Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes abortion is "there for a reason". It's there to kill babies. You have a point?
This country wouldn't have abortion mills if a law hadn't been passed against the will of the people that allowed them to be established.
I'm not going anywhere. It's the duty of those of us who value human life to stand against human rights violations.
Abortion was as common as apple pie before Roe v. Wade.
You can not fix stupid.
We do not live in a country of "the will of the people".
Amazing how ignorant Americans are. They believe we live in a majority rule rah rah club.
The Constitution stands on the doctrine of limited government and the RIGHTS OF THE INDIVIDUAL.
Roe v Wade is no longer the precedent case. The new standard is Planned Parenthood v Casey.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The case they did reaffirm some of the theoretical foundations of Roe v. Wade.
Planned Parenthood is complicit in each and every one of these incidents of rape and incest. They have actively covered up numerous crimes and counseled young girls on how to answer questions so that the criminal perpetrators don't get caught. When this happens, each and every person complict in these abhorrent acts should be prosecuted exactly as the rapist themselves.
Roe v Wade is no longer the precedent case. The new standard is Planned Parenthood v Casey.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The case they did reaffirm some of the theoretical foundations of Roe v. Wade.
Roe v Wade is no longer the precedent case. The new standard is Planned Parenthood v Casey.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The case they did reaffirm some of the theoretical foundations of Roe v. Wade.
Actually the Casey Court reaffirmed the right to privacy, as expressed in Griswold and applied in Roe. In Casey the undue burden standard was established.
And yet again the issue is not abortion, but privacy rights and the wisdom of the courts, in the context of the rule of law, to place restrictions on the state in its effort to address the social issue of abortion. An outright ban is no remedy.
The plurality then overturned the strict trimester formula used in Roe to weigh the woman's interest in obtaining an abortion against the State's interest in the life of the fetus. Continuing advancements in medical technology meant that at the time Casey was decided, a fetus might be considered viable at 22 or 23 weeks rather than at the 28 weeks that was more common at the time of Roe. The plurality recognized viability as the point at which the state interest in the life of the fetus outweighs the rights of the woman and abortion may be banned entirely "except where it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother".
A finding of an undue burden is a shorthand for the conclusion that a state regulation has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus. A statute with this purpose is invalid because the means chosen by the State to further the interest in potential life must be calculated to inform the woman's free choice, not hinder it. And a statute which, while furthering the interest in potential life or some other valid state interest, has the effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman's choice cannot be considered a permissible means of serving its legitimate ends. To the extent that the opinions of the Court or of individual Justices use the undue burden standard in a manner that is inconsistent with this analysis, we set out what, in our view, should be the
Yes abortion is "there for a reason". It's there to kill babies. You have a point?
Why not bitch at guys having a wank?
They kill MILLIONS of babies at once.
And you are saying that all rape victims should have that child and be reminded every day of their life about the rape that happened and possibly have a child that is abused and doesn't know why?
Yes abortion is "there for a reason". It's there to kill babies. You have a point?
Why not bitch at guys having a wank?
They kill MILLIONS of babies at once.
And you are saying that all rape victims should have that child and be reminded every day of their life about the rape that happened and possibly have a child that is abused and doesn't know why?
Again for the retarded:
1. Abortion does not eliminate the memory of rape.
2. There is zero evidence that abortion prevents abuse. In fact, the idea that it could is a logical fallacy in and of itself. You can't abuse a non-existent child. The truth is, child abuse has increased exponentially since the advent of legalized abortion. This has been pointed out ad nauseum.
3. I have no idea what a wank is, I assume you're just being an idiot...
Roe v Wade is no longer the precedent case. The new standard is Planned Parenthood v Casey.
Planned Parenthood v. Casey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The case they did reaffirm some of the theoretical foundations of Roe v. Wade.
Actually the Casey Court reaffirmed the right to privacy, as expressed in Griswold and applied in Roe. In Casey the undue burden standard was established.
And yet again the issue is not abortion, but privacy rights and the wisdom of the courts, in the context of the rule of law, to place restrictions on the state in its effort to address the social issue of abortion. An outright ban is no remedy.
Planned Parenthood v Casey overturned the 'trimester' approach and instituted the 'viable fetus' standard.
The plurality then overturned the strict trimester formula used in Roe to weigh the woman's interest in obtaining an abortion against the State's interest in the life of the fetus. Continuing advancements in medical technology meant that at the time Casey was decided, a fetus might be considered viable at 22 or 23 weeks rather than at the 28 weeks that was more common at the time of Roe. The plurality recognized viability as the point at which the state interest in the life of the fetus outweighs the rights of the woman and abortion may be banned entirely "except where it is necessary, in appropriate medical judgment, for the preservation of the life or health of the mother".
Planned Parenthood v. Casey - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
From the actual opinion:
A finding of an undue burden is a shorthand for the conclusion that a state regulation has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking an abortion of a nonviable fetus. A statute with this purpose is invalid because the means chosen by the State to further the interest in potential life must be calculated to inform the woman's free choice, not hinder it. And a statute which, while furthering the interest in potential life or some other valid state interest, has the effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman's choice cannot be considered a permissible means of serving its legitimate ends. To the extent that the opinions of the Court or of individual Justices use the undue burden standard in a manner that is inconsistent with this analysis, we set out what, in our view, should be the
And here it is if you would like to brush up a bit:
FindLaw | Cases and Codes
Yes abortion is "there for a reason". It's there to kill babies. You have a point?
Why not bitch at guys having a wank?
They kill MILLIONS of babies at once.
And you are saying that all rape victims should have that child and be reminded every day of their life about the rape that happened and possibly have a child that is abused and doesn't know why?
Again for the retarded:
1. Abortion does not eliminate the memory of rape.
2. There is zero evidence that abortion prevents abuse. In fact, the idea that it could is a logical fallacy in and of itself. You can't abuse a non-existent child. The truth is, child abuse has increased exponentially since the advent of legalized abortion. This has been pointed out ad nauseum.
3. I have no idea what a wank is, I assume you're just being an idiot...
