Accuser's Lawyer: My Client Testifying Under Oath Would be Contrary to Purposes of Discovering Truth

Play time is over.
Confirm Kavanaugh, nuke the vote if needed.

Twitter

 

Testifying under oath that you swear to tell the truth is contrary to discovering the truth? If that's not the biggest lib double speak babbling bullshit I have ever heard I don't know what is. Tune in tomorrow for the next libstain whopper!

 

Yep, no more games, just vote to put Kavanaugh on the USSC and wait for the next retirement. RBG (85), Thomas (70), Bryer (80). Thomas might want to retire while Trump is in office to guarantee a conservative nominee. Bryer and Ginsberg are holding out until a dem is elected, maybe 2025?? Good luck with maybe 6 more golden years on the court until age 91 for Ruth, or 86 for Bryer. Trump could setup the USSC for a generation or two.

 

Translation, "We just need to delay this thing another month or so, and no, I'm not ready to set my client up for perjury charges!"

 

All the circling around and deflecting this accuser is doing will get Kavanaugh in by next week.

 

And as an added bonus, kill whatever chance there was for a blue wave

 

It's hard to top the previous: It's not up to my client to substantiate her claim.

 

The good thing is that people from all over the country and all walks of life are seeing just how GD SORRY liberals are.

 

Red wave incoming.

 

This is their desperation mode. They've never been this obvious before because they are running for their lives.