Far from it. My point is that only Israel can guarantee that freedom of faith and preservation of the site.


Yes, that is true. Muslims believe that Joseph is buried in the Tomb of the Patriarchs in Hebron, so they've set fire to the real Joseph's Tomb in Nablus several times. And they've attacked Rachel's Tomb in Bethlehem. That's why the Israelis had to build an ugly fortress over the lovely Rachel's Tomb.
 
This animated video says it all about refugees. The reason why there are refugees in Israel is completely based on a pan-Arabic plan to defeat the State of Israel and throw the Jews into the Mediterranean.

This was followed by the creation of a massive refugee crisis – a Jewish refugee crisis. The State of Israel – a fledgling country with less than 1 million citizens, absorbed more than 1.5 million Jewish refugees in a span of 3-4 years.

Meanwhile, the Arab refugees – who had left parts of the newly created State of Israel were NOT absorbed by neighboring Arab countries in order to create a powder keg of worldwide pressure on Israel’s borders.

The pressure that the world places on Israel to solve the refugee crisis should be reverted to Israel’s neighbors – Jordan, Syria, Lebanon, and Egypt. They created the problem and they are the true solution – even if it takes decades to carry through.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top