AGW Believer AND Skeptic!!!

Discussion in 'Environment' started by konradv, Mar 29, 2010.

  1. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,673
    Penn State Global Warming Researcher Calls Self 'Skeptic'

    Associated Press 03/28/2010 Pa. global warming researcher calls self 'skeptic' - Lebanon Daily News

    ALLENTOWN, Pa.—A Penn State University climate scientist says he regrets that he did not immediately object when a colleague suggested deleting e-mails on global warming.
    Meteorology professor Michael Mann told an Allentown newspaper that he answered the May 2008 e-mail from Phil Jones by saying he would contact another scientist. He says he did not say he would do any such thing or show any approval of the idea, but he now wishes he had gone farther. "I wish in retrospect I had told him, 'Hey, you shouldn't even be thinking about this,'" Mann told The Morning Call for a story Sunday. "I didn't think it was an appropriate request."

    please review the rules for copyright compliance-del
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Mar 29, 2010
  2. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    he regrets getting caught.
     
  3. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,673
    Caught doing what?
     
  4. Midnight Marauder
    Offline

    Midnight Marauder BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    12,404
    Thanks Received:
    1,876
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1,876
    I particularly enjoyed this part:

    Pot? Meet kettle! Skeptics aren't "one sided" son, I'll explain.

    We WANT this research done! We WANT answers on if mankind's activities are affecting the climate. We DON'T want data bent, twisted and molded to fit an agenda and a predetermined outcome. We understand that REAL science starts with "I do not know" and proceeds from there.

    AGW "science" starts with "we DO know" and then tries to build a fake case.

    This rhetoric of "deniers" is an attempt to marginalize, to compare skeptics to holocaust deniers. How is that part of science?

    How it hiding the data part of science, stonewalling FOIA requests? Hiding the decline, all that rot?

    Which part of science do you not understand?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  5. gslack
    Offline

    gslack Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    4,527
    Thanks Received:
    346
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +346
    Agreed.... Mann the name sounds familiar.... Oh yeah the hockey stick graph!:eusa_liar:


    HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!
     
  6. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    22,571
    Thanks Received:
    2,558
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +5,673
    How it hiding the data part of science, stonewalling FOIA requests? Hiding the decline, all that rot?
    ------------------------------

    How is it part? It's a VERY IMPORTANT part. How can you tell if humans are having an effect, if you don't "hide" data from other sources? I guess it's the word. I would have preferred they used the term "subtracted out". That isn't an example of fraud, but everyday scientific practice. If the sun cycle is going through a cooling phase, you'd have to "hide the decline" in order to see what's left, presumably the effect of man, barring other possibilities.
     
  7. Midnight Marauder
    Offline

    Midnight Marauder BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    12,404
    Thanks Received:
    1,876
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1,876
    :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

    What an imbecile and fraud apologist.
     
  8. gslack
    Offline

    gslack Senior Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2010
    Messages:
    4,527
    Thanks Received:
    346
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Ratings:
    +346
    WTH????

    That is not scientific at all. You are showing a study designed to produce a predetermined outcome. That is not a scientific process. LOL, please give us more science lessons... This is too funny...:lol:
     
  9. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,617
    How do you know that, MM?

    ARe you qualified to understand the science behind this debate?

    I ask this because I KNOW I am not qualifed to judge who is being truthful or who is right, either.

    How do you know these things with such certainty?
     
  10. del
    Offline

    del BANNED

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2008
    Messages:
    45,052
    Thanks Received:
    9,830
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +9,885
    deleting emails to strengthen his case.
     

Share This Page