Abortion is a racist cause

Discussion in 'Conspiracy Theories' started by AllieBaba, Jan 27, 2009.

  1. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    Always has been, always will be.

    The modern day abortion rights movement began as the American Birth Control League in 1921. Among its founding board members were Margaret Sanger, Lothrup Stoddard, and C. C. Little. The latter two people were known for their racist views, but Margaret Sanger continually shows up in the company of other racists. In fact, she was the guest speaker at a Ku Klux Klan rally in Silverlake, N. J. in 1926.[1] Not only did she not disassociate herself from these racist views, her own writings leave little doubt as to her sympathies. In implementing a plan called the "Negro Project," that was designed to sterilize Blacks and reduce the number of Black children being born in the south, Sanger wrote: "[We propose to] hire three or four colored ministers, preferably with social-service backgrounds, and with engaging personalities. The most successful educational approach to the Negro is through a religious appeal. And we do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members." [2] Abortion - A Liberal Cause? (Margaret Sanger and Eugenics)

    Gosh, what does that sound like? Oh yeah, funding ABORTIONS in areas of the world that are...bothersome to us....and populated largely by blacks. How odd! How amazing!

    "There is but one practical and feasible program in handling the great problem of the feeble-minded. That is, as the best authorities are agreed, to prevent the birth of those who would transmit imbecility to their descendants. Feeble-mindedness as investigations and statistics from every country indicate, is invariably associated with an abnormally high rate of fertility. Modern conditions of civilization, as we are continually being reminded, furnish the most favorable breeding-ground for the mental defective, the moron, the imbecile. ``We protect the members of a weak strain,'' says Davenport, ``up to the period of reproduction, and then let them free upon the community, and encourage them to leave a large progeny of `feeble-minded': which in turn, protected from mortality and carefully nurtured up to the reproductive period, are again set free to reproduce, and so the stupid work goes on of preserving and increasing our socially unfit strains....

    I have touched upon these various aspects of the complex problem of the feeble-minded, and the menace of the moron to human society, not merely for the purpose of reiterating that it is one of the greatest and most difficult social problems of modern times, demanding an immediate, stern and definite policy, but because it illustrates the actual harvest of reliance upon traditional morality, upon the biblical injunction to increase and multiply, a policy still taught by politician, priest and militarist. Motherhood has been held universally sacred; yet, as Bouchacourt pointed out, ``to-day, the dregs of the human species, the blind, the deaf-mute, the degenerate, the nervous, the vicious, the idiotic, the imbecile, the cretins and the epileptics--are better protected than pregnant women.'' The syphilitic, the irresponsible, the feeble-minded are encouraged to breed unhindered, while all the powerful forces of tradition, of custom, or prejudice, have bolstered up the desperate effort to block the inevitable influence of true civilization in spreading the principles of independence, self-reliance, discrimination and foresight upon which the great practice of intelligent parenthood is based.

    "To-day we are confronted by the results of this official policy. There is no escaping it; there is no explaining it away. Surely it is an amazing and discouraging phenomenon that the very governments that have seen fit to interfere in practically every phase of the normal citizen's life, dare not attempt to restrain, either by force or persuasion, the moron and the imbecile from producing his large family of feeble-minded offspring...

    "The emergency problem of segregation and sterilization must be faced immediately. Every feeble-minded girl or woman of the hereditary type, especially of the moron class, should be segregated during the reproductive period. Otherwise, she is almost certain to bear imbecile children, who in turn are just as certain to breed other defectives. The male defectives are no less dangerous. Segregation carried out for one or two generations would give us only partial control of the problem. Moreover, when we realize that each feeble- minded person is a potential source of an endless progeny of defect, we prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded.

    "This, I say, is an emergency measure. But how are we to prevent the repetition in the future of a new harvest of imbecility, the recurrence of new generations of morons and defectives, as the logical and inevitable consequence of the universal application of the traditional and widely approved command to increase and multiply?...

    " Philanthropy and Charity: This is the present and traditional method of meeting the problems of human defect and dependence, of poverty and delinquency. It is emotional, altruistic, at best ameliorative, aiming to meet the individual situation as it arises and presents itself. Its effect in practise is seldom, if ever, truly preventive. Concerned with symptoms, with the allaying of acute and catastrophic miseries, it cannot, if it would, strike at the radical causes of social misery. At its worst, it is sentimental and paternalistic.

    Marxian Socialism: This may be considered typical of many widely varying schemes of more or less revolutionary social reconstruction, emphasizing the primary importance of environment, education, equal opportunity, and health, in the elimination of the conditions (i. e. capitalistic control of industry) which have resulted in biological chaos and human waste. I shall attempt to show that the Marxian doctrine is both too limited, too superficial and too fragmentary in its basic analysis of human nature and in its program of revolutionary reconstruction.

    Eugenics: Eugenics seems to me to be valuable in its critical and diagnostic aspects, in emphasizing the danger of irresponsible and uncontrolled fertility of the ``unfit'' and the feeble-minded establishing a progressive unbalance in human society and lowering the birth-rate among the ``fit.'' But in its so-called ``constructive'' aspect, in seeking to reestablish the dominance of healthy strain over the unhealthy, by urging an increased birth-rate among the fit, the Eugenists really offer nothing more farsighted than a ``cradle competition'' between the fit and the unfit. They suggest in very truth, that all intelligent and respectable parents should take as their example in this grave matter of child-bearing the most irresponsible elements in the community. "

    Sounds like a page out of the book of Jillian, KK, Ravi and Strolling.... but it's from "The Pivot of Civilization" by Margaret Sanger (Chapter 4).

    Can't wait to hear them re-iterate every lovely point of the above philosophy, while adamantly insisting it's the ones who don't want eugenics, who don't want genocide, and who have no interest in determining whose life is "more" valuable and whose life is "less" valuable and therefore expendable who are the judgmental, moralistic pigs.
     
  2. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    81,332
    Thanks Received:
    12,695
    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +29,778
    Yes, dear. And Hitler was a vegetarian so all vegetarians are Nazis.

    :cuckoo:
     
  3. strollingbones
    Offline

    strollingbones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,620
    Thanks Received:
    15,618
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    chicken farm
    Ratings:
    +31,922
    allie you dumb ass ...you got no clue to my views on abortion...now do you?
     
  4. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    Only the vegetarians who think it's okay to kill babies if they don't like the lifestyle or race of the moms.

    Get it yet? We're not talking about haircolor, you twit. We're talking about the basic understanding that it's okay to kill babies you judge to be less valuable than other babies.

    In other words, bringing your own morality into the government, using government money to weed out "undesirables" and saying that anyone who opposes is violating someone's rights...when the only rights being violated are those of the undesirables and the babies.
     
  5. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    THat has something to do with your garbled communications regarding the issue.
     
  6. Ravi
    Offline

    Ravi Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2008
    Messages:
    81,332
    Thanks Received:
    12,695
    Trophy Points:
    2,205
    Location:
    Hating Hatters
    Ratings:
    +29,778
    LOL! It's your side the currently wants to weed out undesirables...who was that idiot that advocated aborting all black fetuses?
     
  7. strollingbones
    Offline

    strollingbones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,620
    Thanks Received:
    15,618
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    chicken farm
    Ratings:
    +31,922
    btw allie ...do you believe that abortion is allowed under any circumstances...or do you believe in a total ban on abortion? tell us your view...in depth
     
  8. strollingbones
    Offline

    strollingbones Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2008
    Messages:
    65,620
    Thanks Received:
    15,618
    Trophy Points:
    2,190
    Location:
    chicken farm
    Ratings:
    +31,922

    please post my garbled communications on the abortion issue?
     
  9. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    It's a straw man. Abortion in every instance has never been illegal. Nobody has ever proposed that all women who become pregnant be "forced" to bear children if their health..physical or mental...is at risk. That's just a terror tactic used by the left. Just as they are continually trotting out the tried and true flag of "You want to force the victims of incest to bear monster children!".

    These events account for less than one percent of one percent of all abortions in the first place....although it's almost impossible to get anything even remotely intelligent regarding statistics from Planned Parenthood because they steadfastly refuse to answer to anyone or keep records. Just as they steadfastly refuse to report sexual predators and child molesters and rapists when they have victims of incest come through their doors, or hideously underaged girls. They protect those people, not those of us who want to do away with Planned Parenthood and abortion factories.

    I think anyone who is pregnant, barring health issues (and we're not talking about a baby with crooked teeth or webbed toes) should not be able to get an abortion. It's murder. I don't care who the mother is. Do you think killing your newborn child should be okay for some mothers, but considered murder for others? I don't. I think it's murder regardless of who the mother is.

    I don't blame the women who are brainwashed into thinking it's okay to get abortions, though. I blame the liberal propaganda machine that has taught girls from the cradle up that babies are non-entities, that they are not obligated in any way to life which begins, in whatever way, in their bodies. I have nothing but pity for women who fall for that garbage and get abortions, thinking it means nothing. It doesn't change their lives, they continue to live their lives. I've seen women with 6 children get abortion after abortion after abortion. How easy would it be just to put those babies up for adoption? Who would it hurt? Do you honestly think the comfort of a woman who has had 6 children with 5 different men is more important than the life of a child?

    Has comfort become more important than life?

    Of course it has.
     
  10. AllieBaba
    Offline

    AllieBaba BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2007
    Messages:
    33,778
    Thanks Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +3,650
    The Obama abortion thread...where you went off on some rant about my passing judgment on people with one child only.

    Garbled..and inaccurate.
     

Share This Page