PubliusInfinitum
Rookie
- Aug 18, 2008
- 6,805
- 729
- 0
- Banned
- #41
From the Levin Senate Report...
"The abuse of detainees at Abu Ghraib in late 2003 was not simply a result of a few soldiers acting on their own," the Senate report says. "Interrogation techniques such as stripping detainees of their clothes, placing them in stress positions and using military working dogs to intimidate them appeared in Iraq only after they had been approved for use in Afghanistan and at (Guantánamo) ... Rumsfeld's authorization of aggressive interrogation techniques and subsequent interrogation policies and plans approved by senior military and civilian officers conveyed the message that physical pressures and degradation were appropriate treatment for detainees in U.S. military custody. What followed was an erosion in standards dictating that detainees be treated humanely." [/url]
The abuses at Abu Ghraib coincided with the arrival of Major General Geoffrey Miller, former GITMO commander. General George Fay wrote in the Taguba Report that,
Policies and practices developed and approved for use on Al Qaeda and Taliban detainees [in Afghanistan and Guantánamo] who were not afforded the protection of the Geneva Conventions, now applied to detainees who did fall under the Geneva Conventions' protections.
So let's address your points...
They were given orders, vague orders, by intel officers to "soften up" the prisoners. Failing to seek clarification of those orders, however, is no excuse....
Now had you stopped right here... you'd have had a terrific argument.
One can't recognize that the orders were vague and illegal and that such doesn't constitute an excuse and then immediately turn to rationalize that such was a valid excuse.
The Soldiers were trained to know better... but that training was undermined by poor leadership.
Sound leadership would have required written orders outlining acceptable procedures... Sound leadership would have prevented photographs of those procedures to be taken; Sound leadership would have prohibited the sending of such photographs home... and so on...
"vague orders" are not orders... sound leadership doesn't accept non-orders as orders and doesn't allow their command to be subjected to the catastrophic certainty of such...