Al Qaeda No. 2 in Video Calls Obama Dishonorable

lib⋅er⋅al
   /ˈlɪbərəl, ˈlɪbrəl/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [lib-er-uhl, lib-ruhl] Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. favorable to progress or reform, as in political or religious affairs.
2. (often initial capital letter) noting or pertaining to a political party advocating measures of progressive political reform.
3. of, pertaining to, based on, or advocating liberalism.
4. favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, esp. as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties.
5. favoring or permitting freedom of action, esp. with respect to matters of personal belief or expression: a liberal policy toward dissident artists and writers.
6. of or pertaining to representational forms of government rather than aristocracies and monarchies.
7. free from prejudice or bigotry; tolerant: a liberal attitude toward foreigners.
8. open-minded or tolerant, esp. free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc.
9. characterized by generosity and willingness to give in large amounts: a liberal donor.
10. given freely or abundantly; generous: a liberal donation.
11. not strict or rigorous; free; not literal: a liberal interpretation of a rule.
12. of, pertaining to, or based on the liberal arts.
13. of, pertaining to, or befitting a freeman.
–noun
14. a person of liberal principles or views, esp. in politics or religion.
15. (often initial capital letter) a member of a liberal party in politics, esp. of the Liberal party in Great Britain.

con⋅serv⋅a⋅tive
   /kənˈsɜrvətɪv/ Show Spelled Pronunciation [kuhn-sur-vuh-tiv] Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1. disposed to preserve existing conditions, institutions, etc., or to restore traditional ones, and to limit change.
2. cautiously moderate or purposefully low: a conservative estimate.
3. traditional in style or manner; avoiding novelty or showiness: conservative suit.
4. (often initial capital letter) of or pertaining to the Conservative party.
5. (initial capital letter) of, pertaining to, or characteristic of Conservative Jews or Conservative Judaism.
6. having the power or tendency to conserve; preservative.
7. Mathematics. (of a vector or vector function) having curl equal to zero; irrotational; lamellar.
–noun
8. a person who is conservative in principles, actions, habits, etc.
9. a supporter of conservative political policies.
10. (initial capital letter) a member of a conservative political party, esp. the Conservative party in Great Britain.
11. a preservative.

Okay....now that we've got that out of the way (some of you people throw words around without understanding their meaning, so I provided definitions).

Now.....think about this.....conservatives want things to stay the same, because they don't like change and are happy with the status-quo.

Liberals are always looking for ways to expand things and to advance the community and nation with improvements on current situations.

My question is...........

Why is being a bit of a liberal such a bad thing? You guys want to go back to living in wood shacks and no electricity, or are you grateful for the improvements to your life over the past 30 years or so with your computers, internet, cell phones, flat screen tv's and all that?

Me? I prefer progress.
 
Read Bank Terrorist..




I have already explained that twice on this very board.. It's here..


No one questioned your questioning a sitting President's actions, I question calling him a liar a chimp a war mongerer and whatever else you could dream up,,

Liar - Bush Jr. told us the economy was "fundamentally strong". We were told that we would "go get OBL, dead or alive". "Mission accomplished". How many more you want? "WMD's".

War Mongerer - Remember the rhetoric after 9/11? See above about "dead or alive", as well as look at the fact that we went into the WRONG FUCKING COUNTRY!

Chimp - Hey.....Bush can't do hardly anything without Cheney's approval. Therefore, he's Cheney's trained chimp.

Next?
 
Liar - Bush Jr. told us the economy was "fundamentally strong". We were told that we would "go get OBL, dead or alive". "Mission accomplished". How many more you want? "WMD's".

War Mongerer - Remember the rhetoric after 9/11? See above about "dead or alive", as well as look at the fact that we went into the WRONG FUCKING COUNTRY!

Chimp - Hey.....Bush can't do hardly anything without Cheney's approval. Therefore, he's Cheney's trained chimp.

Next?





good job, reach around!
 
Liar - Bush Jr. told us the economy was "fundamentally strong". We were told that we would "go get OBL, dead or alive". "Mission accomplished". How many more you want? "WMD's".

War Mongerer - Remember the rhetoric after 9/11? See above about "dead or alive", as well as look at the fact that we went into the WRONG FUCKING COUNTRY!

Chimp - Hey.....Bush can't do hardly anything without Cheney's approval. Therefore, he's Cheney's trained chimp.

Next?

And people in Congress still took him seriously after all you have said when he called for a $700 billion bailout. Just watch Bush's press conference calling Congress to act on the bailout. The funny part is that the party proclaiming change against Bush sided with him. The economy is still tanking. Nothing they're gonna do. It's sad to know that our change President is going to have $1 trillion in budget deficit for 2009 ($700b he voted for).
 
Last edited:
I agree, something that has been noticeably and sorely lacking in the past eight years.. If the liberals had fought as hard against the terrorists as they did against GWB it would be a done deal. such ferocity they have against Sarah but none for terrorists.. wowser

Bullshit. Pure and simple. Bush pushed his own agenda for 8 years and it's the liberals' fault because we didn't agree with what he did. If he had fought against the terrorists instead of against Democrats, we would have won this fucking war.
 
Bullshit. Pure and simple. Bush pushed his own agenda for 8 years and it's the liberals' fault because we didn't agree with what he did. If he had fought against the terrorists instead of against Democrats, we would have won this fucking war.





you got all that bassackwards.. yep,, I believe ya do!
 
Really? Explain again why we invaded the wrong f-ing country?





I'm not convinced it was the wrong country.. Based on the available evidence and intelligence gathered from around the world bla bla bla bla
 
CAIRO, Egypt — Al Qaeda No. 2 Ayman al-Zawahiri insulted Barack Obama in the terror group's first reaction to his election, calling him a demeaning racial term implying that the president-elect is a black American who does the bidding of whites.

The message appeared chiefly aimed at persuading Muslims and Arabs that Obama does not represent a change in U.S. policies. Al-Zawahiri said in the message, which appeared on militant Web sites Wednesday, that Obama is "the direct opposite of honorable black Americans" like Malcolm X, the 1960s African-American rights leader.

Al-Zawahiri also called Obama — along with secretaries of state Colin Powell and Condoleezza Rice — "house negroes."

Why are so many people parroting propaganda that the lying "old media" has put forth? It's simply amazing that anyone in their right minds would believe some bogus picture of some guy they tell us is the number#2 man in so-called Al Qaeda speaking the way An American would speak.

It's doubtful the Arabs they speak of even know the meaning of "house negroes" in the American context, or who Malcolm X was. Any amateur video producer could put together a video such as this to ferment ill will and help the Israelis start another war. They are ones that benefit from all the wars. These international Israeli bankers get rich off war.

It's another big lie, just like the yellow cake uranium, the weapons of mass destruction, we don't spy on Americans, They will greet us as liberators, they don't know about jets spraying clouds of harmful pollution over American cities, Fluoride in the water supply is good for children and teeth, the twin towers imploded without explosives being planted before hand, WTC building 7 imploded due to fire, and the list of lies by the NWO Communist go on and on.

The Israelis are the ones destroying the economy, looting the treasury, and financing terror (9-11) to take away our rights and freedoms along with the Constitution. Greenspan raised the interest/Usury rate 10 times in 1 year before he retired to bring about this economic collapse. They are responsible for the problems we are experiencing in our economy.

Why is some Zionist over the so-called Department of homeland security anyway?

They use the media they control to induce a variety problems that they alone benefit from.

They brought Communism to Russia.

The enemy within must be recognized.
 
Last edited:

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top