Adverse Inference

[IM2]

Adverse Inference is why we can say that trump is guilty and should be removed from office. There is no excuse for the obstruction by trump.

The adverse inference is based upon the presumption that the party who controls the evidence would have produced it, if it had been supportive. Adverse inference can also apply to a witness known to exist but the party refuses to identify or produce.

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

According to Lawvibe, "the 'adverse inference' can be quite damning at trial. Essentially, when plaintiffs try to present evidence on a point essential to their case and can't because the document has been destroyed (by the defendant), the jury can infer that the evidence would have been adverse to (the defendant), and adopt the plaintiff’s reasonable interpretation of what the document would have said...."

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

An adverse inference generally is a legal inference, adverse to the concerned party, made from a party's silence or the absence of requested evidence. For example, as a sanction for spoliation of evidence, a court may instruct the jury it could draw an inference that the evidence contained in the destroyed documents would have been unfavorable.

Adverse Inference Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

 

[MAGAman]

Nope.

This is America.

 

[Thinker101]

Adverse Inference is why we can say that trump is guilty and should be removed from office. There is no excuse for the obstruction by trump.

The adverse inference is based upon the presumption that the party who controls the evidence would have produced it, if it had been supportive. Adverse inference can also apply to a witness known to exist but the party refuses to identify or produce.

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

According to Lawvibe, "the 'adverse inference' can be quite damning at trial. Essentially, when plaintiffs try to present evidence on a point essential to their case and can't because the document has been destroyed (by the defendant), the jury can infer that the evidence would have been adverse to (the defendant), and adopt the plaintiff’s reasonable interpretation of what the document would have said...."

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

An adverse inference generally is a legal inference, adverse to the concerned party, made from a party's silence or the absence of requested evidence. For example, as a sanction for spoliation of evidence, a court may instruct the jury it could draw an inference that the evidence contained in the destroyed documents would have been unfavorable.

Adverse Inference Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

You may want to look up some of them big words before trying to spin them.

 

[BlindBoo]

Trumpublicans in Congress march in lock step and anyone breaking ranks is exiled from the cult.

The public is not quite as bad.

 

[IM2]

Nope.

This is America.

Adverse Inference is American law.

 

[IM2]

Adverse Inference is why we can say that trump is guilty and should be removed from office. There is no excuse for the obstruction by trump.

The adverse inference is based upon the presumption that the party who controls the evidence would have produced it, if it had been supportive. Adverse inference can also apply to a witness known to exist but the party refuses to identify or produce.

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

According to Lawvibe, "the 'adverse inference' can be quite damning at trial. Essentially, when plaintiffs try to present evidence on a point essential to their case and can't because the document has been destroyed (by the defendant), the jury can infer that the evidence would have been adverse to (the defendant), and adopt the plaintiff’s reasonable interpretation of what the document would have said...."

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

An adverse inference generally is a legal inference, adverse to the concerned party, made from a party's silence or the absence of requested evidence. For example, as a sanction for spoliation of evidence, a court may instruct the jury it could draw an inference that the evidence contained in the destroyed documents would have been unfavorable.

Adverse Inference Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

You may want to look up some of them big words before trying to spin them.

Nah, there's no need for that. Your ignorant ass just needs to recognize legal principles.

 

[eagle1462010]

Jesus.........the left is pulling more .......out of their asses again.......

Can't even make up their minds on what to actually charge him with....

Yeah.....you got him this time......LOL

See you at the next election where you LOSE AGAIN.

 

[Tijn Von Ingersleben]

So the truth lay in the gaps? The fact that there is no evidence is somehow 'proof' that the evidence has been destroyed or hidden?
So...it may be inferred that there was, in fact evidence which would prove guilt?

Am I inferring correctly?

If so...I would like this board to know that Tyrone here stole 10 million USD from me. Of course I have no proof...but this ****** is a thief. Believe me...

 

[JGalt]

"Someone alert CNN! Some jailhouse lawyer on an internet discussion board thinks he finally has a way to unseat President Trump once and fer all. Dis gonna be good!!!!!"

 

[MAGAman]

Nah, there's no need for that. Your ignorant ass just needs to recognize legal principles.

Innocent until proven guilty is the foundational legal principle, Einstien.

And not only is Trump not proven guilty, you don't h as ve as single piece of evidence to infer guilt.

Your goalpost moving shows you know you've got nothing.

Instead of grasping at straws, a smart person would just admit he was wrong and move on

 

[MAGAman]

Nope.

This is America.

Adverse Inference is American law.

Nope.

 

[BlindBoo]

Innocent until proven guilty is the foundational legal principle, Einstien.

That line coming from Trumpublican Central is hilarious.

"Lock xxx Up"
"Lock xxx Up"
"Lock xxx Up"

 

[Billy_Bob]

My Gawd the liberals are gone, totally fucking nuts.... Now the lack of evidence is evidence... WTF are you fucking idiots smoking?

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Adverse Inference is why we can say that trump is guilty and should be removed from office. There is no excuse for the obstruction by trump.

The adverse inference is based upon the presumption that the party who controls the evidence would have produced it, if it had been supportive. Adverse inference can also apply to a witness known to exist but the party refuses to identify or produce.

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

According to Lawvibe, "the 'adverse inference' can be quite damning at trial. Essentially, when plaintiffs try to present evidence on a point essential to their case and can't because the document has been destroyed (by the defendant), the jury can infer that the evidence would have been adverse to (the defendant), and adopt the plaintiff’s reasonable interpretation of what the document would have said...."

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

An adverse inference generally is a legal inference, adverse to the concerned party, made from a party's silence or the absence of requested evidence. For example, as a sanction for spoliation of evidence, a court may instruct the jury it could draw an inference that the evidence contained in the destroyed documents would have been unfavorable.

Adverse Inference Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

Adam Shitt lied to the people of the US, but was behind a microphone in Congress, which allows him to be above the law, why the fuck should we listen to him or you even, when you support the lying sack of shit?

 

[Crepitus]

Nope.

This is America.

That is a legal definition in America.

 

[Crepitus]

Adverse Inference is why we can say that trump is guilty and should be removed from office. There is no excuse for the obstruction by trump.

The adverse inference is based upon the presumption that the party who controls the evidence would have produced it, if it had been supportive. Adverse inference can also apply to a witness known to exist but the party refuses to identify or produce.

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

According to Lawvibe, "the 'adverse inference' can be quite damning at trial. Essentially, when plaintiffs try to present evidence on a point essential to their case and can't because the document has been destroyed (by the defendant), the jury can infer that the evidence would have been adverse to (the defendant), and adopt the plaintiff’s reasonable interpretation of what the document would have said...."

Adverse inference - Wikipedia

An adverse inference generally is a legal inference, adverse to the concerned party, made from a party's silence or the absence of requested evidence. For example, as a sanction for spoliation of evidence, a court may instruct the jury it could draw an inference that the evidence contained in the destroyed documents would have been unfavorable.

Adverse Inference Law and Legal Definition | USLegal, Inc.

Adam Shitt lied to the people of the US, but was behind a microphone in Congress, which allows him to be above the law, why the fuck should we listen to him or you even, when you support the lying sack of shit?

When?

 

[MAGAman]

Guilt by inference....

Hahahaha

 

[007]

So... sitting around dreaming up the newest retarded incarnation of IMPEACHMENT EVIDENCE now appears to be SPORT for the unhinged democrats. It's like a CONTEST.

So Bill, got anything new?
No, Joe, I couldn't come up with anything, but I hear Sam down at the local Union office came up with something.
Oh really, well good for Sam, WE GOT HIM NOW.

 

[IM2]

Nah, there's no need for that. Your ignorant ass just needs to recognize legal principles.

Innocent until proven guilty is the foundational legal principle, Einstien.

And not only is Trump not proven guilty, you don't h as ve as single piece of evidence to infer guilt.

Your goalpost moving shows you know you've got nothing.

Instead of grasping at straws, a smart person would just admit he was wrong and move on

Adverse Inference is an American foundational legal principle. You don't get to deny the courts evidence and testimony then claim innocence because the court couldn't find guilt. And since impeachment is not a criminal procedure... However there is plenty of evidence that shows trumps guilt. The goalposts have not been moved. You're just a cult worshipper.

 

[IM2]

Guilt by inference....

Hahahaha

Nope that's not what adverse inference means dumb ass.