Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
As mentioned at the end of the editorial, if Dick Cheney had tried this he'd be accused of making a coup.
Why aren't liberals up in arms over this blatant disregard for the Constitution and the Senate's powers??
Review & Outlook: Elizabeth III - WSJ.com
As mentioned at the end of the editorial, if Dick Cheney had tried this he'd be accused of making a coup.
Why aren't liberals up in arms over this blatant disregard for the Constitution and the Senate's powers??
Review & Outlook: Elizabeth III - WSJ.com
Have you contacted a psychiatrist about this? Your hysteria is showing
The White House has tapped Elizabeth Warren as a special adviser to help set up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, affirming its support for a tough new agency charged with protecting consumers from abusive lenders.
The move allows her to act as an interim head of the CFPB and will enable her to begin setting up the agency immediately and prevent the GOP from filibustering her nomination. Warren could serve until President Barack Obama nominates a permanent director to serve the five-year term -- a nomination he's not required to make for some time. Obama also could nominate her as the permanent director in the near future, a prospect that has been discussed among top aides, according to a person familiar with White House deliberations. Warren formally will be named as a special adviser reporting directly to Obama, and serving in a similar capacity to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, later this week.
As mentioned at the end of the editorial, if Dick Cheney had tried this he'd be accused of making a coup.
Why aren't liberals up in arms over this blatant disregard for the Constitution and the Senate's powers??
Review & Outlook: Elizabeth III - WSJ.com
Have you contacted a psychiatrist about this? Your hysteria is showing
Did you actually read the piece?
The White House has tapped Elizabeth Warren as a special adviser to help set up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, affirming its support for a tough new agency charged with protecting consumers from abusive lenders.
The move allows her to act as an interim head of the CFPB and will enable her to begin setting up the agency immediately and prevent the GOP from filibustering her nomination. Warren could serve until President Barack Obama nominates a permanent director to serve the five-year term -- a nomination he's not required to make for some time. Obama also could nominate her as the permanent director in the near future, a prospect that has been discussed among top aides, according to a person familiar with White House deliberations. Warren formally will be named as a special adviser reporting directly to Obama, and serving in a similar capacity to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, later this week.
White House Taps Warren To Set Up Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/18/us/politics/18warren.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=elizabeth%20warren&st=cse
You weaken your arguments when you parrot right wing blogs without fact checking, The Rabbi.
I wonder what other news organizations are saying about this? I wonder if they
The White House has tapped Elizabeth Warren as a special adviser to help set up the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, affirming its support for a tough new agency charged with protecting consumers from abusive lenders.
The move allows her to act as an interim head of the CFPB and will enable her to begin setting up the agency immediately and prevent the GOP from filibustering her nomination. Warren could serve until President Barack Obama nominates a permanent director to serve the five-year term -- a nomination he's not required to make for some time. Obama also could nominate her as the permanent director in the near future, a prospect that has been discussed among top aides, according to a person familiar with White House deliberations. Warren formally will be named as a special adviser reporting directly to Obama, and serving in a similar capacity to Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, later this week.
White House Taps Warren To Set Up Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/18/us/politics/18warren.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=elizabeth%20warren&st=cse
You weaken your arguments when you parrot right wing blogs without fact checking, The Rabbi.
First, the Wall St Journal editorial page is not a "right wing blog."
Second, your links do nothing to change the facts of the story, which are appalling.
But you don't see the problem with calling someone a Nazi, so why am I not surprised?
As mentioned at the end of the editorial, if Dick Cheney had tried this he'd be accused of making a coup.
Why aren't liberals up in arms over this blatant disregard for the Constitution and the Senate's powers??
Review & Outlook: Elizabeth III - WSJ.com
Have you contacted a psychiatrist about this? Your hysteria is showing
White House Taps Warren To Set Up Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/18/us/politics/18warren.html?_r=1&scp=2&sq=elizabeth%20warren&st=cse
You weaken your arguments when you parrot right wing blogs without fact checking, The Rabbi.
First, the Wall St Journal editorial page is not a "right wing blog."
Second, your links do nothing to change the facts of the story, which are appalling.
But you don't see the problem with calling someone a Nazi, so why am I not surprised?
The Rabbi, you do know that Rupert Murdock has bought the WSJ and that that paper and the NY Times are involved in a subscriber war? But no matter.
Explain to me how appointing an interim director is unconstitutional...in your own words. I'm not feeling it.
As for the Nazi thing, I said "I wouldn't do it but if Halvorson's supporters did, so what?" Free speech, remember?
I thought Mitch had already done all of that?
As mentioned at the end of the editorial, if Dick Cheney had tried this he'd be accused of making a coup.
Why aren't liberals up in arms over this blatant disregard for the Constitution and the Senate's powers??
Review & Outlook: Elizabeth III - WSJ.com
Have you contacted a psychiatrist about this? Your hysteria is showing
Did you actually read the piece?
RetiredGySgt wrote:
I am sure he did not. This is blatantly Unconstitutional. The President can not name Special advisers outside the Cabinet that supersede the Cabinet WITHOUT Senate approval.
I doubt the Democrats care and as a Republican Senate leader I would first demand the Senate act and when it does not I would bring a suit in Federal Court against the White House and the leaders of the Senate.
RetiredGySgt wrote:
I am sure he did not. This is blatantly Unconstitutional. The President can not name Special advisers outside the Cabinet that supersede the Cabinet WITHOUT Senate approval.
I doubt the Democrats care and as a Republican Senate leader I would first demand the Senate act and when it does not I would bring a suit in Federal Court against the White House and the leaders of the Senate.
RetiredGySgt, have you got any case law or other authority to back up your claim, or are you just opining here?
As mentioned at the end of the editorial, if Dick Cheney had tried this he'd be accused of making a coup.
Why aren't liberals up in arms over this blatant disregard for the Constitution and the Senate's powers??
Review & Outlook: Elizabeth III - WSJ.com
As mentioned at the end of the editorial, if Dick Cheney had tried this he'd be accused of making a coup.
Why aren't liberals up in arms over this blatant disregard for the Constitution and the Senate's powers??
Review & Outlook: Elizabeth III - WSJ.com
"The chutzpah here is something to behold. The pride of Harvard Law School, Ms. Warren is a hero to the political left for proposing a new bureaucracy to micromanage the services that banks can offer consumers."
