Abortions - The Truth - The Killing of Unborn Children

Discussion in 'Religion and Ethics' started by 007, Dec 9, 2005.

  1. 007
    Offline

    007 Charter Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    May 8, 2004
    Messages:
    38,545
    Thanks Received:
    7,907
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +12,127
    How can anyone, with straight face, say that abortion is ANYTHING BUT, the LEGAL, WHOLESALE SLAUGHTER of the unborn? If a 16 year old girl who gives secret birth to a child, and then dumps it down a trash shoot can be charged with "murder", then why aren't abortionist charged with the same thing?

    Now take a GOOD LOOK at the REALITY of ABORTION. However.....​

    *WARNING*

    The images on this website are VERY GRAPHIC. DO NOT view unless you have the stomach for it....

    http://www.christiangallery.com/smdead.html
     
  2. archangel
    Online

    archangel Guest

    Ratings:
    +0

    Appears in one picture that organ harvesting was apparent..abdomen and chest cavity split open...this is outrageous and a true abomination...If people cannot see pain in these pictures...well they are just pure and simply callous to say the least!
     
  3. KarlMarx
    Offline

    KarlMarx Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Thanks Received:
    490
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    ...
    Ratings:
    +491
    I'm not even going to that site. I have to admit, I'm pretty squeamish about things like that. I watched "Night and the Fog", a documentary about the Holocaust, during my 11th grade History class and had nightmares about it for weeks.

    But, Pale is right. Legalized abortion is an abomination, not just on moral and ethical grounds, but on legal ones as well.

    I've pontificated at other times how Roe vs. Wade violates the Constitution, how it denies the right of voters to decide whether to allow it, how it denies legal protections for unborn persons, and how it treats the unborn person as nothing more than the property of its mother to dispose of or keep as she sees fit.

    The argument many pro-abortionists make that legalized abortion prevents women from turning coat hangers on themselves or going to back alley butchers is debatable at best and more likely not true.

    I once visited a site that showed a graph of the number of deaths due to abortions over the years. Contrary to the claims of abortionists, the number of deaths due to abortions dramatically decreased during the 1940s then gradually decreased until the time of Roe vs. Wade in 1973. How could this be? After all, abortion wasn't legal in any state until 1966 and not legal in all states until 1973. The answer is "penicillin". The government found a way to mass produce penicillin during World War II because massive amounts were needed to save soldier's lives out in the field. As a result, penicillin became more widely available and women who had "back alley abortions" did not die of infection.

    According to statistics, about 1,700 women died from illegal abortions in 1940,. The trend was steadily downward from then onward, 316 died in 1950, 289 in 1960,128 in 1970, and 39 in 1972, the year before Roe vs Wade. All of this can be attributable to advances in medicine. There is no reason to believe that, if abortion were again made illegal, hundreds or thousands of women would die each year.

    So, for the sake of a couple of dozen lives we kill over a million unborn persons.
     
  4. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +620
    This guy is a f’ing wacko. There’s no telling if what he posts is fact or intentionally misleading.

    After you find out who and what this guy is I don’t think you’ll support or reference his site. It sure doesn’t help the anti cause to associate with such people.



    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neal_Horsley
     
  5. Abbey Normal
    Offline

    Abbey Normal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    4,825
    Thanks Received:
    391
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mid-Atlantic region
    Ratings:
    +391
    Whatever the beliefs of the author of the site, the truth about abortion is the truth. Hard to stomach, isn't it?

    Pale, once again, I thank you for an awesome post. I will try to rep you.
     
  6. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +620
    The point of my post is, with this guy you really don't know if what he posts is true given his background and tactics. Even the anti crowd have rejected him..
    www.http://archive.salon.com/news/feature/2002/06/21/abortion/index_np.html

    I guess your saying you support this guy. Right?
     
  7. KarlMarx
    Offline

    KarlMarx Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Thanks Received:
    490
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    ...
    Ratings:
    +491
    No, he isn't. The point is that abortion is a travesty. Sure, there are people in the anti-abortion crowd that are nuts.... and there sure are a lot of them in the pro-abortion crowd, too.

    If Adolph Hitler once said "It snows in Germany during January" would the fact that one of the most evil persons of the 20th century made that statement make it untrue? Of course not!
     
  8. Abbey Normal
    Offline

    Abbey Normal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    4,825
    Thanks Received:
    391
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mid-Atlantic region
    Ratings:
    +391
    Doesn't sound like anyone you quoted is challenging the truth about abortion, just his tactics and possible ties with violent groups. And if you think that I support this guy from what I wrote, you must need some coffee before reading. :cof:

    You don't have to face the truth if you don't want to. No one can make you.
     
  9. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +620
    No, he isn't what? A wacko or terrorist..He's listed as such. Along with with;Rudolph, Eric Robert...
    http://www.tkb.org/KeyLeader.jsp?memID=29
     
  10. KarlMarx
    Offline

    KarlMarx Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Thanks Received:
    490
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    ...
    Ratings:
    +491
    In response to your question to Abbey Normal

    By "No, he isn't", I meant .... "No [Abbey Normal] isn't [saying that he supports this guy]"

    (or is Abbey Normal a she? If AN is a she instead of a he, I apologize!)
     

Share This Page