ACLU files suit on Arizona law

Right, and it would be a fucking shame if NAMBLA couldn't post freely, right ? ......:eusa_whistle:

what is your issue with the NAMBLA case? are you a thought crime proponent? and they have upheld everyone's right to post freely including yours. the country would be a lot less "free" without the aclu & eff

somehow I think we could manage.. just think our own country with our own borders.. that's clearly something you don't wish for.

again, you wouldn't be able to post much online without their cases, and they aren't for open bordres from what I have read, they just don't want people who are legally here to be harassed, arrested or deported as many of them will be
 
Just like i would be stopped in arizona this man has been stopped twice.

Stop pretending only illegal aliens will be effected by the law.

What's the first thing an officer asks for when you're stopped for a traffic violation ? ...

"a Latino citizen studying at Arizona State University, whose New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted as proof of citizenship under the law;"

you have some severe comprehension problems huh?

Why do you think a New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted, genius ?

Hint: The leftist idiots you support caused the problem ......
 
what is your issue with the NAMBLA case? are you a thought crime proponent? and they have upheld everyone's right to post freely including yours. the country would be a lot less "free" without the aclu & eff

somehow I think we could manage.. just think our own country with our own borders.. that's clearly something you don't wish for.

again, you wouldn't be able to post much online without their cases, and they aren't for open bordres from what I have read, they just don't want people who are legally here to be harassed, arrested or deported as many of them will be

They oppose every measure taken to secure the borders. If that isn't for open borders I don't know what is.. Do you?
 
What's the first thing an officer asks for when you're stopped for a traffic violation ? ...

"a Latino citizen studying at Arizona State University, whose New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted as proof of citizenship under the law;"

you have some severe comprehension problems huh?

Why do you think a New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted, genius ?

Hint: The leftist idiots you support caused the problem ......

What's the first thing an officer asks for when you're stopped for a traffic violation ?
 
What's the first thing an officer asks for when you're stopped for a traffic violation ? ...

"a Latino citizen studying at Arizona State University, whose New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted as proof of citizenship under the law;"

you have some severe comprehension problems huh?

Why do you think a New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted, genius ?

Hint: The leftist idiots you support caused the problem ......



Does New Mexico issue driver's license to illegals perhaps? Slimeball turknocker dante negged me.. did he neg you too?? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:
 
Perhaps this would not be an issue if New Mexico quit handing out driver's licenses to undocumented workers. NM has ruined the legitimacy of its system of ID.
 
"a Latino citizen studying at Arizona State University, whose New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted as proof of citizenship under the law;"

you have some severe comprehension problems huh?

Why do you think a New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted, genius ?

Hint: The leftist idiots you support caused the problem ......



Does New Mexico issue driver's license to illegals perhaps? Slimeball turknocker dante negged me.. did he neg you too?? :lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah, I'm supposed to be on ignore...waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaah :lol::lol::lol:
 
somehow I think we could manage.. just think our own country with our own borders.. that's clearly something you don't wish for.

again, you wouldn't be able to post much online without their cases, and they aren't for open bordres from what I have read, they just don't want people who are legally here to be harassed, arrested or deported as many of them will be

They oppose every measure taken to secure the borders. If that isn't for open borders I don't know what is.. Do you?

get it right please, they oppose violating the rights of citizens or other people legally here to close the borders.
 
As New Mexico hands out driver's licenses without proof that a person is here in the country legally, they are not worth the laminate which encases them. Given the lack of controls, it's perfectly reasonable that states which do require proof of legal residency do not accept ID from states which do not.
 
again, you wouldn't be able to post much online without their cases, and they aren't for open bordres from what I have read, they just don't want people who are legally here to be harassed, arrested or deported as many of them will be

They oppose every measure taken to secure the borders. If that isn't for open borders I don't know what is.. Do you?

get it right please, they oppose violating the rights of citizens or other people legally here to close the borders.

I had it right. Thank You very much.
 
i love people bashing the aclu as if they would be able to post freely on the internet without the aclu & eff fighting for them

Right, and it would be a fucking shame if NAMBLA couldn't post freely, right ? ......:eusa_whistle:

what is your issue with the NAMBLA case? are you a thought crime proponent? and they have upheld everyone's right to post freely including yours. the country would be a lot less "free" without the aclu & eff

That used to be true.
The ACLU is incrementally abandoning its support of all free speech in favor of a liberal agenda. The ACLU is being transformed into just another liberal human-rights group that reably defends the rights of liberal speakers and ONLY liberal speakers. The cases the aclu ignores provide the clearest evidence of the ideological change. The organization has ignored Harper v. Poway, a case hinging on whether a student can wear a T-shirt denouncing homosexuality. This is telling because the aclu has staunchly supported the right of students to wear T-shirts that promote homosexuality, as well as those that bash President Bush; one student even received a Youth Activist Scholarship for her support of a shirt stating: “Gay, fine by me.” But when the free speech opposes homosexuality, the aclu goes mute. Even when the ever-reliable Ninth Circuit opposed Harper’s free speech, the aclu stayed out of it, ignoring the creation of a precedent rejecting the First Amendment based on “the imagined feelings of gay students.”

Ultimately, the Supreme Court vacated the decision—but the fact remains that the aclu was willing to let a precedent stand that squashes free speech.

Last year’s row over cartoons depicting the prophet Muhammad also drew total silence until enough complaints forced the aclu to respond. Kaminer suggests a growing support for “restricting what many liberals condemn as hate speech” was at play. Its board even considered a proposal last year barring board members from criticizing the aclu, a proposal Executive Director Anthony Romero supported until the Times exposed it.

There are numerous other examples of the aclu going mute in cases it disagrees with, but the real question is: Should we expect the aclu to support all free speech? If its history is our guide, absolutely yes. The protection of free speech was the guiding principle of the aclu in 1977, for example, when it successfully defended the right of the National Socialist Party of America—a group of neo-Nazis—to demonstrate in one of Chicago’s Jewish neighborhoods filled with Holocaust survivors and their families.

Disgusting? Of course. But the principle at play resonates strongly with most Americans: “I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it.” The aclu no longer supports that ideal.
The ACLU’s Liberal Bias | theTrumpet.com by the Philadelphia Church of God
 
"a Latino citizen studying at Arizona State University, whose New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted as proof of citizenship under the law;"

you have some severe comprehension problems huh?

Why do you think a New Mexico driver's license would not be accepted, genius ?

Hint: The leftist idiots you support caused the problem ......

What's the first thing an officer asks for when you're stopped for a traffic violation ?

So giving license's to illegals wasn't the sooper idea you and the leftist idiots you support thought it was ? omgnoway ......
 
Sorry bout that,


1. But the *Politcal Correctness Police* ~ *ACLU*, *Jesse Jackson*, say you can't defend USA's borders!
2. You must treat everyone the same, as if everyone here is a legal American.
3. And the judges are afraid to disagree with them, because they are just as much *Political Correct* as the *ACLU*, *Al Sharpton*.
4. We as real legal Americans are screwed.


Regards,
SirJamesofTexas
 
I think AZ should advertise that all illegal immigrants are eligible for a free one way bus ticket to, L.A., San Francisco, San Diego, Detroit, Boston or the sanctuary city of their choosing.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Vel
Ravi:

That's hardly the case.

We are supporting states not debasing their Driver's Licenses by handing them out willy nilly with no proof of legal residency required.
 
Ravi:

That's hardly the case.

We are supporting states not debasing their Driver's Licenses by handing them out willy nilly with no proof of legal residency required.
Which is a national id for all intents and purposes.

Weren't you one of the ones crying that people from one state shouldn't criticize another state just the other day.
 

Forum List

Back
Top