ACLU Sues Over Racist Photo ID Law

[Resnic]

How is not racist? Saying everyone needs a photo id isn't racist because everyone needs one.

And that nonsense of it impacts poor blacks is a lie because there are millions of broke ass white people in this country also.

And if you're an American and you can't even afford a 3 dollar state issued I'd, or many states have free photo state id. If you can't even get a state id you shouldn't be voting anyway.

Fuck blacks. They maxed out their race card a long time ago.

 

[Mashmont]

1. "Madison - The American Civil Liberties Union sued the State of Wisconsin on Tuesday over a new law requiring voters to show government-issued photo identification, charging that the measure violates the U.S. Constitution.

The lawsuit says that the state is infringing on some citizens' right to vote and to be treated equally under the law and amounts to a kind of poll tax on voters who lack the documents needed to get an approved ID.

Republican lawmakers and Gov. Scott Walker, who is named in the lawsuit..."

"This lawsuit is the opening act in what will be a long struggle to undo the damage done to the right to vote by strict photo ID laws and other voter suppression measures," said Jon Sherman, an attorney with the ACLU Voting Rights Project."
ACLU sues Wisconsin over photo ID law - JSOnline


And, in a related story....

2. "On Wednesday, the Politico ran a story about the International Association of Machinists Union at Boeing agreeing to approve a contract extension, the result of which ultimately led to the National Labor Relations Board dropping its controversial decision to prevent the company from beginning to operate a mostly-constructed plant in South Carolina.

Though it deserves separate commentary, that decision is not the subject of this post. What is germane at the moment is the howler of a photo accompanying the Politico's report which appears after the jump.

The International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers (IAM) has given 99% of its campaign money to Democrats (according to ElectionLawCenter.com, citing OpenSecrets.org). Democrats, including Obama administration Attorney General Eric Holder, who will be in Austin, Texas tomorrow supporting the rejection of voter-ID laws and, according to the Texas GOP, "NAACP plans to involve the United Nations on (sic) US elections," abhor the idea of making voters bring some form of photo identification to the polls.

Yet the IAM in the instance photographed required a photo ID of all who wished to vote in a contract ratification election. From the looks of the professionally made sign, the photo-ID requirement in the union's elections would appear to be far from an isolated instance. Gosh, I wonder why?"
Union Election Requires Photo ID; Politico Fails to Note Irony | NewsBusters.org

Hmmm.....seems that a certain party wants to make sure that voter fraud is memorialized in law...but has the classic NIMBY attitude when it comes to their own.....

Does this mean that the Democrats cannot get legal voters to support their platform (Income equality, economic central planning, global governance under worldwide socialism.)?

Could be, huh?

Never mind the things you need a photo ID for that black folks already use:

THESE are 22 things you need an ID for in the U.S. [2022]

Buying alcohol
Opening a bank account
Applying for EBT Cards
Applying for Welfare
Applying for Medicaid
Applying for Social Security
Renting a House
Buying or Renting a Car
Flying on an Airplane
Purchasing a Gun
Adopting a Pet
Renting a Hotel Room
Buying a Cellphone
Picking up Prescription Medication
Visiting a Casino
Purchasing Tobacco
Applying for Unemployment
More.....