All of you defenders of Islamic terrorist groups... TAKE A LOOK at what you defend!

[healthmyths]

What needs to be done to combat these terrorist threats is first and foremost a change of strategy. Many leaders in the Western world and even the Egyptian president are now using rhetoric that labels the true enemy. At a recent news conference in the U.S., British prime minister David Cameron bluntly described the problem as a “very serious Islamist extremist terrorist threat…But most important of all, we must also fight this poisonous ideology starting at home.”

French prime minister Manuel Valls said about his nationʼs terrorist attacks, “It is a war against terrorism, against jihadism, against radical Islam, against everything that is aimed at breaking fraternity, freedom, solidarity. Journalists were killed because they defended freedom. Policemen were killed because they were protecting you. Jews were killed because they were Jewish. The indignation must be absolute and total – not for three days only, but permanently.”

Egypt’s President El Sisi stated, “It's inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire Islamic world to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing, and destruction for the rest of the world. … Does this mean that 1.6 billion people [Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world's inhabitants that is 7 billion, so that they themselves may live?”

Even as terrorism is exploding all across Europe, President Obama is still spreading the false narrative. At his latest news conference, he stayed the rhetorical course, calling the threat “violent extremism.”
He has constantly failed to clearly state the obvious perpetrator and enemy: Islamic terrorists.
Articles When Will Obama Get a Grip on Islamic Terrorism

And this is what makes you FFOs and Obama "Defenders of Islamic terrorist groups"... you won't call them for what they are!

 

[healthmyths]

Another example of modern day NOT hundreds of years ago...BUT today and yet you EIT apologists don't get it!

Breitbart News previously reported the case of two boys “crucified” for eating in Ramadan on 23 June in Deir ez-Zour.
For IS the punishment does not necessarily mean execution by nailing or tying victims to a cross. The group uses crosses and bars to pose dead bodies as a means of terrorising local populations or as a means of publicly shaming those who breach the tenets of sharia law as interpreted by IS.
Five Children Among 94 Crucified Flogged And Caged By ISIS For Eating During Ramadan - Breitbart

And you idiots keep bringing up events that happened 500 years ago! And NOT all Christians participated in those events!
But these are events occurring TODAY and apologists like Obama and all you FFOs still don't see the gross difference!
SAD!!!

 

[JakeStarkey]

hm, you are now a propaganda plant for some organization. You are not bright enough to do this yourself. Who are you working for? You are now off OP: no one here is defending jihadists.

Get back on OP and stop trolling your own thread.

 

[healthmyths]

hm, you are now a propaganda plant for some organization. You are not bright enough to do this yourself. Who are you working for? You are now off OP: no one here is defending jihadists.

Get back on OP and stop trolling your own thread.

So why are you protesting me?
You are protesting me by saying YOU know that no one here is defending EITs...but when I point out that people like you and Obama
use the moral equivalency i.e. Christian crusades hundreds of years ago just as bad as EITs teaching children how to behead... YOU are
defending the EITs!
Don't you understand? That is why I constantly have to remind you!
When you and your ilk can't recognize that what happened hundreds of years while bad has NO equivalency though with the current barbarians that teach beheading. Nothing like that was ever done in the past by Christians yet you and Obama paint with a broad brush ALL Christians yet by your hesitancy you won't agree there is NO moral equivalency with today's EITs!

 

[JakeStarkey]

We have pointed out that your assertion is nonsense without any evidence. When your ilk grow up and get off your holier than thou attitude, we can make some advances. Right now, this is an LEO issue here, and we will keep it that way. Over there, we are not sending an army again. Your arguments are mere trolling, nothing more.

As far as complicit of all religionists, either all are complicity, some are complicit, none are complicity. Your argumentation is all over the mark. Focus, please.

 

[healthmyths]

We have pointed out that your assertion is nonsense without any evidence. When your ilk grow up and get off your holier than thou attitude, we can make some advances. Right now, this is an LEO issue here, and we will keep it that way. Over there, we are not sending an army again. Your arguments are mere trolling, nothing more.

As far as complicit of all religionists, either all are complicity, some are complicit, none are complicity. Your argumentation is all over the mark. Focus, please.

Here is my proof there are EITs on this board and you are a good example.
Instead of agreeing that ALL Christians which Obama a EITs defender were painted with a broad brush as components of the Crusades therefore all Christians were bad.
But you as well as Obama keep making any one like my self that constantly refers to the terrorists as Extreme Islamic Terrorists as incorrect and YOU and Obama will not use that term. Again... read this:

French prime minister Manuel Valls said about his nationʼs terrorist attacks, “It is a war against terrorism, against jihadism, against radical Islam, against everything that is aimed at breaking fraternity, freedom, solidarity. Journalists were killed because they defended freedom. Policemen were killed because they were protecting you. Jews were killed because they were Jewish. The indignation must be absolute and total – not for three days only, but permanently.”

Egypt’s President El Sisi stated, “It's inconceivable that the thinking that we hold most sacred should cause the entire Islamic world to be a source of anxiety, danger, killing, and destruction for the rest of the world. … Does this mean that 1.6 billion people [Muslims] should want to kill the rest of the world's inhabitants that is 7 billion, so that they themselves may live?”

Even as terrorism is exploding all across Europe, President Obama is still spreading the false narrative. At his latest news conference, he stayed the rhetorical course, calling the threat “violent extremism.”
He has constantly failed to clearly state the obvious perpetrator and enemy: Islamic terrorists.
Articles When Will Obama Get a Grip on Islamic Terrorism

And this is what makes you FFOs and Obama "Defenders of Islamic terrorist groups"... you won't call them for what they are!