Airforce considered "Gay Bomb" against enemies

Discussion in 'Military' started by SolarEnergy1, Jun 12, 2007.

  1. SolarEnergy1
    Offline

    SolarEnergy1 Member

    Joined:
    May 18, 2007
    Messages:
    305
    Thanks Received:
    25
    Trophy Points:
    16
    Ratings:
    +25
    Liberals would love this. I hear they tested this in San Francisco already:lol:

    Air Force Considered Gay 'Love Bomb' Against Enemies

    Tuesday, June 12, 2007


    WASHINGTON — The Air Force on Tuesday confirmed a report that in 1994 a military researcher requested $7.5 million to develop a non-lethal "love bomb" that would chemically alter the state of mind of enemy troops and make them want to have sex with each other rather than fight.

    Air Force spokeswoman Lt. Col. Cathy Reardon said the idea was proposed by an Air Force researcher at a lab at Brooks Air Force Base in Texas, but it was rejected by the Defense Department. Officials noted that the Air Force constantly is considering funding proposals.

    No money was spent, Reardon said, and no such weapons are being considered. The goal was to create a non-lethal weapon to be used against enemy troops.

    First reported by KPIX-TV in San Francisco, the discovery of the "gay bomb" proposal came from a Freedom of Information Act request made by Edward Hammond of Berkeley's Sunshine Project, a watchdog group that tracks military spending.

    Click here to go to the Sunshine Project Web site.

    As part of the military's goal of developing non-lethal weapons, the proposal suggested, "One distasteful but completely non-lethal example would be strong aphrodisiacs, especially if the chemical also caused homosexual behavior."


    The proposal also offered other ideas, such as a "sex attractant" chemical that would make "annoying and injurious creatures" like stinging bugs more aggressive and draw them to the enemy's position. Another chemical would leave such a strong stench, the enemy would be detectable for weeks.

    A portion of the proposal notes that some of the chemicals could be used on both enemy personnel and civilians and would require decontamination countermeasures to nullify the effects.

    A Defense Department spokesman told FOX News that he was not aware of any "love bomb" proposal but called the idea one of the most ridiculous things he'd heard.

    FOX News' Jennifer Griffin and Nick Simeone contributed to this report.

    foxnews dot com/story/0,2933,281217,00.html
     
  2. William Joyce
    Offline

    William Joyce Chemotherapy for PC

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2004
    Messages:
    9,693
    Thanks Received:
    1,135
    Trophy Points:
    190
    Location:
    Caucasiastan
    Ratings:
    +1,349
    I think more effective still would just be a "liberal bomb." Drop it on your enemies and they all melt into balls of peaceful, equal, rainbow-colored mush.
     

Share This Page