Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
CDZ Abortion: Moral or Immoral
- Thread starter Bonzi
- Start date
No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
The question is an honest one but let me rephrase it. What is it about a human life that makes us value it more than we value other animals?well besides the one you just cited they are many and I am sure you know most, or at least I would hope you do...to name them would be folly for answering your question if you have already made up your mind that you do not see a difference between an animal and a human life and couldn't care less how great the difference is.What's the difference between a human, whose life we value, and an animal we can kill for any reason we choose?
History.No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
Says who?
I'd say we conform our morality to the society for the benefits we get, not solely for the punishment we receive. We in the US have come to regard racism as an evil. Not everyone I know but it is the majority opinion I think. There is no punishment for racist thinking but, at least in my circles, racists would be ostracized.History.No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
Says who?
not good enough. We all have our own internal moral code. We follow laws only to avoid jail or punishment
The Sage of Main Street
Gold Member
If You've Heard of Someone, Don't Listen to HimAbortion just won't fit into a yes/no category. Generally, it is immoral; however, in cases of rape, incest, and the life of the mother, non-abortion may be even more immoral. In any case, I am deeply skeptical about making a government (legal) decision. Women's bodies aren't state property.What's you position, and why?
If abortion is immoral, it is also immoral in the cases of rape, incest, and saving the life of the "mother." Neither your power-hungry preachers nor their power-hungry opponents bring that up. Those ambitious imbeciles have no right to dominate the public forum on any issue at all. The truth is forced to hide in the shadows of the artificial light shone on the pompous morons the ruling class picks as the only two choices we are brainwashed to follow.
The Sage of Main Street
Gold Member
Boasting BotsI'd say we conform our morality to the society for the benefits we get, not solely for the punishment we receive. We in the US have come to regard racism as an evil. Not everyone I know but it is the majority opinion I think. There is no punishment for racist thinking but, at least in my circles, racists would be ostracized.History.No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
Says who?
not good enough. We all have our own internal moral code. We follow laws only to avoid jail or punishment
Race traitors are brainwashed by the degenerate media and don't have what should be called "opinions" any more than ventriloquists' puppets have them. You are inanimate.
No offense, but you sir, are a moron. Thankfully an anachronism.Boasting Bots
Race traitors are brainwashed by the degenerate media and don't have what should be called "opinions" any more than ventriloquists' puppets have them. You are inanimate.
The Sage of Main Street
Gold Member
What's the difference between a person and a human? This may be the disconnect.
Not sure what makes a living human being less human for the simple fact that it is nourished by their mother inside her body instead of outside of it
Another Point the Ruling-Class Tyranny Never Allows to Be Brought Up
The Catholic Church views sperm cells, or at least the one that is predestined by God to fertilize, as living human beings. So why don't you argue against that opinion with a devout Catholic and see what it feels like to be Pro Choice?
No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
Like the moral aspect of defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Right?
Wry Catcher
Diamond Member
- Banned
- #233
What's you position, and why?
amoral, a medical procedure based on a number of variables, i.e. the health of the fetus, the health of the mother, the circumstance of the pregnancy, the law, etc.
What's you position, and why?
amoral, a medical procedure based on a number of variables, i.e. the health of the fetus, the health of the mother, the circumstance of the pregnancy, the law, etc.
With full acknowledgement of the fact that there are moral components to things like laws and medical decisions. . . I agree. In many cases, the procedure itself is "amoral."
Exactly. In many cultures it is defined as one man and many women. Were these cultures evil?No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
Like the moral aspect of defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Right?
Exactly. In many cultures it is defined as one man and many women. Were these cultures evil?No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
Like the moral aspect of defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Right?
You are making mine and Bonzi's point.
The answer to your question depends largely on who you ask.
Our "society," through a democratic process, decided that marriage is defined as "one man one woman." This was decided by majorities in several States and still, a minority of activists with enough left leaning judges have managed to change that definition. . . DESPITE the majority moral views of our society. So, clearly those who demand and support "gay marriage" do not get their "morality" from the society in which they live.
On the contrary, it is America that has changed.Exactly. In many cultures it is defined as one man and many women. Were these cultures evil?No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
Like the moral aspect of defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Right?
You are making mine and Bonzi's point.
The answer to your question depends largely on who you ask.
Our "society," through a democratic process, decided that marriage is defined as "one man one woman." This was decided by majorities in several States and still, a minority of activists with enough left leaning judges have managed to change that definition. . . DESPITE the majority moral views of our society. So, clearly those who demand and support "gay marriage" do not get their "morality" from the society in which they live.
In Pew Research Center polling in 2001, Americans opposed same-sex marriage by a margin of 57% to 35%.
Since then, support for same-sex marriage has steadily grown. And today, support for same-sex marriage is at its highest point since Pew Research Center began polling on this issue. Based on polling in 2017, a majority of Americans (62%) support same-sex marriage, while 32% oppose it.
On the contrary, it is America that has changed.Exactly. In many cultures it is defined as one man and many women. Were these cultures evil?No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
Like the moral aspect of defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Right?
You are making mine and Bonzi's point.
The answer to your question depends largely on who you ask.
Our "society," through a democratic process, decided that marriage is defined as "one man one woman." This was decided by majorities in several States and still, a minority of activists with enough left leaning judges have managed to change that definition. . . DESPITE the majority moral views of our society. So, clearly those who demand and support "gay marriage" do not get their "morality" from the society in which they live.
In Pew Research Center polling in 2001, Americans opposed same-sex marriage by a margin of 57% to 35%.
Since then, support for same-sex marriage has steadily grown. And today, support for same-sex marriage is at its highest point since Pew Research Center began polling on this issue. Based on polling in 2017, a majority of Americans (62%) support same-sex marriage, while 32% oppose it.
Yeah, that explains why the courts had to be used to overturn the State laws, alright.
The polls had Hitlary winning the election by a landslide too.
Bonzi
Diamond Member
- May 17, 2015
- 43,036
- 16,016
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #239
What's perceived by some as, not sure evil, put perhaps, discriminatory, to not permit same sex to get married. It's the exclusivity to man/woman only they find issue withExactly. In many cultures it is defined as one man and many women. Were these cultures evil?No, morality is set by the society/culture in which you live.To me, morals at self defined
Like the moral aspect of defining marriage as being between one man and one woman. Right?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 306
- Replies
- 80
- Views
- 906
- Replies
- 347
- Views
- 3K
- Replies
- 29
- Views
- 286
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8040
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-