ADP Report Calls Stimulus Outcome: 18 Months Of Jobs Gains

mascale

Gold Member
Feb 22, 2009
6,836
800
130
So what became of the on-going Stimulus program after all? In the private sector, 18 months of steady job gains! Those are all Democratic Party created gains. The Republicans virtually universally said, "No!" to any further job gains!

ADP Employment Report

The Party of Abraham Lincoln even famously, took away Santa Clause, the Schedule M in the U. S. Internal Revenue Code. That was the "Make Work Pay," refundable tax credit.

The Republican Party was created at about the same time as Simon Legree: And it shows. Their newly elected, Party of Herbert Hoover state and local people: Are taking even new state and local government jobs away!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Party of Lincoln Treat Santa Clause to A Liberian Movement kind of status!)
 
So what became of the on-going Stimulus program after all? In the private sector, 18 months of steady job gains! Those are all Democratic Party created gains. The Republicans virtually universally said, "No!" to any further job gains!

ADP Employment Report

The Party of Abraham Lincoln even famously, took away Santa Clause, the Schedule M in the U. S. Internal Revenue Code. That was the "Make Work Pay," refundable tax credit.

The Republican Party was created at about the same time as Simon Legree: And it shows. Their newly elected, Party of Herbert Hoover state and local people: Are taking even new state and local government jobs away!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Party of Lincoln Treat Santa Clause to A Liberian Movement kind of status!)
Source? I do not believe there have been 18 months of job increases. Obamaturd is a failure and your are delusional.
 
So what became of the on-going Stimulus program after all? In the private sector, 18 months of steady job gains! Those are all Democratic Party created gains. The Republicans virtually universally said, "No!" to any further job gains!

ADP Employment Report

The Party of Abraham Lincoln even famously, took away Santa Clause, the Schedule M in the U. S. Internal Revenue Code. That was the "Make Work Pay," refundable tax credit.

The Republican Party was created at about the same time as Simon Legree: And it shows. Their newly elected, Party of Herbert Hoover state and local people: Are taking even new state and local government jobs away!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Party of Lincoln Treat Santa Clause to A Liberian Movement kind of status!)
Source? I do not believe there have been 18 months of job increases. Obamaturd is a failure and your are delusional.

LOL. And it begins.

ADP is the source. :eusa_eh:
 
So what became of the on-going Stimulus program after all? In the private sector, 18 months of steady job gains! Those are all Democratic Party created gains. The Republicans virtually universally said, "No!" to any further job gains!

ADP Employment Report

The Party of Abraham Lincoln even famously, took away Santa Clause, the Schedule M in the U. S. Internal Revenue Code. That was the "Make Work Pay," refundable tax credit.

The Republican Party was created at about the same time as Simon Legree: And it shows. Their newly elected, Party of Herbert Hoover state and local people: Are taking even new state and local government jobs away!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Party of Lincoln Treat Santa Clause to A Liberian Movement kind of status!)

you should read the actual reports instead of basing your post on the summary.

BTW, you are severly misleading by saying 'steady jobs gains', when your own source called it simply 'employment gains'. Steady certainly does not apply if you read the actual report.

EDIT: also, the press release specifies that the '18 months of empolyment gains' was for the service-providing sector only...
employment in the service-providing sector rose by 130,000 in June, nearly three times faster than in May, marking 18 consecutive months of employment gains.
...not overall employment.
 
Last edited:
Martin Crutsinger, Associated Press, 7/6/2011, reporting on the ISM release:

"The U.S. service sector, which employs nearly 90 percent of the country's work force, expanded for a 19th consecutive month in June. But growth slowed from May, a sign that the economy remains sluggish."

Some sources count even better than other sources: And Kosher does happen, even with two sets of data.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Reports are that the Original Tea Party dressed up like a bunch of naked savages. Anyone has to wonder just what it was they were thinking, or what they thought they were doing. . .or what they were on!)
 
Last edited:
Martin Crutsinger, Associated Press, 7/6/2011, reporting on the ISM release:

"The U.S. service sector, which employs nearly 90 percent of the country's work force, expanded for a 19th consecutive month in June. But growth slowed from May, a sign that the economy remains sluggish."

Some sources count even better than other sources: And Kosher does happen, even with two sets of data.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Reports are that the Original Tea Party dressed up like a bunch of naked savages. Anyone has to wonder just what it was they were thinking, or what they thought they were doing. . .or what they were on!)

thus proving exactly what I said... the gains were in 1 sector, not overall employment as the OP tried to state.
 
ADP stands for All Democratic Party. They are just a tool of Soros and the progressives. Remember the reports they were putting out at about this point in the Bush administration?

Tools of the left, thru and thru.
 
Martin Crutsinger, Associated Press, 7/6/2011, reporting on the ISM release:

"The U.S. service sector, which employs nearly 90 percent of the country's work force, expanded for a 19th consecutive month in June. But growth slowed from May, a sign that the economy remains sluggish."

Some sources count even better than other sources: And Kosher does happen, even with two sets of data.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Reports are that the Original Tea Party dressed up like a bunch of naked savages. Anyone has to wonder just what it was they were thinking, or what they thought they were doing. . .or what they were on!)

thus proving exactly what I said... the gains were in 1 sector, not overall employment as the OP tried to state.

Private sector employment has been increasing since March of 2010.
 
The payrolls report for June and July will likely show the alternative to the Obama Stimulus, jobs increases. State and Local government employment--teachers, fire and other first responders, will be unemployed: Created by the Party of Herbert Hoover!

Conservative poster, by contrast, tried to make it look like OP had called the Santa Monica Bay, in CA, the entire Pacific Ocean. OP didn't even call the entire Pacific Ocean, the Santa Monica Bay, in CA.

The Pacific Ocean is large and inclusive. The Service Sector is large and inclusive.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Any sensible Tea Party would actually have known what the oceans were really for!)
 
So what became of the on-going Stimulus program after all? In the private sector, 18 months of steady job gains! Those are all Democratic Party created gains. The Republicans virtually universally said, "No!" to any further job gains!

ADP Employment Report

The Party of Abraham Lincoln even famously, took away Santa Clause, the Schedule M in the U. S. Internal Revenue Code. That was the "Make Work Pay," refundable tax credit.

The Republican Party was created at about the same time as Simon Legree: And it shows. Their newly elected, Party of Herbert Hoover state and local people: Are taking even new state and local government jobs away!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Party of Lincoln Treat Santa Clause to A Liberian Movement kind of status!)


18 months of job gains is bad news for the GOP.

They are doing their best to ruin the economy.

They must be stopped.
 
The payrolls report for June and July will likely show the alternative to the Obama Stimulus, jobs increases. State and Local government employment--teachers, fire and other first responders, will be unemployed: Created by the Party of Herbert Hoover!

Conservative poster, by contrast, tried to make it look like OP had called the Santa Monica Bay, in CA, the entire Pacific Ocean. OP didn't even call the entire Pacific Ocean, the Santa Monica Bay, in CA.

The Pacific Ocean is large and inclusive. The Service Sector is large and inclusive.

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Any sensible Tea Party would actually have known what the oceans were really for!)

Service sector is not ALL inclusive, as OP would like to dream...

from the linked report.

Employment in the goods-producing sector rose 27,000 in June,
more than reversing the decline of 10,000 in May. Manufacturing employment rose 24,000 in June, which has seen growth in seven of the past eight months.

Good numbers? Kind of.

They do indicate that there ARE sectors of employment that have seen declines in the last 18 months... not the 18 months of steady gains the OP is trying to make people believe, when even his own source didn't say that.

From the linked report...
Employment in the construction industry dropped 4,000 in June, but has been essentially flat since last December. The total decrease in construction employment since its peak in January 2007 is 2,124,000. Employment in the financial services sector decreased 3,000 in June, bringing the total employment decrease for that same period to 686,000.
Again, the report the OP linked to shows multiple sectors with poor numbers... once again proving the OP's contention that there have been 18 months of steady gains to be untrue.

In short, the service sector is not the end all and be all of employment. Yes, it has seen increase in the last 18 months, but they are up and down as the report showed... anything but steady. And, as the report also showed, most other sectors did not show that same pattern, and many had lower employment numbers.
Essentially... the OP was trying to mislead the people reading, hoping they would not bother to check his sources or call him out on his lie.

The FAIL is strong in him.
 
Last edited:
U. S. Labor Department actually has a category, "self-employed labor," which is likely not reflected in payroll. That is 7% of labor, which may be be service or not.

Regardless, Construction labor is only 4% of it all. That is the sector that Conservative poster claims is the only employment sector there is!

Official Service Sector employment is nearly 80% without counting the 7% above.

So OP is not misleading anyone at all!

Stupid Conservative poster can't find a 90% solution to anything. The current Obama employment rate is 91% all by itself, so far.

That is far more than the 4% that Conservative poster, claims is all there is!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many on Lands of Many Nations: Now know more than financial services sectors, at rate. Many Nations actually set rates, now, in favor of the Establishment, and not to the disadvantage of the establishment.)
 
U. S. Labor Department actually has a category, "self-employed labor," which is likely not reflected in payroll. That is 7% of labor, which may be be service or not.

Regardless, Construction labor is only 4% of it all. That is the sector that Conservative poster claims is the only employment sector there is!

Official Service Sector employment is nearly 80% without counting the 7% above.

So OP is not misleading anyone at all!

Stupid Conservative poster can't find a 90% solution to anything. The current Obama employment rate is 91% all by itself, so far.

That is far more than the 4% that Conservative poster, claims is all there is!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many on Lands of Many Nations: Now know more than financial services sectors, at rate. Many Nations actually set rates, now, in favor of the Establishment, and not to the disadvantage of the establishment.)

you lie about what the reports actually says... I show you the lie, and you get pissy and call me names.

That's all you got?

Sad.
 
U. S. Labor Department actually has a category, "self-employed labor," which is likely not reflected in payroll. That is 7% of labor, which may be be service or not.

Regardless, Construction labor is only 4% of it all. That is the sector that Conservative poster claims is the only employment sector there is!

Official Service Sector employment is nearly 80% without counting the 7% above.

So OP is not misleading anyone at all!

Stupid Conservative poster can't find a 90% solution to anything. The current Obama employment rate is 91% all by itself, so far.

That is far more than the 4% that Conservative poster, claims is all there is!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Many on Lands of Many Nations: Now know more than financial services sectors, at rate. Many Nations actually set rates, now, in favor of the Establishment, and not to the disadvantage of the establishment.)

you lie about what the reports actually says... I show you the lie, and you get pissy and call me names.

That's all you got?

Sad.

He didn't call you names.

He just busted you with the facts.
 
So what became of the on-going Stimulus program after all? In the private sector, 18 months of steady job gains! Those are all Democratic Party created gains. The Republicans virtually universally said, "No!" to any further job gains!

ADP Employment Report

The Party of Abraham Lincoln even famously, took away Santa Clause, the Schedule M in the U. S. Internal Revenue Code. That was the "Make Work Pay," refundable tax credit.

The Republican Party was created at about the same time as Simon Legree: And it shows. Their newly elected, Party of Herbert Hoover state and local people: Are taking even new state and local government jobs away!

"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(Party of Lincoln Treat Santa Clause to A Liberian Movement kind of status!)

Then why is the unemployment rate 1.3 % higher than when he took office? Or are we now claiming that as unemployment rises, jobs are created? Or, are you talking about the gazillion gubmint bureaucrats created?

B.S. It's a s bad as ever...
 
Or, as I suspect, this is the part where you loose $100 at the casino, then win $20 and when you get home you tell your wife you won $20, ignoring the fact hat YOU ALSO LOST $100?
 

Forum List

Back
Top