Tea Party Alaska Senate candidate Miller is only liked by about one third of the people turning out in the election for Senate in Alaska. You click on the polling firm adobe acrobat report to find that out. So the other two candidates split the vote, and one of them may have name recognition problems(?).
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...nate_miller_vs_mcadams_vs_murkowski-1700.html
It turns out the Democrat is actually liked by a giant majority of the state's likely voters, and the Republican candidate is genuinely disliked by a a giant majority of the state's likely voters.
And so the Democrat, thanks to the Tea Party and Governor Palin, actually has a chance where there aren't enough likely voters to even spell "Democrat," much less. . . ."What's-Her-Name!"
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("No!" in fact is actually a might big word at RNC! "Segregation Today, Segregation Tomorrow, and Segregation Forever!" is also a mighty big word at RNC, and Trent Lott isn't even campaigning, unlike Bill Clinton who is promising some sort of women's rights advocacy funding(?). . . .or something!)
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ep...nate_miller_vs_mcadams_vs_murkowski-1700.html
It turns out the Democrat is actually liked by a giant majority of the state's likely voters, and the Republican candidate is genuinely disliked by a a giant majority of the state's likely voters.
And so the Democrat, thanks to the Tea Party and Governor Palin, actually has a chance where there aren't enough likely voters to even spell "Democrat," much less. . . ."What's-Her-Name!"
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
("No!" in fact is actually a might big word at RNC! "Segregation Today, Segregation Tomorrow, and Segregation Forever!" is also a mighty big word at RNC, and Trent Lott isn't even campaigning, unlike Bill Clinton who is promising some sort of women's rights advocacy funding(?). . . .or something!)
Last edited: