Gunny
Gold Member
Okay. Fallon was forced out because he didn't buy the party line. It's been like that since the begining of this war. Say what you want, but Shinseki was talking about the occupation, not the invasion and he was right.
The only Senior Military opinions allowed are those that agree with Bush & Company.
That type of management is dangerous to say the least. If you only listen to those who agree with you, you get into a situation called groupthink.
Wikipedia
When you limit the incoming data to only what you want, it is a sure way to ensure failure wether you are right or left. That's is how the whole Watergate episode came about.
That is also one of the reasons we have had such problems in coming up with a real strategy in Iraq. One that works. If you only try what you agree with and you ignore other Senior Miltary input, you are ensuring an unecessarily long and bloody war.
LtCol Evans Carlson debriefed every battle the Raiders did. He listened to all the troops who had input. I don't care if he was a socialist later in life, he had the best kill and lowest casualty ratio. That defines military success.
Hardly something new or even extraordinary for the CinC to replace his Commanders if he doesn't agree with them or the job they're doing.
Lincoln ran through WAY more commanders than Bush has. So did Jefferson Davis for that matter. Truman publicly relieved MacArthur for cause.
Carlson was a socialist even at THAT time in his life. He is the one creditted for coining the term "Gung Ho"; which, in Chinese means all work together. His kill vs casualty ratio can be attributed to the missions he carried out. It isn't like the Raiders loaded up on Higgins boats or LVT's and perfromed frontal amphibious assaults in broad daylight.
And I really don't get putting an Admiral in overall command of what is primarily a ground force. I wouldn't take a Gen who came up as a tank, artillery or infantry officer and give him command of a Naval Battle Group.