Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Boy, you nailed me! She ONLY gets $120k a year for breaking the law!Oh. My. God.Are you kidding? Government jobs do.that is not how it works, nobody gets their full salary when they retire.
Lerner's Pension Could Be as Much as $102,600/Year, $3.96 Million Lifetime
And her salary was 177,000, so she is not getting her full salary like you said. just admit you are wrong and move on. it is ok. Dont be a Trump
I know right, if people would only be accurate and honest with their post and not lie in them, then we could actually get to the heart of the matter. Why not give that a try next time.
So now you make fun of my Lyxdexia!Boy, you nailed me! She ONLY gets $120k a year for breaking the law!Oh. My. God.Are you kidding? Government jobs do.
Lerner's Pension Could Be as Much as $102,600/Year, $3.96 Million Lifetime
And her salary was 177,000, so she is not getting her full salary like you said. just admit you are wrong and move on. it is ok. Dont be a Trump
I know right, if people would only be accurate and honest with their post and not lie in them, then we could actually get to the heart of the matter. Why not give that a try next time.
Actually, it is 102k. you are not a very bright person are you?
It would be much easier to discuss what should happen to her if we could get past the false information.
But I can see why you are such a fan of Trump
So now you make fun of my Lyxdexia!Boy, you nailed me! She ONLY gets $120k a year for breaking the law!Oh. My. God.And her salary was 177,000, so she is not getting her full salary like you said. just admit you are wrong and move on. it is ok. Dont be a Trump
I know right, if people would only be accurate and honest with their post and not lie in them, then we could actually get to the heart of the matter. Why not give that a try next time.
Actually, it is 102k. you are not a very bright person are you?
It would be much easier to discuss what should happen to her if we could get past the false information.
But I can see why you are such a fan of Trump
What else are you going to tell us why criminals should be paid over 3 million tax payer dollars?
“used her position to improperly influence IRS action against conservative organizations, denying these groups due process and equal protection rights under the law”She broke the law. There is no denying that.
Specifically, what law did she break?
I know that flies over your head, so replace “conservative” with “black” and it will make sense.
Then you’ll have no problem with Trump using the IRS as a political weapon.“used her position to improperly influence IRS action against conservative organizations, denying these groups due process and equal protection rights under the law”She broke the law. There is no denying that.
Specifically, what law did she break?
I know that flies over your head, so replace “conservative” with “black” and it will make sense.
Poor judgement in using politically sounding names as a criteria for selecting which applications were chosen for verification is not a crime.
"Proof that an IRS employee acted in good faith would be a complete defense to a criminal charge; and proof that an IRS employee acted because of mistake, bad judgment, ignorance, inertia, or even negligence would be insufficient to support a criminal charge."
No Orange Jumpsuit For Lois Lerner
"Throughout the investigation, not a single IRS employee reported any allegation, concern, or suspicion that the handling of tax-exempt applications-or any other IRS function was motivated by political bias, discriminatory intent, or corruption. Among these witnesses were several IRS employees who were critical of Ms. Lerner's and other officials' leadership, as well as others who volunteered to us that they are politically conservative. Moreover, both TIGTA and the IRS's Whistleblower Office confirmed that neither has received internal complaints from IRS employees alleging that officials' handling of tax-exempt applications was motivated by political or other discriminatory bias."
Dufus thinks those teams of lawyers who worked years on this get paid nothing.And you and I pay the bill
"The proposed settlement, which provides no monetary relief, includes an acknowledgment by the IRS that its treatment of the applicants was "wrong."
"For such treatment, the IRS expresses its sincere apology,'' the court documents state.
The deal, subject to court approval, also calls on each party to the litigation to "bear its respective fees and costs."
What bill?
Now, call on Lois to be put in Jail........
And you and I pay the bill and no one even gets a reprimand at the IRS.
“It is improper for the IRS to single out groups for different treatment based on their names or ideological positions.” Like somebody from the IRS cut a fart in public and they are really really sorry about that now.
Justice Department settles IRS lawsuits from 400 conservative groups claiming discrimination
So the war in Iraq cost nothing?Dufus thinks those teams of lawyers who worked years on this get paid nothing.And you and I pay the bill
"The proposed settlement, which provides no monetary relief, includes an acknowledgment by the IRS that its treatment of the applicants was "wrong."
"For such treatment, the IRS expresses its sincere apology,'' the court documents state.
The deal, subject to court approval, also calls on each party to the litigation to "bear its respective fees and costs."
What bill?
Now, call on Lois to be put in Jail........
Doesn't the government have lawyers on staff who do this kind of work? You think they hired out for the job?
Then you’ll have no problem with Trump using the IRS as a political weapon.“used her position to improperly influence IRS action against conservative organizations, denying these groups due process and equal protection rights under the law”She broke the law. There is no denying that.
Specifically, what law did she break?
I know that flies over your head, so replace “conservative” with “black” and it will make sense.
Poor judgement in using politically sounding names as a criteria for selecting which applications were chosen for verification is not a crime.
"Proof that an IRS employee acted in good faith would be a complete defense to a criminal charge; and proof that an IRS employee acted because of mistake, bad judgment, ignorance, inertia, or even negligence would be insufficient to support a criminal charge."
No Orange Jumpsuit For Lois Lerner
"Throughout the investigation, not a single IRS employee reported any allegation, concern, or suspicion that the handling of tax-exempt applications-or any other IRS function was motivated by political bias, discriminatory intent, or corruption. Among these witnesses were several IRS employees who were critical of Ms. Lerner's and other officials' leadership, as well as others who volunteered to us that they are politically conservative. Moreover, both TIGTA and the IRS's Whistleblower Office confirmed that neither has received internal complaints from IRS employees alleging that officials' handling of tax-exempt applications was motivated by political or other discriminatory bias."
Why would a President direct the IRS to be a political weapon?Then you’ll have no problem with Trump using the IRS as a political weapon.“used her position to improperly influence IRS action against conservative organizations, denying these groups due process and equal protection rights under the law”She broke the law. There is no denying that.
Specifically, what law did she break?
I know that flies over your head, so replace “conservative” with “black” and it will make sense.
Poor judgement in using politically sounding names as a criteria for selecting which applications were chosen for verification is not a crime.
"Proof that an IRS employee acted in good faith would be a complete defense to a criminal charge; and proof that an IRS employee acted because of mistake, bad judgment, ignorance, inertia, or even negligence would be insufficient to support a criminal charge."
No Orange Jumpsuit For Lois Lerner
"Throughout the investigation, not a single IRS employee reported any allegation, concern, or suspicion that the handling of tax-exempt applications-or any other IRS function was motivated by political bias, discriminatory intent, or corruption. Among these witnesses were several IRS employees who were critical of Ms. Lerner's and other officials' leadership, as well as others who volunteered to us that they are politically conservative. Moreover, both TIGTA and the IRS's Whistleblower Office confirmed that neither has received internal complaints from IRS employees alleging that officials' handling of tax-exempt applications was motivated by political or other discriminatory bias."
Are you saying President Obama somehow directed the misguided selection criteria Ms. Lerner used?
It's not odd at all. It's a competely transparent political move on the part of the Trump administration.Well...yeah, because it was never a true story to begin with.Let’s take a trip down memory lane. Do you remember Lois Lerner? BOLO? IRS audits of tea party organizations?
Sure you do. Back in 2013 Republicans were on the warpath over this. The IRS had identified dozens, maybe hundreds, of tea party organizations for extreme audits becasue of their political leanings...
After Four Years, IRS Finally Confirms There Was No Targeting of Tea Party Groups – Mother Jones
Only in far rightwing conservative precincts was this even a thing, they were lying from the start.
This is how insidious fake news is.
Odd to settle completely frivolous lawsuits....
Let’s take a trip down memory lane. Do you remember Lois Lerner? BOLO? IRS audits of tea party organizations?
Sure you do. Back in 2013 Republicans were on the warpath over this. The IRS had identified dozens, maybe hundreds, of tea party organizations for extreme audits becasue of their political leanings...
After Four Years, IRS Finally Confirms There Was No Targeting of Tea Party Groups – Mother Jones
Politics, of course.Let’s take a trip down memory lane. Do you remember Lois Lerner? BOLO? IRS audits of tea party organizations?
Sure you do. Back in 2013 Republicans were on the warpath over this. The IRS had identified dozens, maybe hundreds, of tea party organizations for extreme audits becasue of their political leanings...
After Four Years, IRS Finally Confirms There Was No Targeting of Tea Party Groups – Mother Jones
So if there was no targeting of Tea Party groups, why did they apologized just today for discrimination and settled to pay hundreds of those groups?
US agrees to pay tea party groups in suits over IRS scrutiny
Tea Party groups settle lawsuit against IRS; agency apologizes for discrimination during Obama's presidency
Attorney General Jeff Sessions said the IRS owed the groups an apology after years of poor treatment and even longer refusal to concede bad behavior. He placed blame on “the last administration,” saying the targeting that went on under President Obama “was wrong and should never have occurred.”
After 40 years, Charles Manson has confirmed that he did not commit the crimes he was accused of committing. Well. That settles it.
Well, the actual audit in the IRS case settles it.
Your reply also settles the fact you have any intellectual capacity.
And Manson is still guilty of the crimes he committed.
Consider this settled now.
You settle when you are wrong. You fight when you are right...especially when you have the US treasury financing your defense.
Are you serious? The IRS versus Tupelo Mississippi Patriots Non Profit?
Who has the better access to legal defense?
The IRS settled because they were breaking the law. It's not tough to figure out,
Let’s take a trip down memory lane. Do you remember Lois Lerner? BOLO? IRS audits of tea party organizations?
Sure you do. Back in 2013 Republicans were on the warpath over this. The IRS had identified dozens, maybe hundreds, of tea party organizations for extreme audits becasue of their political leanings...
After Four Years, IRS Finally Confirms There Was No Targeting of Tea Party Groups – Mother Jones
More lies from the liars.Let’s take a trip down memory lane. Do you remember Lois Lerner? BOLO? IRS audits of tea party organizations?
Sure you do. Back in 2013 Republicans were on the warpath over this. The IRS had identified dozens, maybe hundreds, of tea party organizations for extreme audits becasue of their political leanings...
After Four Years, IRS Finally Confirms There Was No Targeting of Tea Party Groups – Mother Jones
