Abraham Lincoln was a Communist?

[TheCrusader]

Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Read more at Abraham Lincoln Quotes at BrainyQuote.com

It is hard to pinpoint Abraham Lincoln's economic leanings, but one thing is clear. Republicans today hate Lincoln and his pro-Black, anti-Capitalist, private-property stealing, big government policies.

Lincoln's party was responsible for the largest growth of Federal Government in US history, whether it was from building Railways and Canals, to confiscating Plantation owner land and giving it to former slaves (do you think after the slaves are freed the former slave holder should also be forced to surrender some of their land?!)

Lincoln's policies also created the largest land-give-away in history such that 75% of American households owned their own property by 1890.

Of course, the Southern/Conservative counter-revolution has all but destroyed the US middle class created by Lincoln's liberals and the eventual Progressive Democrat movement.

Why then do I say Lincoln was a communist?

Well it's simple.

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It's not necessarily Marxist, but that is not what I am claiming.

What Lincoln believed was that Capital belongs to the person who worked to create it, not to the person who owned it because a piece of paper says so.

 

[Moonglow]

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It was a statement long, long before Marx was born....It's even in the Bible..

 

[TheCrusader]

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It was a statement long, long before Marx was born....It's even in the Bible..

Yes in fact it is. But not many people know what Lincoln actually stood for because his entire Presidency and debates are clouded by the Civil War.

 

[Rustic]

Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Read more at Abraham Lincoln Quotes at BrainyQuote.com

It is hard to pinpoint Abraham Lincoln's economic leanings, but one thing is clear. Republicans today hate Lincoln and his pro-Black, anti-Capitalist, private-property stealing, big government policies.

Lincoln's party was responsible for the largest growth of Federal Government in US history, whether it was from building Railways and Canals, to confiscating Plantation owner land and giving it to former slaves (do you think after the slaves are freed the former slave holder should also be forced to surrender some of their land?!)

Lincoln's policies also created the largest land-give-away in history such that 75% of American households owned their own property by 1890.

Of course, the Southern/Conservative counter-revolution has all but destroyed the US middle class created by Lincoln's liberals and the eventual Progressive Democrat movement.

Why then do I say Lincoln was a communist?

Well it's simple.

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It's not necessarily Marxist, but that is not what I am claiming.

What Lincoln believed was that Capital belongs to the person who worked to create it, not to the person who owned it because a piece of paper says so.

 

[Rustic]

He suspended habeas corpus which is absolutely unacceptable...

 

[initforme]

He was a socialist. He believed black peoples labor was subject to pay. The south disagreed.

 

[Rustic]

He was a socialist. He believed black peoples labor was subject to pay. The south disagreed.

There is nothing good about being an socialist...

 

[RandallFlagg]

Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Read more at Abraham Lincoln Quotes at BrainyQuote.com

It is hard to pinpoint Abraham Lincoln's economic leanings, but one thing is clear. Republicans today hate Lincoln and his pro-Black, anti-Capitalist, private-property stealing, big government policies.

Lincoln's party was responsible for the largest growth of Federal Government in US history, whether it was from building Railways and Canals, to confiscating Plantation owner land and giving it to former slaves (do you think after the slaves are freed the former slave holder should also be forced to surrender some of their land?!)

Lincoln's policies also created the largest land-give-away in history such that 75% of American households owned their own property by 1890.

Of course, the Southern/Conservative counter-revolution has all but destroyed the US middle class created by Lincoln's liberals and the eventual Progressive Democrat movement.

Why then do I say Lincoln was a communist?

Well it's simple.

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It's not necessarily Marxist, but that is not what I am claiming.

What Lincoln believed was that Capital belongs to the person who worked to create it, not to the person who owned it because a piece of paper says so.

You know sonny, I worked in Moscow during the 80s. It's funny that you would include that statement because I (literally) saw thousands of Russians that were nearly always on the verge of starvation from their communist government. Too bad they weren't allowed to keep the "fruits of their labor".....isn't it.

Not to mention the nearly 5 million Russians who were murdered by Stalin....too bad they weren't allowed to "keep their fruits"

I used to stand in the window of my apartment in Moscow and watch the babushkas standing in bread lines - praying to God that they didn't run out BEFORE they got to them.


Yes Sir - communism = good times.

 

[Kosh]

He was a socialist. He believed black peoples labor was subject to pay. The south disagreed.

Oh the silly far left drones and their religious narratives not connected to reality..

 

[Kosh]

He suspended habeas corpus which is absolutely unacceptable...

Obama has done away with "Due Process" and the far left is ok with it!

 

[TheCrusader]

Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Read more at Abraham Lincoln Quotes at BrainyQuote.com

It is hard to pinpoint Abraham Lincoln's economic leanings, but one thing is clear. Republicans today hate Lincoln and his pro-Black, anti-Capitalist, private-property stealing, big government policies.

Lincoln's party was responsible for the largest growth of Federal Government in US history, whether it was from building Railways and Canals, to confiscating Plantation owner land and giving it to former slaves (do you think after the slaves are freed the former slave holder should also be forced to surrender some of their land?!)

Lincoln's policies also created the largest land-give-away in history such that 75% of American households owned their own property by 1890.

Of course, the Southern/Conservative counter-revolution has all but destroyed the US middle class created by Lincoln's liberals and the eventual Progressive Democrat movement.

Why then do I say Lincoln was a communist?

Well it's simple.

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It's not necessarily Marxist, but that is not what I am claiming.

What Lincoln believed was that Capital belongs to the person who worked to create it, not to the person who owned it because a piece of paper says so.

You know sonny, I worked in Moscow during the 80s. It's funny that you would include that statement because I (literally) saw thousands of Russians that were nearly always on the verge of starvation from their communist government. Too bad they weren't allowed to keep the "fruits of their labor".....isn't it.

Not to mention the nearly 5 million Russians who were murdered by Stalin....too bad they weren't allowed to "keep their fruits"

I used to stand in the window of my apartment in Moscow and watch the babushkas standing in bread lines - praying to God that they didn't run out BEFORE they got to them.


Yes Sir - communism = good times.

Stalin didn't murder Russians but Ukranians because of their uprisings against central government and himself was a Fascist, and the Russians in the 1980s weren't "starving", there was a bread shortage after Chernobyl due to a World Wide Wheat Embargo placed upon the USSR at the time.

You don't know much about Russian history, or you're just a liar.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Read more at Abraham Lincoln Quotes at BrainyQuote.com

It is hard to pinpoint Abraham Lincoln's economic leanings, but one thing is clear. Republicans today hate Lincoln and his pro-Black, anti-Capitalist, private-property stealing, big government policies.

Lincoln's party was responsible for the largest growth of Federal Government in US history, whether it was from building Railways and Canals, to confiscating Plantation owner land and giving it to former slaves (do you think after the slaves are freed the former slave holder should also be forced to surrender some of their land?!)

Lincoln's policies also created the largest land-give-away in history such that 75% of American households owned their own property by 1890.

Of course, the Southern/Conservative counter-revolution has all but destroyed the US middle class created by Lincoln's liberals and the eventual Progressive Democrat movement.

Why then do I say Lincoln was a communist?

Well it's simple.

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It's not necessarily Marxist, but that is not what I am claiming.

What Lincoln believed was that Capital belongs to the person who worked to create it, not to the person who owned it because a piece of paper says so.

You know sonny, I worked in Moscow during the 80s. It's funny that you would include that statement because I (literally) saw thousands of Russians that were nearly always on the verge of starvation from their communist government. Too bad they weren't allowed to keep the "fruits of their labor".....isn't it.

Not to mention the nearly 5 million Russians who were murdered by Stalin....too bad they weren't allowed to "keep their fruits"

I used to stand in the window of my apartment in Moscow and watch the babushkas standing in bread lines - praying to God that they didn't run out BEFORE they got to them.


Yes Sir - communism = good times.

Stalin didn't murder Russians, and the Russians in the 1980s weren't "starving", there was a bread shortage after Chernobyl due to a World Wide Wheat Embargo placed upon the USSR at the time.

You don't know much about Russian history, or you're just a liar.

Stalin didn't murder Russians? Say what?

 

[TheCrusader]

He suspended habeas corpus which is absolutely unacceptable...

Keep hating the most popular American President.

That's why most Americans hate you and your political party.

 

[initforme]

All slave owners were scum. Not debatable.

 

[TheCrusader]

Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Read more at Abraham Lincoln Quotes at BrainyQuote.com

It is hard to pinpoint Abraham Lincoln's economic leanings, but one thing is clear. Republicans today hate Lincoln and his pro-Black, anti-Capitalist, private-property stealing, big government policies.

Lincoln's party was responsible for the largest growth of Federal Government in US history, whether it was from building Railways and Canals, to confiscating Plantation owner land and giving it to former slaves (do you think after the slaves are freed the former slave holder should also be forced to surrender some of their land?!)

Lincoln's policies also created the largest land-give-away in history such that 75% of American households owned their own property by 1890.

Of course, the Southern/Conservative counter-revolution has all but destroyed the US middle class created by Lincoln's liberals and the eventual Progressive Democrat movement.

Why then do I say Lincoln was a communist?

Well it's simple.

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It's not necessarily Marxist, but that is not what I am claiming.

What Lincoln believed was that Capital belongs to the person who worked to create it, not to the person who owned it because a piece of paper says so.

You know sonny, I worked in Moscow during the 80s. It's funny that you would include that statement because I (literally) saw thousands of Russians that were nearly always on the verge of starvation from their communist government. Too bad they weren't allowed to keep the "fruits of their labor".....isn't it.

Not to mention the nearly 5 million Russians who were murdered by Stalin....too bad they weren't allowed to "keep their fruits"

I used to stand in the window of my apartment in Moscow and watch the babushkas standing in bread lines - praying to God that they didn't run out BEFORE they got to them.


Yes Sir - communism = good times.

Stalin didn't murder Russians, and the Russians in the 1980s weren't "starving", there was a bread shortage after Chernobyl due to a World Wide Wheat Embargo placed upon the USSR at the time.

You don't know much about Russian history, or you're just a liar.

Stalin didn't murder Russians? Say what?

Are Ukrainians now Russians? Do you people have any specificity in your garbage talking points?

Do you even know how to communicate accurately?

 

[Rustic]

He suspended habeas corpus which is absolutely unacceptable...

Keep hating the most popular American President.

That's why most Americans hate you and your political party.

You don't know much at all about Abraham Lincoln, do you??

 

[RandallFlagg]

Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Read more at Abraham Lincoln Quotes at BrainyQuote.com

It is hard to pinpoint Abraham Lincoln's economic leanings, but one thing is clear. Republicans today hate Lincoln and his pro-Black, anti-Capitalist, private-property stealing, big government policies.

Lincoln's party was responsible for the largest growth of Federal Government in US history, whether it was from building Railways and Canals, to confiscating Plantation owner land and giving it to former slaves (do you think after the slaves are freed the former slave holder should also be forced to surrender some of their land?!)

Lincoln's policies also created the largest land-give-away in history such that 75% of American households owned their own property by 1890.

Of course, the Southern/Conservative counter-revolution has all but destroyed the US middle class created by Lincoln's liberals and the eventual Progressive Democrat movement.

Why then do I say Lincoln was a communist?

Well it's simple.

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It's not necessarily Marxist, but that is not what I am claiming.

What Lincoln believed was that Capital belongs to the person who worked to create it, not to the person who owned it because a piece of paper says so.

You know sonny, I worked in Moscow during the 80s. It's funny that you would include that statement because I (literally) saw thousands of Russians that were nearly always on the verge of starvation from their communist government. Too bad they weren't allowed to keep the "fruits of their labor".....isn't it.

Not to mention the nearly 5 million Russians who were murdered by Stalin....too bad they weren't allowed to "keep their fruits"

I used to stand in the window of my apartment in Moscow and watch the babushkas standing in bread lines - praying to God that they didn't run out BEFORE they got to them.


Yes Sir - communism = good times.

Stalin didn't murder Russians but Ukranians because of their uprisings against central government and himself was a Fascist, and the Russians in the 1980s weren't "starving", there was a bread shortage after Chernobyl due to a World Wide Wheat Embargo placed upon the USSR at the time.

You don't know much about Russian history, or you're just a liar.

Oh dear God......


How Many People Did Joseph Stalin Kill?


Grow up sonny

 

[RandallFlagg]

Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Read more at Abraham Lincoln Quotes at BrainyQuote.com

It is hard to pinpoint Abraham Lincoln's economic leanings, but one thing is clear. Republicans today hate Lincoln and his pro-Black, anti-Capitalist, private-property stealing, big government policies.

Lincoln's party was responsible for the largest growth of Federal Government in US history, whether it was from building Railways and Canals, to confiscating Plantation owner land and giving it to former slaves (do you think after the slaves are freed the former slave holder should also be forced to surrender some of their land?!)

Lincoln's policies also created the largest land-give-away in history such that 75% of American households owned their own property by 1890.

Of course, the Southern/Conservative counter-revolution has all but destroyed the US middle class created by Lincoln's liberals and the eventual Progressive Democrat movement.

Why then do I say Lincoln was a communist?

Well it's simple.

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It's not necessarily Marxist, but that is not what I am claiming.

What Lincoln believed was that Capital belongs to the person who worked to create it, not to the person who owned it because a piece of paper says so.

You know sonny, I worked in Moscow during the 80s. It's funny that you would include that statement because I (literally) saw thousands of Russians that were nearly always on the verge of starvation from their communist government. Too bad they weren't allowed to keep the "fruits of their labor".....isn't it.

Not to mention the nearly 5 million Russians who were murdered by Stalin....too bad they weren't allowed to "keep their fruits"

I used to stand in the window of my apartment in Moscow and watch the babushkas standing in bread lines - praying to God that they didn't run out BEFORE they got to them.


Yes Sir - communism = good times.

Stalin didn't murder Russians, and the Russians in the 1980s weren't "starving", there was a bread shortage after Chernobyl due to a World Wide Wheat Embargo placed upon the USSR at the time.

You don't know much about Russian history, or you're just a liar.

Stalin didn't murder Russians? Say what?

Are Ukrainians now Russians? Do you people have any specificity in your garbage talking points?

Do you even know how to communicate accurately?

Sonny - you need an education. Your public school teachers screwed you over.....

 

[Moonglow]

He suspended habeas corpus which is absolutely unacceptable...

Obama has done away with "Due Process" and the far left is ok with it!

It started way before Oblama, Reagan did us a good number...

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Labor is prior to, and independent of, capital. Capital is only the fruit of labor, and could never have existed if labor had not first existed. Labor is the superior of capital, and deserves much the higher consideration.
Read more at Abraham Lincoln Quotes at BrainyQuote.com

It is hard to pinpoint Abraham Lincoln's economic leanings, but one thing is clear. Republicans today hate Lincoln and his pro-Black, anti-Capitalist, private-property stealing, big government policies.

Lincoln's party was responsible for the largest growth of Federal Government in US history, whether it was from building Railways and Canals, to confiscating Plantation owner land and giving it to former slaves (do you think after the slaves are freed the former slave holder should also be forced to surrender some of their land?!)

Lincoln's policies also created the largest land-give-away in history such that 75% of American households owned their own property by 1890.

Of course, the Southern/Conservative counter-revolution has all but destroyed the US middle class created by Lincoln's liberals and the eventual Progressive Democrat movement.

Why then do I say Lincoln was a communist?

Well it's simple.

Lincoln believed that if a person worked, they were entitled to own the fruits of their labor, and this is a directly communist statement.

It's not necessarily Marxist, but that is not what I am claiming.

What Lincoln believed was that Capital belongs to the person who worked to create it, not to the person who owned it because a piece of paper says so.

You know sonny, I worked in Moscow during the 80s. It's funny that you would include that statement because I (literally) saw thousands of Russians that were nearly always on the verge of starvation from their communist government. Too bad they weren't allowed to keep the "fruits of their labor".....isn't it.

Not to mention the nearly 5 million Russians who were murdered by Stalin....too bad they weren't allowed to "keep their fruits"

I used to stand in the window of my apartment in Moscow and watch the babushkas standing in bread lines - praying to God that they didn't run out BEFORE they got to them.


Yes Sir - communism = good times.

Stalin didn't murder Russians, and the Russians in the 1980s weren't "starving", there was a bread shortage after Chernobyl due to a World Wide Wheat Embargo placed upon the USSR at the time.

You don't know much about Russian history, or you're just a liar.

Stalin didn't murder Russians? Say what?

Are Ukrainians now Russians? Do you people have any specificity in your garbage talking points?

Do you even know how to communicate accurately?

I know millions died under Stalin. That's just a fact