Aliens

Any and all attacks against the Zionist Israeli security forces and their supporters and collaborators, just as in WW2 when the various European resistance movements against the Nazis carried out similar attacks. Had the French, Dutch or Polish Resistance fired rockets into Germany, they would have been praised for their ingenuity, it's all a matter of perpective.




And now the laws and rules are different, so you are trying to blame the Jews for the attacks. IT IS NOW ILLEGAL TO TARGET CIVILIANS and this is what hamas is doing, so the world should give them a taste of their own medicine and drop whizz-bangs on them

Hamas' weapons are incapable of "targeting" civilians; only the Zionist's weapons have that capability.




So Iranian grad missiles are not capable of targeting civilians, IED's are not capable of targeting civilians, anti tank missiles are not capable of targeting civilians, depleted uranium rounds fired from a semi automatic are not apable of targeting civilians. Do you the rest of the weapons used by hamas that can target civilians, until we are down to qassams that have been designated a prohibited weapon

The key word here is "targeting", get it?





I do but it seems that you don't as hamas uses many weapons that are targeted at Israeli children, and the ones that cant are designated under International Law as prohibited weapons.
But why let such a little thing as this steer you away from your Jew Hatred and Nazi Anti Semitism

:bsflag:
 
And now the laws and rules are different, so you are trying to blame the Jews for the attacks. IT IS NOW ILLEGAL TO TARGET CIVILIANS and this is what hamas is doing, so the world should give them a taste of their own medicine and drop whizz-bangs on them

Hamas' weapons are incapable of "targeting" civilians; only the Zionist's weapons have that capability.




So Iranian grad missiles are not capable of targeting civilians, IED's are not capable of targeting civilians, anti tank missiles are not capable of targeting civilians, depleted uranium rounds fired from a semi automatic are not apable of targeting civilians. Do you the rest of the weapons used by hamas that can target civilians, until we are down to qassams that have been designated a prohibited weapon

The key word here is "targeting", get it?





I do but it seems that you don't as hamas uses many weapons that are targeted at Israeli children, and the ones that cant are designated under International Law as prohibited weapons.
But why let such a little thing as this steer you away from your Jew Hatred and Nazi Anti Semitism

:bsflag:




Then prove it as they have been found to have Iranian grad missiles for starters, and semi automatics can be targeted. But this seems to be your standard answer when you are shown to be wrong
 
Tell us what happened to all these different ethnicities in POST ISLAMIC ARABIA:

Nestorian Christianity, Judaism and Zoroastrianism. Nestorian Christianity was the dominant religion in Eastern Arabia prior to the advent of Islam. In the latter stages of the pre-Islamic era, Christianity gained converts with some unorthodox sects, such as the gnostics having a presence.

Another one too lazy or to stupid to read and find out for themselves. :rolleyes:

Here, read this The Great Arab Conquests How The Spread Of Islam Changed The World We Live In Amazon.co.uk Hugh Kennedy 9780753823897 Books

Islam spread by violence, the Caliphates were obtained through Jihad, you ignorant fool...

No. The initial Arab "conquests" were the result of a "unified" group of "opportunists" filling the power vacuum left by the result of a 26 year long war between the two "superpowers" of the age the Romano-Byzantines and the Sassanian Persians, that left both empires devastated. The Arabs fought no more than one or two decisive battles against the Byzantines, destroying their field armies and the cities and towns of Egypt and the Levant (Palestine and Syria) surrendered to them. There was no mass slaughter of civillians, no forced conversion, no expulsions, except of those Byzantine nobles who refused to convert; they were allowed to leave the area unharmed. No churches were destroyed or desecrated and the natives were allowed to administer themselves as they had before. The only differences were that they had to pay taxes to their conquerers. The tax could be avoided altogether if they converted to Islam and the Muslims even tried to stop mass conversions as they reduced their tax base. It took centuries for the region to convert to Islam, that's historical fact, not Islamophobic propaganda.

There's another book availble on the subject by the historian Tom Holland, In The Shadow Of The Sword - Tom Holland that postulates the idea that the overwhelming bulk of Arabs in the 7th century that took part in the conquests were not even Muslims. Islam becoming a "state" religion much later. This book caused a bit of a controversy in 2012 when a TV programme about it was shown on UK's Channel 4. TV historian Tom Holland triggers storm after calling Islam a made-up religion Daily Mail Online

What are you blaberring now? From the time Mohammad appeared on the scene, Islam spread through invasions and conquests. In India alone Islamic savages massacred over 90 million Hindus until they conquered it. And every nation Islam conquered, they forced the Arab religion, culture, and language down the people's throats at the point of the sword. Those who "converted willingly" knew what the consequences would be if they didn't.

Again, try reading some objective history, not Islamophobic propaganda. The only large scale massacres in India prior to the 1948 Partition, were perpertated by Timur-i-Lenk who was a Turko-Mongol warlord in the 14th century who used Islam more as a political tool to legitimise his rule, whereas his own religious beliefs remain a mystery. He's held responsible for depopulated vast areas of Asia and the Levant.

Islam spread as much through missionaries as did any other religion. The only people who claim 90million hindus were massacred by Muslims are those like Andrew Bostrom, who is not even a historian but an agenda driven Islamophobe, along with others like Daniel Pipes. Such accounts also tend to omit the Hindu massacres of Muslims.

If anyone is interested, here's a simplified but more objective account:
Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Hold on the Mongol Empire was virtually over by 1280 and the Mongols were never Muslims,and their territory never extended into the Levant or India for that matter......are you sure that you don't mean the Mughals who invaded India 1540 well after the collapse of the Mongols and Ghengis Khan and his sons ??????? they were Turkic/Persian peoples with some Mongol but should not be confused with the Mongols under the Great Khan...who were never Muslim steve
 
Last edited:

Islam spread by violence, the Caliphates were obtained through Jihad, you ignorant fool...

No. The initial Arab "conquests" were the result of a "unified" group of "opportunists" filling the power vacuum left by the result of a 26 year long war between the two "superpowers" of the age the Romano-Byzantines and the Sassanian Persians, that left both empires devastated. The Arabs fought no more than one or two decisive battles against the Byzantines, destroying their field armies and the cities and towns of Egypt and the Levant (Palestine and Syria) surrendered to them. There was no mass slaughter of civillians, no forced conversion, no expulsions, except of those Byzantine nobles who refused to convert; they were allowed to leave the area unharmed. No churches were destroyed or desecrated and the natives were allowed to administer themselves as they had before. The only differences were that they had to pay taxes to their conquerers. The tax could be avoided altogether if they converted to Islam and the Muslims even tried to stop mass conversions as they reduced their tax base. It took centuries for the region to convert to Islam, that's historical fact, not Islamophobic propaganda.

There's another book availble on the subject by the historian Tom Holland, In The Shadow Of The Sword - Tom Holland that postulates the idea that the overwhelming bulk of Arabs in the 7th century that took part in the conquests were not even Muslims. Islam becoming a "state" religion much later. This book caused a bit of a controversy in 2012 when a TV programme about it was shown on UK's Channel 4. TV historian Tom Holland triggers storm after calling Islam a made-up religion Daily Mail Online

What are you blaberring now? From the time Mohammad appeared on the scene, Islam spread through invasions and conquests. In India alone Islamic savages massacred over 90 million Hindus until they conquered it. And every nation Islam conquered, they forced the Arab religion, culture, and language down the people's throats at the point of the sword. Those who "converted willingly" knew what the consequences would be if they didn't.

Again, try reading some objective history, not Islamophobic propaganda. The only large scale massacres in India prior to the 1948 Partition, were perpertated by Timur-i-Lenk who was a Turko-Mongol warlord in the 14th century who used Islam more as a political tool to legitimise his rule, whereas his own religious beliefs remain a mystery. He's held responsible for depopulated vast areas of Asia and the Levant.

Islam spread as much through missionaries as did any other religion. The only people who claim 90million hindus were massacred by Muslims are those like Andrew Bostrom, who is not even a historian but an agenda driven Islamophobe, along with others like Daniel Pipes. Such accounts also tend to omit the Hindu massacres of Muslims.

If anyone is interested, here's a simplified but more objective account:
Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Hold on the Mongol Empire was virtually over by 1260 and the Mongols were never Muslims,and their territory never extended into the Levant or India for that matter......are you sure that you don't mean the Mogauls sic who invaded India after the collapse of the Mongols and Ghengis Khan and his sons ???????steve

Actually the Mongols actually did invade the Middle East. They sacked Bagdad but were stopped by the Muslim Mameluks in the Galilee.
 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
 
Are you still pimping Israel's terrorist propaganda crap?
....said the Hamas pimp terrorist spokesperson. :rofl:
Ooooooo, terrorists.

Quick, hide under the bed. :lol::lol::lol:

Google

  1. Hamas is designated as a terrorist organization by the European Union,Canada, Israel, Japan, and the United States. Australia and the United Kingdom have designated the military wing of Hamas, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, as a terrorist organization. The organization is banned in Jordan.
There's a reason for that Tinmore. They use and have used common terrorist tactics.

You refer to them as a resistance movement ( :lol: :lol: :lol: :cuckoo: ). What specific acts of Hamas would you refer to as being resistance?
So what were Jewish/Zionist Terrorists 1940 onwards...................do/doing......you got it you fool>>>>>>>>>>>>.........uncommon Terrorist Acts,at the time.....BUT NOW THE NORM....when you make a Post Toasty...I propose that in future YOU PUT YOUR BRAIN INTO GEAR...BEFORE OPENING YOUR MOUTH......it makes you look So Stupid when you don't..just sayin..steve.....SADLY YOU TERRORIST ZIONISTS HAVE TAUGHT THE REST OF THE WORLD ABOUT TERRORISM.....but you stand there as if you are one of the Moral Innocents...You make me laugh.......YOU ARE THE WORST OF THE WORST TERRORISTS......YOU ARE ZIONISTS......

As usual, all you have is another delusional rant which has absolutely nothing to do with my post. Then you have the audacity to tell me to use my brain when I post?
A bit of advice Steve, don't use the internet when you are off your meds. You're welcome.

"SADLY YOU TERRORIST ZIONISTS HAVE TAUGHT THE REST OF THE WORLD ABOUT TERRORISM"

Nah, that would be your Muslim friends who commit terrorist acts every single day. YOU ARE A NAZI
I think you have your knickers in a twist,I am no Nazi but you are a Zionist......so you were saying ???????
 
Islam spread by violence, the Caliphates were obtained through Jihad, you ignorant fool...

No. The initial Arab "conquests" were the result of a "unified" group of "opportunists" filling the power vacuum left by the result of a 26 year long war between the two "superpowers" of the age the Romano-Byzantines and the Sassanian Persians, that left both empires devastated. The Arabs fought no more than one or two decisive battles against the Byzantines, destroying their field armies and the cities and towns of Egypt and the Levant (Palestine and Syria) surrendered to them. There was no mass slaughter of civillians, no forced conversion, no expulsions, except of those Byzantine nobles who refused to convert; they were allowed to leave the area unharmed. No churches were destroyed or desecrated and the natives were allowed to administer themselves as they had before. The only differences were that they had to pay taxes to their conquerers. The tax could be avoided altogether if they converted to Islam and the Muslims even tried to stop mass conversions as they reduced their tax base. It took centuries for the region to convert to Islam, that's historical fact, not Islamophobic propaganda.

There's another book availble on the subject by the historian Tom Holland, In The Shadow Of The Sword - Tom Holland that postulates the idea that the overwhelming bulk of Arabs in the 7th century that took part in the conquests were not even Muslims. Islam becoming a "state" religion much later. This book caused a bit of a controversy in 2012 when a TV programme about it was shown on UK's Channel 4. TV historian Tom Holland triggers storm after calling Islam a made-up religion Daily Mail Online

What are you blaberring now? From the time Mohammad appeared on the scene, Islam spread through invasions and conquests. In India alone Islamic savages massacred over 90 million Hindus until they conquered it. And every nation Islam conquered, they forced the Arab religion, culture, and language down the people's throats at the point of the sword. Those who "converted willingly" knew what the consequences would be if they didn't.

Again, try reading some objective history, not Islamophobic propaganda. The only large scale massacres in India prior to the 1948 Partition, were perpertated by Timur-i-Lenk who was a Turko-Mongol warlord in the 14th century who used Islam more as a political tool to legitimise his rule, whereas his own religious beliefs remain a mystery. He's held responsible for depopulated vast areas of Asia and the Levant.

Islam spread as much through missionaries as did any other religion. The only people who claim 90million hindus were massacred by Muslims are those like Andrew Bostrom, who is not even a historian but an agenda driven Islamophobe, along with others like Daniel Pipes. Such accounts also tend to omit the Hindu massacres of Muslims.

If anyone is interested, here's a simplified but more objective account:
Muslim conquests on the Indian subcontinent - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Hold on the Mongol Empire was virtually over by 1260 and the Mongols were never Muslims,and their territory never extended into the Levant or India for that matter......are you sure that you don't mean the Mogauls sic who invaded India after the collapse of the Mongols and Ghengis Khan and his sons ???????steve

Actually the Mongols actually did invade the Middle East. They sacked Bagdad but were stopped by the Muslim Mameluks in the Galilee.
Well the Knights Templars were fighting Saladin during this period in this area,the KT's did request from the Great Khan that they help to defeat Saladin ...The Great Khan replied rightly "That the Mongol people never help Cannibals(which some KT's were) and therefore would not help"
 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.
 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
Later some did but after Ghengis Khans death...for you to read......and try to comprehend.....you will note the expanding map,showing that the Mongols not passing through the Levant (although they had the odd sortie) or Indiaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire
 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
!!
 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
Later some did but after Ghengis Khans death...for you to read......and try to comprehend.....you will note the expanding map,showing that the Mongols not passing through the Levant (although they had the odd sortie) or Indiaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

Never said they made it to the Levant.

Funny how any group of people that likes to invade, rape, loot and kill naturally gets attracted to Islam.

 
GUILTINESS.....AS ALWAYS...YOUR MANIC-MADNESS SHINING THROUGH YET AGAIN DISGUSTING TERROR MERCHANT OF NORTH LONDON




600 miles out old chap, keep trying. A clue I can see the North sea and the North Yorks moors from my house.

So it is you that is terror merchant of Oz as you will go to any extremes to defend islamonazi terrorism



Whass’ up Sherlock…..


Quite the Englishman, aren’t we ole’ bean? (and your bloke, steve he did say "whilst." )....


I can just see you…


whilst twirling your mustache, and snickering.


"600 miles out old chap, keep trying…."


"I can see the North sea…"


"...and the North Yorks moors...
from my house"




I have some favorite movies with a lot of English-speaking people in them:


Have you seen::


Rebecca (’40)

The Invisible Man (’33)

American Werewolf in London (’81)

Time Bandits (’81)

Dial ‘M’ For Murder (’54)

European Vacation (80’s)

A Hard Days Night (’64)

Help (’65)


Classics. Maybe ‘youse’ over there by the moors would like American Werewolf in London !


cheerio, lad….






We had enough with Dracula don't cha' know, and his coffin can still be seen in the ruins of Whitby Abbey

Proof, if any were needed that Phoney lives in his own little fantasy world. :rolleyes:





So now you are an expert on Whitby and Dracula

images


I have laid in Dracula`s grave at Whitby Abbey and had the 3 white resident ducks follow me around after feeding them. The ducks even followed me into a ...
You should be ashamed of yourself. Those poor little innocent ducks.
 
Last edited:
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
Later some did but after Ghengis Khans death...for you to read......and try to comprehend.....you will note the expanding map,showing that the Mongols not passing through the Levant (although they had the odd sortie) or Indiaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

Never said they made it to the Levant.

Funny how any group of people that likes to invade, rape, loot and kill naturally gets attracted to Islam.

Thanks Roudy for this info......as I said well after the death of Ghengis Khan and the zenith of the Mongol Empire,steve,infact during the rise of Genghis's Empire many peoples were untouched by the Mongols,mind you if you resisted then War was a fact.........people don't naturally get attacted to Islam,there would be social-economic reasons during this period for the remnants of the Empire to do so.I do know that the Assassins got into Ghenghis Khans inner most sanctum and did not succeed in killing him(where we now get the word Assassination)....for their trouble the Great Khan put out a edict to wipe the Assassins off the face of the earth....and did to a point.....some escaped to northern Syria and re-established themselves there,where their mastery of Assination of mainy religious leaders continued........today the titular leader of the Assassins is believe it or not the AGA KHAN,one of the worlds wealthiest men,(property,horse racing etc,.)...but again thanks for your information above....steve
 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
Later some did but after Ghengis Khans death...for you to read......and try to comprehend.....you will note the expanding map,showing that the Mongols not passing through the Levant (although they had the odd sortie) or Indiaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

Never said they made it to the Levant.

Funny how any group of people that likes to invade, rape, loot and kill naturally gets attracted to Islam.

Thanks Roudy for this info......as I said well after the death of Ghengis Khan and the zenith of the Mongol Empire,steve,infact during the rise of Genghis's Empire many peoples were untouched by the Mongols,mind you if you resisted then War was a fact.........people don't naturally get attacted to Islam,there would be social-economic reasons during this period for the remnants of the Empire to do so.I do know that the Assassins got into Ghenghis Khans inner most sanctum and did not succeed in killing him(where we now get the word Assassination)....for their trouble the Great Khan put out a edict to wipe the Assassins off the face of the earth....and did to a point.....some escaped to northern Syria and re-established themselves there,where their mastery of Assination of mainy religious leaders continued(under the influence of drugs and 30 virgins,this was the first time this type of persuasion was used to motivate)........today the titular leader of the Assassins is believe it or not the AGA KHAN,one of the worlds wealthiest men,(property,horse racing etc,.)...but again thanks for your information above....steve
.
 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
Later some did but after Ghengis Khans death...for you to read......and try to comprehend.....you will note the expanding map,showing that the Mongols not passing through the Levant (although they had the odd sortie) or Indiaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

Never said they made it to the Levant.

Funny how any group of people that likes to invade, rape, loot and kill naturally gets attracted to Islam.

Thanks Roudy for this info......as I said well after the death of Ghengis Khan and the zenith of the Mongol Empire,steve,infact during the rise of Genghis's Empire many peoples were untouched by the Mongols,mind you if you resisted then War was a fact.........people don't naturally get attacted to Islam,there would be social-economic reasons during this period for the remnants of the Empire to do so.I do know that the Assassins got into Ghenghis Khans inner most sanctum and did not succeed in killing him(where we now get the word Assassination)....for their trouble the Great Khan put out a edict to wipe the Assassins off the face of the earth....and did to a point.....some escaped to northern Syria and re-established themselves there,where their mastery of Assination of mainy religious leaders continued........today the titular leader of the Assassins is believe it or not the AGA KHAN,one of the worlds wealthiest men,(property,horse racing etc,.)...but again thanks for your information above....steve

The Mongols were very brutal and barbaric, yet efficient killers. Which is why they got attracted to Islam, the religion who's founder was a brutal merciless warrior. And that's exactly why Hitler liked Islam more than all other religions. He thought Christianity was for pussies, and a derivative of Judaism. Hitler envisioned a Nazi Islamic Germany that conquers the world, just like Mohammad did. However he thought that Arabs were too inferior of a race to carry out Mohammad's legacy.

Look it up.
 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
Later some did but after Ghengis Khans death...for you to read......and try to comprehend.....you will note the expanding map,showing that the Mongols not passing through the Levant (although they had the odd sortie) or Indiaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

Never said they made it to the Levant.

Funny how any group of people that likes to invade, rape, loot and kill naturally gets attracted to Islam.


Like I said, Hitler loved Islam even more than the savage Mongols...


The Fuhrer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race. This can be seen in the similarity of their religious rites. Both (Judaism and Christianity) have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end they will be destroyed. The Fuhrer is a convinced vegetarian on principle.

Goebbels Diaries, 29 December 1939

During a meeting with a delegation of distinguished Arab figures, Hitler learned of how Islam motivated the Umayyad Caliphate during the Islamic invasion of Gaul and was now convinced that "the world would be Mohammedan today" if the Arab regime had successfully taken France during the Battle of Tours,[228] while also suggesting to Speer that "ultimately not Arabs, but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."

In speeches, Hitler made apparently warm references towards Muslim culture such as: "The peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France".

According to Speer, Hitler stated in private, "The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?" Speer also stated that when he was discussing with Hitler events which might have occurred had Islam absorbed Europe:

Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."

— Albert Speer

Similarly, Hitler was transcribed as saying:


'Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers [...] then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world.

 
^^^^^^

Which is why the Mongols, like Hitler, had an admiration for Islam and eventually converted to it. It happens with any tribe that likes to invade, loot, behead, rape, and kill other people.
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
Later some did but after Ghengis Khans death...for you to read......and try to comprehend.....you will note the expanding map,showing that the Mongols not passing through the Levant (although they had the odd sortie) or Indiaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

Never said they made it to the Levant.

Funny how any group of people that likes to invade, rape, loot and kill naturally gets attracted to Islam.


Like I said, Hitler loved Islam even more than the savage Mongols...


The Fuhrer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race. This can be seen in the similarity of their religious rites. Both (Judaism and Christianity) have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end they will be destroyed. The Fuhrer is a convinced vegetarian on principle.

Goebbels Diaries, 29 December 1939

During a meeting with a delegation of distinguished Arab figures, Hitler learned of how Islam motivated the Umayyad Caliphate during the Islamic invasion of Gaul and was now convinced that "the world would be Mohammedan today" if the Arab regime had successfully taken France during the Battle of Tours,[228] while also suggesting to Speer that "ultimately not Arabs, but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."

In speeches, Hitler made apparently warm references towards Muslim culture such as: "The peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France".

According to Speer, Hitler stated in private, "The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?" Speer also stated that when he was discussing with Hitler events which might have occurred had Islam absorbed Europe:

Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."

— Albert Speer

Similarly, Hitler was transcribed as saying:


'Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers [...] then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world.
Hitler was quite MAD Roudy and he despised everyone,including Arabs.....what he did to Jews was to try(and thankfully fail)eliminate them,he detested the Russians/Slavs(where he slaughtered over 11 million) I think really whatever this Being thought should be consigned to the Dustbin of history where such thought(and actual practice) belong.

Hitler loved NO ONE including himself........he ended up being one of the most pathetic individuals in history........mind you most Germans loved him...God Knows How but they did.steve,keep up your good work on this interesting thread Roudy
 
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
Later some did but after Ghengis Khans death...for you to read......and try to comprehend.....you will note the expanding map,showing that the Mongols not passing through the Levant (although they had the odd sortie) or Indiaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

Never said they made it to the Levant.

Funny how any group of people that likes to invade, rape, loot and kill naturally gets attracted to Islam.


Like I said, Hitler loved Islam even more than the savage Mongols...


The Fuhrer is deeply religious, though completely anti-Christian. He views Christianity as a symptom of decay. Rightly so. It is a branch of the Jewish race. This can be seen in the similarity of their religious rites. Both (Judaism and Christianity) have no point of contact to the animal element, and thus, in the end they will be destroyed. The Fuhrer is a convinced vegetarian on principle.

Goebbels Diaries, 29 December 1939

During a meeting with a delegation of distinguished Arab figures, Hitler learned of how Islam motivated the Umayyad Caliphate during the Islamic invasion of Gaul and was now convinced that "the world would be Mohammedan today" if the Arab regime had successfully taken France during the Battle of Tours,[228] while also suggesting to Speer that "ultimately not Arabs, but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."

In speeches, Hitler made apparently warm references towards Muslim culture such as: "The peoples of Islam will always be closer to us than, for example, France".

According to Speer, Hitler stated in private, "The Mohammedan religion too would have been much more compatible to us than Christianity. Why did it have to be Christianity with its meekness and flabbiness?" Speer also stated that when he was discussing with Hitler events which might have occurred had Islam absorbed Europe:

Hitler said that the conquering Arabs, because of their racial inferiority, would in the long run have been unable to contend with the harsher climate and conditions of the country. They could not have kept down the more vigorous natives, so that ultimately not Arabs but Islamized Germans could have stood at the head of this Mohammedan Empire."

— Albert Speer

Similarly, Hitler was transcribed as saying:


'Had Charles Martel not been victorious at Poitiers [...] then we should in all probability have been converted to Mohammedanism, that cult which glorifies the heroism and which opens up the seventh Heaven to the bold warrior alone. Then the Germanic races would have conquered the world.
Hitler was quite MAD Roudy and he despised everyone,including Arabs.....what he did to Jews was to try(and thankfully fail)eliminate them,he detested the Russians/Slavs(where he slaughtered over 11 million) I think really whatever this Being thought should be consigned to the Dustbin of history where such thought(and actual practice) belong.

Hitler loved NO ONE including himself........he ended up being one of the most pathetic individuals in history........mind you most Germans loved him...God Knows How but they did.steve,keep up your good work on this interesting thread Roudy

I am glad that you understand why Islam is a cancer to modern humanity and freedom.
 
They NEVER converted...in fact compared to the rest of the known world the Mongols had complete Religious and Ethnic freedom in their Capital Koukoram sic and their empire and only promoted on Ability not Cronyism .............you are merely speaking from an ignorant Judo-Christian position and like your history of Jewish people is sadly lacking.

You need to look closer to home to see Barbarity and Terrorism.

They did look it up. Kangaroo brain
Later some did but after Ghengis Khans death...for you to read......and try to comprehend.....you will note the expanding map,showing that the Mongols not passing through the Levant (although they had the odd sortie) or Indiaen.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mongol_Empire

Never said they made it to the Levant.

Funny how any group of people that likes to invade, rape, loot and kill naturally gets attracted to Islam.

Thanks Roudy for this info......as I said well after the death of Ghengis Khan and the zenith of the Mongol Empire,steve,infact during the rise of Genghis's Empire many peoples were untouched by the Mongols,mind you if you resisted then War was a fact.........people don't naturally get attacted to Islam,there would be social-economic reasons during this period for the remnants of the Empire to do so.I do know that the Assassins got into Ghenghis Khans inner most sanctum and did not succeed in killing him(where we now get the word Assassination)....for their trouble the Great Khan put out a edict to wipe the Assassins off the face of the earth....and did to a point.....some escaped to northern Syria and re-established themselves there,where their mastery of Assination of mainy religious leaders continued........today the titular leader of the Assassins is believe it or not the AGA KHAN,one of the worlds wealthiest men,(property,horse racing etc,.)...but again thanks for your information above....steve

The Mongols were very brutal and barbaric, yet efficient killers. Which is why they got attracted to Islam, the religion who's founder was a brutal merciless warrior. And that's exactly why Hitler liked Islam more than all other religions. He thought Christianity was for pussies, and a derivative of Judaism. Hitler envisioned a Nazi Islamic Germany that conquers the world, just like Mohammad did. However he thought that Arabs were too inferior of a race to carry out Mohammad's legacy.

Look it up.
Roudy during the Genghis period Islam was so far from the mind of the Mongols they had a completely different belief and set of morality........later generations did convert,but at their zenith the Mongols had complete freedom of ideas and religion.........They invented the inverted Bow and their prowess at riding the horse that enabled them to shoot an arrow ten times faster than the original bow,riding forward or riding away gave them greater superiority against their foe.

The Christian press over the centuries have given them bad press.(of course they would)..but the Mongols invented much indeed.......and Islam had nothing to do with them,just the logistics of expanding such a vast Empire has much to be admired.......their postal system of speed and accuracy was never bettered until the invention of the aeroplane..................tbc...steve
 

Forum List

Back
Top