Absolutely THE Best Description Of Dems You'll Ever Read

[NYcarbineer]

FALSE...civil unions do not replace the benefits of marriage...

What Are the Differences between Marriage and Civil Unions?
There are significant differences between the benefits and responsibilities of marriage and civil unions. People who are married usually enjoy more benefits than those in civil unions, including:

• Legal recognition of the relationship in other states
• The ability to divorce in any state, regardless of where married
• Tax benefits available to married couples only
• Immigration benefits when petitioning for a non-citizen spouse
• Federal benefits, such as social security, medical, and life insurance

- See more at: Marriage Compared to Civil Unions LegalMatch Law Library

Gays were offered a Civil Union with EVERY SINGLE BENEFIT OF A MARRIAGE.

Every one. Every single one.

And they refused.

Your post is nothing but lies.

Your admission is that gays deserve marriage equality in every aspect except using the word.

 

[Edgetho]

A marriage license IS a civil union license you moron.

Is that why they say "Marriage Certificate" on them you stupid fucking bitch?

dimocraps really are some stupid motherfuckers

 

[Edgetho]

Your admission is that gays deserve marriage equality in every aspect except using the word.

Yes. That is EXACTLY what I am saying.

Let me run this by you for the 50th fucking time........

If someone can't or won't form a lasting relationship with a member of the opposite sex for WHATEVER REASON.......

And the only relationship they CAN form is with a member of the same sex, I'm okay with that.

I am FOR people being happy in a relationship with someone. Someone that cares about them, someone to help them, someone to take care of them when they're sick, someone they can count on.

I'm good with all that.

BUT DON'T CALL IT A MARRIAGE!!!

Because it isn't. It just isn't

 

[Bfgrn]

The left does not care about social justice. It cares about power.

That is why no truce is possible with the left.

Precisely.

But, you claim you are a liberal...

No, I am liberal by classic definition, as were the Founders. I am not "a liberal" in the modern sense by any standard.

So this is what you believe?

Too funny. What point are you trying to make with these particular quotes? Please expand.

Do keep in mind that I do not agree with every Founder on every point they ever made anymore than they agreed with each other.

My point is you are not a liberal in ANY sense or definition. You are a right wing conservative. Why are you so ashamed?

 

[Edgetho]

My point is you are not a liberal in ANY sense or definition. You are a right wing conservative. Why are you so ashamed?

What qualifies you to judge what someone is or isn't?

If a person self identifies as a liberal, he or she is a liberal in their own minds,

I have yet to run across one self-identified 'liberal' on this Board who is actually a liberal.

They are all radical socialist scum

 

[Bfgrn]

My point is you are not a liberal in ANY sense or definition. You are a right wing conservative. Why are you so ashamed?

What qualifies you to judge what someone is or isn't?

If a person self identifies as a liberal, he or she is a liberal in their own minds,

I have yet to run across one self-identified 'liberal' on this Board who is actually a liberal.

They are all radical socialist scum

What 'qualifies' me is I am able to read and comprehend what people say. Yet YOU in the very next sentence claim the YOU are 'qualified' to spot liberals...

Mindless, vitriolic emotes are your specialty.

 

[deltex1]

I've been saying this for years. Listen up, people. The sooner you recognize what you're up against, the better

"Fool, prate not to me about covenants. There can be no covenants between men and lions, wolves and lambs can never be of one mind, but hate each other out and out an through. Therefore there can be no understanding between you and me, nor may there be any covenants between us, till one or other shall fall and glut grim Mars with his life's blood. Put forth all your strength; you have need now to prove yourself indeed a bold soldier and man of war. You have no more chance, and Pallas Minerva will forthwith vanquish you by my spear: you shall now pay me in full for the grief you have caused me on account of my comrades whom you have killed in battle."

Sultan Knish: No Truce With the Left

The left does not care about social justice. It cares about power.

That is why no truce is possible with the left. Not on social issues. Not on any issues.

The left is a drunk in a bar trying to pick a fight with you. Trying to convince him that you didn't disrespect him, put something in his beer to make him dizzy or make his feet so heavy won't work. There's no 'agree to disagree' possible here. He's picking a fight with you because he wants a fight.

The left does not care about Bruce Jenner. It does not care about gay rights, equal pay, police brutality or even slavery. Its activists 'care' about those things a great deal right now, but they could easily be persuaded tomorrow to be outraged by telephone poles, shredded wheat or people in green sweaters.

...The left will destroy the things you care about, because you care about them. It will destroy them because that gives them power over you. It will destroy them because these things stand in the way of its power. It will destroy them because a good deal of its militant activists need things to destroy and if they can't attack you, they'll turn on the left in a frenzy of ideologically incestuous purges.

Their end goal? Passivity and compliance on your part.

Edge:
Much more at the link, H/T Ace of Spades HQ

Believe it, people

The same attitude applies to radical Muslims. As we sit, cowering in our homes on this Independence Day weekend, consider what Obabbles "strategic patience" has wrought in the Middle East....and is now spreading across the world.

 

[Edgetho]

What 'qualifies' me is I am able to read and comprehend what people say. Yet YOU in the very next sentence claim the YOU are 'qualified' to spot liberals...

Mindless, vitriolic emotes are your specialty.

My dog doesn't understand me either

 

[Bfgrn]

What 'qualifies' me is I am able to read and comprehend what people say. Yet YOU in the very next sentence claim the YOU are 'qualified' to spot liberals...

Mindless, vitriolic emotes are your specialty.

My dog doesn't understand me either

That's because you can't lie to a dog.

Billy_Kinetta or anyone else on this board can carry whatever beliefs THEY choose. But if someone is going to try to approriate our founding fathers as carrying the SAME beliefs, it then requires a burden of proof.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

People have been wondering why dimocfrap scum, butt rangers and bean flickers Demanded the 'right' to marry when a Civil Union would have done just as well.....

There's your answer, people.

They attack and they destroy because -- They can.

No more complicated than that

Once you admit that a civil union for gays is acceptable, you have admitted that same sex marriage is acceptable.

Once you've admitted that same sex marriage is acceptable, that you remain opposed to it is irrational.

You, sir, are irrational.

Pure Bunk.
It just shows we want to keep the sanctity of marriage intact.
But that wasnt good enough for homos,they wanted to destroy that sanctity.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

My point is you are not a liberal in ANY sense or definition. You are a right wing conservative.

Certainly, not as defined by you and the Democrats.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

What 'qualifies' me is I am able to read and comprehend what people say.

Too funny.

"My sources say no."

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

But if someone is going to try to approriate our founding fathers as carrying the SAME beliefs, it then requires a burden of proof.

So, the Democrats will be providing that soon?

By the way, it's "appropriate", Your Brilliance. Try Spell-Check.

It's like ... right there.

 

[bripat9643]

People have been wondering why dimocfrap scum, butt rangers and bean flickers Demanded the 'right' to marry when a Civil Union would have done just as well.....

There's your answer, people.

They attack and they destroy because -- They can.

No more complicated than that

Once you admit that a civil union for gays is acceptable, you have admitted that same sex marriage is acceptable.

Once you've admitted that same sex marriage is acceptable, that you remain opposed to it is irrational.

You, sir, are irrational.

I actually agree with that. Once you agree to civil unions, you have compromised any principle against gay marriage.

 

[bripat9643]

The left does not care about social justice. It cares about power.

That is why no truce is possible with the left.

Precisely.

But, you claim you are a liberal...

No, I am liberal by classic definition, as were the Founders. I am not "a liberal" in the modern sense by any standard.

So you're a Ford like the Model T is a Ford.

You're a liberal like Joseph Stalin was a liberal.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

The left does not care about social justice. It cares about power.

That is why no truce is possible with the left.

Precisely.

But, you claim you are a liberal...

No, I am liberal by classic definition, as were the Founders. I am not "a liberal" in the modern sense by any standard.

So you're a Ford like the Model T is a Ford.

You're a liberal like Joseph Stalin was a liberal.

Au contraire! I am not now, nor have I ever been a Democrat.

 

[Bfgrn]

But if someone is going to try to approriate our founding fathers as carrying the SAME beliefs, it then requires a burden of proof.

So, the Democrats will be providing that soon?

By the way, it's "appropriate", Your Brilliance. Try Spell-Check.

It's like ... right there.

That's all you got, a spelling error? Were you born anal retentive or raised that way?

 

[Bfgrn]

Precisely.

But, you claim you are a liberal...

No, I am liberal by classic definition, as were the Founders. I am not "a liberal" in the modern sense by any standard.

So you're a Ford like the Model T is a Ford.

You're a liberal like Joseph Stalin was a liberal.

Au contraire! I am not now, nor have I ever been a Democrat.

Stalin was the leader of the right wing of the communist party. Leon Trotsky was the leader of the left.

 

[Edgetho]

I actually agree with that. Once you agree to civil unions, you have compromised any principle against gay marriage.

Not true. Not true at all.

We can grant all the legal perquisites to a Civil Union that Married People have without calling it a Marriage and everybody's happy.

We could make special law for special circumstance so that same sex people would feel special and not thrown in with all us 'Married' breeders.

Which is what they call us. you know. Breeders

They have no respect for us, in case you're stupid and didn't know that. They don't want to be like us, they just want to spit in your face.

They are FAR more interested in breaking your toy simply because it's yours than they are in mending their own. They want to shit in your sandbox, not create one of their own.

dimocraps are some sick bitches. They seriously are.

You can NOT........... EVER judge dimocraps like you would normal humans.

They are neither. You do NOT want to understand them so -- Don't even try.

I do and, let me tell you. It's a dark place they live in. Very dark

 

[NYcarbineer]

The left does not care about social justice. It cares about power.

That is why no truce is possible with the left.

Precisely.

But, you claim you are a liberal...

No, I am liberal by classic definition, as were the Founders. I am not "a liberal" in the modern sense by any standard.

So you're a Ford like the Model T is a Ford.

You're a liberal like Joseph Stalin was a liberal.

You're an asshole without compare.