but the added benefit over other methods is the control of stds....what would the rate be with no condoms there againshelia...lets look up the aids infection rate without condoms..what is it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
but the added benefit over other methods is the control of stds....what would the rate be with no condoms there againshelia...lets look up the aids infection rate without condoms..what is it?
Good question.
Why IS it the man's responsibility, but the woman's choice?
Good question.
Why IS it the man's responsibility, but the woman's choice?
That's what I wonder.
What I really love is the women who lie not only to the guy but in a court of law to the judge on whether the kid that occurred in the marriage was really his.
So because the guy didn't distrust his wife enough to get a DNA test in the first year, he's stuck paying child support for whatever kids occurred in said marriage for the next 18 years.
And the court system actually helps the women do such a thing. By threatening to throw the guy in jail, take away his license among other things,etc if he doesn't pay.
If you have a child while married, it's your kid. Even if the child is biologically someone else's the old laws make it the responsibility of the husband.
A few years ago, there was a case where a woman left her husband a lived with another man for a short time. She got pregnant by him and then reconciled with her spouse. The man wanted visiting rights to his child, he was even willing to pay child support but the woman and the husband refused. The court ruled by law, the child belonged to the husband and the biological father had no rights.
If you have a child while married, it's your kid. Even if the child is biologically someone else's the old laws make it the responsibility of the husband.
A few years ago, there was a case where a woman left her husband a lived with another man for a short time. She got pregnant by him and then reconciled with her spouse. The man wanted visiting rights to his child, he was even willing to pay child support but the woman and the husband refused. The court ruled by law, the child belonged to the husband and the biological father had no rights.
Well the old laws are wrong, as is the situation you listed below. This is what I'm refering to when I say this is insane.
I agree, but you have to realize the laws were made before dna tests were available, and they were made to protect the children.
Good question.
Why IS it the man's responsibility, but the woman's choice?
That's what I wonder.
Because it's a woman's world, baby.
What's that logical fallacy that says if you can find even 1 exception you nullify the argument? I can never think of what that one is called.
Do you truly believe this is 1 exception to the rule? REALLY?
I agree, but you have to realize the laws were made before dna tests were available, and they were made to protect the children.
Oh I understand this completely. I'm just finding it insane that these laws haven't been changed yet. Especially with the amount of people it affects.
Women rule, men drool. Well, sometimes women drool, too. But you get the picture.Good question.
Why IS it the man's responsibility, but the woman's choice?
That's what I wonder.
Because it's a woman's world, baby.
It's a womans world up to the point of ejaculation...once the man has the baby batter off the brain he is able to think much more clearly.
And that's when we have you by the short and curlies.
the woman doesn't share blame for not putting a condom on the mans dick as well?
plus you also get
woman- No need for that..I'm on the pill
6 weeks later
Woman- I'm Pregnant
andrew your dick...your sperm...take care of it....or no one else will
sex with a condom is awful...all women should be forced to take the pill.
then again this all goes with my theory that men should get blow jobs 3 times a day....this would bring down pregnancy