ACLU hard at work.

ACLU says school censored student's Milk report

What absolute retarded shit. Talk about an agenda. The school will bow to the pressure but if it were me I would tell them to go pound sand.

Really? This is all you have? A school that are so stuck up their own asses that they want to censor something just because it's about a gay rights activist? They wouldn't have censored anything about MLK Jr.. Unless the kid talked about sex specifically and had graphic demonstrations ... why the hell would a school be so idiotic, it's part of history. Seriously, for once the ACLU got one right.
 
Yup and if this were about Garfield we wouldn't have even heard about it. BUT since anything Gay is good, well damn it is national news.

Got it right? Not even close it is a fucking elementary school. What the hell is wrong with you? Since when do we sue Elementary schools for doing their damn jobs? And since when does a report become a National News item from an ELEMENTARY School? Why just as soon as it has any dealings with a Gay, that is when.

I bet if little Suzy did a report on that guy in Iowa that is trying to get to the Supreme Court about the fact they are sending him to jail for sleeping with his ADULT CONSENTING STEP DAUGHTER none of us would have heard about it. The ACLU wouldn't have even listened to the problem much less spend time and effort to threaten an ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Nor would it be NATIONAL NEWS.

You see DUMB ASS, that too would fall under CURRENT EVENTS. Just as important as HISTORY.
 
Yup and if this were about Garfield we wouldn't have even heard about it. BUT since anything Gay is good, well damn it is national news.

That's silly. If it were about Garfield then I doubt the school would have done anything about it so naturally we wouldn't be hearing about it.

Got it right? Not even close it is a fucking elementary school. What the hell is wrong with you? Since when do we sue Elementary schools for doing their damn jobs? And since when does a report become a National News item from an ELEMENTARY School? Why just as soon as it has any dealings with a Gay, that is when.

What's their job here? The presentation had nothing to do with sex ed.

It becomes national news when the ACLU files a lawsuit it seems.

And these are 6th graders, I understand that this is an elementary school but that was junior high for me. We're talking 12 year olds here.

I bet if little Suzy did a report on that guy in Iowa that is trying to get to the Supreme Court about the fact they are sending him to jail for sleeping with his ADULT CONSENTING STEP DAUGHTER none of us would have heard about it. The ACLU wouldn't have even listened to the problem much less spend time and effort to threaten an ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Nor would it be NATIONAL NEWS.

You see DUMB ASS, that too would fall under CURRENT EVENTS. Just as important as HISTORY.

We don't know what the actual assignment was. For all we know at this point the assignment could just have been to do a presentation on a historical figure you admire. I doubt some schmo in Iowa who is currently in a fight to bang his stepdaughter would qualify.

Why does the anti-gay crowd automatically take things to the extreme when they come up with these imaginary scenarios?
 
Yup and if this were about Garfield we wouldn't have even heard about it. BUT since anything Gay is good, well damn it is national news.

That's silly. If it were about Garfield then I doubt the school would have done anything about it so naturally we wouldn't be hearing about it.

Got it right? Not even close it is a fucking elementary school. What the hell is wrong with you? Since when do we sue Elementary schools for doing their damn jobs? And since when does a report become a National News item from an ELEMENTARY School? Why just as soon as it has any dealings with a Gay, that is when.

What's their job here? The presentation had nothing to do with sex ed.

It becomes national news when the ACLU files a lawsuit it seems.

And these are 6th graders, I understand that this is an elementary school but that was junior high for me. We're talking 12 year olds here.

I bet if little Suzy did a report on that guy in Iowa that is trying to get to the Supreme Court about the fact they are sending him to jail for sleeping with his ADULT CONSENTING STEP DAUGHTER none of us would have heard about it. The ACLU wouldn't have even listened to the problem much less spend time and effort to threaten an ELEMENTARY SCHOOL. Nor would it be NATIONAL NEWS.

You see DUMB ASS, that too would fall under CURRENT EVENTS. Just as important as HISTORY.

We don't know what the actual assignment was. For all we know at this point the assignment could just have been to do a presentation on a historical figure you admire. I doubt some schmo in Iowa who is currently in a fight to bang his stepdaughter would qualify.

Why does the anti-gay crowd automatically take things to the extreme when they come up with these imaginary scenarios?

Why does the Pro Gay crowd insist on ignorant stunts like this?
 
Why does the anti-gay crowd automatically take things to the extreme when they come up with these imaginary scenarios?

Because like most people who hate, the are fearful and they are zealots.... thus skewing their sense of reality.

but if i have things straight, he is morally offended that the child NOT be censored and prevented from giving a report about a figure in history who happens to be gay; but thinks the right of a parent to medically neglect their child, thereby allowing him to die, should be constitutionally protected.

:cuckoo:
 
Why does the anti-gay crowd automatically take things to the extreme when they come up with these imaginary scenarios?

Because like most people who hate, the are fearful and they are zealots.... thus skewing their sense of reality.

but if i have things straight, he is morally offended that the child NOT be censored and prevented from giving a report about a figure in history who happens to be gay; but thinks the right of a parent to medically neglect their child, thereby allowing him to die, should be constitutionally protected.

:cuckoo:

Hate to break up your little love fest but 6th graders do not have 1st amendment rights the same as everyone else. But hey nice try.
 
Hate to break up your little love fest but 6th graders do not have 1st amendment rights the same as everyone else. But hey nice try.

I'd be interested to see where in the constitution you found that little exemption. Unless you're going to argue that 6th graders don't qualify as "people".
 
I love how some people rant and rave that PCism is so horrible, but jump on the band wagon when it supports their form of censorship. This is one of the very few times the ACLU was right, suck it up and take it like a freedom lover RGS (and anyone who agrees with the censorship of the school). It's part of history, editing history is the worst form of censorship, it's censoring real fucking life, period. Kids are suppose to learn about their world, it's not about sex, it's about equal rights, and until breeders like RGS get that through their thick skulls the ACLU will continue to hold too much power.
 
This insanity makes a good argument for home schooling! as the libtards are so fond of saying.. " teaching 6th graders about homosexuality isn't a priority" obamalama is fighting two wars and has a bunch of terrorists he needs to figure out what to do with now that he's opened his big mouth and made insane promised to the democwat socialist libtards on the left.
 
This insanity makes a good argument for home schooling! as the libtards are so fond of saying.. " teaching 6th graders about homosexuality isn't a priority" obamalama is fighting two wars and has a bunch of terrorists he needs to figure out what to do with now that he's opened his big mouth and made insane promised to the democwat socialist libtards on the left.

Hmm ... so you don't teach your kids about history, good to know.
 
so if they would have let the girl go on,then they get sued by the "outraged" parents.....CHRIST i am glad my kids out of school
 
Hate to break up your little love fest but 6th graders do not have 1st amendment rights the same as everyone else. But hey nice try.

I'd be interested to see where in the constitution you found that little exemption. Unless you're going to argue that 6th graders don't qualify as "people".

You MAY want to take up your complaint with the COURTS, Starting with the Supreme Court. What I find HILARIOUS is Jillian keeps reminding us she is a Lawyer and posted this crap anyway.

The Courts have held repeatedly that school children do NOT have all the rights and protections of speech as adults. That schools can and must at times censor or control that freedom in a school environment.
 
I love how some people rant and rave that PCism is so horrible, but jump on the band wagon when it supports their form of censorship. This is one of the very few times the ACLU was right, suck it up and take it like a freedom lover RGS (and anyone who agrees with the censorship of the school). It's part of history, editing history is the worst form of censorship, it's censoring real fucking life, period. Kids are suppose to learn about their world, it's not about sex, it's about equal rights, and until breeders like RGS get that through their thick skulls the ACLU will continue to hold too much power.


Imagine if this kid was not allowed to give a report on creationism...
 
I love how some people rant and rave that PCism is so horrible, but jump on the band wagon when it supports their form of censorship. This is one of the very few times the ACLU was right, suck it up and take it like a freedom lover RGS (and anyone who agrees with the censorship of the school). It's part of history, editing history is the worst form of censorship, it's censoring real fucking life, period. Kids are suppose to learn about their world, it's not about sex, it's about equal rights, and until breeders like RGS get that through their thick skulls the ACLU will continue to hold too much power.


Imagine if this kid was not allowed to give a report on creationism...

They would demand the school was shut down! :eek:

Though next I suspect they won't be able to teach art, it promotes sexual behavior. :cuckoo:
 
I love how some people rant and rave that PCism is so horrible, but jump on the band wagon when it supports their form of censorship. This is one of the very few times the ACLU was right, suck it up and take it like a freedom lover RGS (and anyone who agrees with the censorship of the school). It's part of history, editing history is the worst form of censorship, it's censoring real fucking life, period. Kids are suppose to learn about their world, it's not about sex, it's about equal rights, and until breeders like RGS get that through their thick skulls the ACLU will continue to hold too much power.


Imagine if this kid was not allowed to give a report on creationism...

Actually that happens routinely through out America, schools bar those topics and if someone does them on their own faces usually punishment of some kind. But nice attempt to twist and turn. DUMB ASS.
 
I love how some people rant and rave that PCism is so horrible, but jump on the band wagon when it supports their form of censorship. This is one of the very few times the ACLU was right, suck it up and take it like a freedom lover RGS (and anyone who agrees with the censorship of the school). It's part of history, editing history is the worst form of censorship, it's censoring real fucking life, period. Kids are suppose to learn about their world, it's not about sex, it's about equal rights, and until breeders like RGS get that through their thick skulls the ACLU will continue to hold too much power.


Imagine if this kid was not allowed to give a report on creationism...

Actually that happens routinely through out America, schools bar those topics and if someone does them on their own faces usually punishment of some kind. But nice attempt to twist and turn. DUMB ASS.

Yeah ... sure, and the media just for some reason decides that those story gems, great hype, plenty of controversy, are just not worth the air time .... sure.
 
'Scuse me, but the ACLU would not have gotten involved had someone, like the parents for instance, gotten them involved. Shouldn't the question be "Why?"
 
'Scuse me, but the ACLU would not have gotten involved had someone, like the parents for instance, gotten them involved. Shouldn't the question be "Why?"

Because little SUSIE was upset. A 6th grader got mad and her mother ran to the ACLU and dumb ass's on the left are applauding it. 6th Graders do not now nor have they EVER had the full protection of the 1st Amendment while in school. The Supreme Court has ruled on this before.

How and when a Teacher allows a Student to read a report is no business of the ACLU. The school made a judgement call. WHICH we pay them to make. She was not censored at all, as they let her read the report anyway.

The school should threaten to sue the ACLU for a frivolous threat to sue them. It is PAST time we start standing up to the IDIOTS.
 

Forum List

Back
Top