Abortion And The Day Donald Trump Ran Away From Honesty As If His Hair Were On Fire

Discussion in 'USMB Breaking News' started by Martin Eden Mercury, Apr 9, 2016.

  1. Correll
    Offline

    Correll Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2015
    Messages:
    34,933
    Thanks Received:
    3,782
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Ratings:
    +20,036
    YOu misunderstand.

    My point was NOT to start a discussion on abortion, but to point out that the reporter and you CHOOSE to create and then focus on a minor incident of a flubbed question, that has already been dealt with, INSTEAD OF A serious discussion of his Abortion Position, and likely actions and impact on the issue.

    It's like you know that a serious and honest discussion will not serve your partisan purpose, so instead you decided to attempt to fearmonger by misrepresenting Trump's position and likely abortion law under Trump.
     
  2. Correll
    Offline

    Correll Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2015
    Messages:
    34,933
    Thanks Received:
    3,782
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Ratings:
    +20,036
    This is page 13 of this thread. We have been discussing your op for 13 pages.

    For to re post it NOW without any adjustment or addressing of the many challenges to your position on this incident, is the Logical Fallacy of Proof By Assertion.

    You are obviously using it as a form of dishonest propaganda.

    As a Logical Fallacy is an error in logic, your argument is revealed to be flawed and without merit.
     
  3. Martin Eden Mercury
    Offline

    Martin Eden Mercury VIP Member Op-ed Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2015
    Messages:
    897
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Location:
    United States of America
    Ratings:
    +426
    Somebody should clue you in to never, ever, use Trump's name in the same breath as fearmonger

    Donald Trump created the 'incident' when he opened his big fat mouth. We report, you decide. And you have decided to attack the messenger. Okay. Move on.
     
  4. Martin Eden Mercury
    Offline

    Martin Eden Mercury VIP Member Op-ed Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2015
    Messages:
    897
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Location:
    United States of America
    Ratings:
    +426
    Yep, obviously. Move long.
     
  5. asaratis
    Offline

    asaratis Uppity Senior Citizen Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2009
    Messages:
    12,665
    Thanks Received:
    2,756
    Trophy Points:
    260
    Location:
    Stockbridge
    Ratings:
    +5,098
    When you twist the 'report' with lies, it makes our decision much easier.
     
  6. Correll
    Offline

    Correll Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2015
    Messages:
    34,933
    Thanks Received:
    3,782
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Ratings:
    +20,036
    NOthing in your post addressed my point.

    Please try again.

    YOu misunderstand.

    My point was NOT to start a discussion on abortion, but to point out that the reporter and you CHOOSE to create and then focus on a minor incident of a flubbed question, that has already been dealt with, INSTEAD OF A serious discussion of his Abortion Position, and likely actions and impact on the issue.

    It's like you know that a serious and honest discussion will not serve your partisan purpose, so instead you decided to attempt to fearmonger by misrepresenting Trump's position and likely abortion law under Trump.
     
  7. Correll
    Offline

    Correll Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 2015
    Messages:
    34,933
    Thanks Received:
    3,782
    Trophy Points:
    1,170
    Ratings:
    +20,036
    YOu admit your argument is flawed and without merit?

    Well...

    I am impressed. Good for you.

    It is a very rare person, that when presented with clear evidence that their reasoning was flawed will admit it.

    Do you want to ask the mods to close this thread down, then?

    I will revise the low opinion I HAD been been building of you, upwards.


    :beer:
     
  8. Martin Eden Mercury
    Offline

    Martin Eden Mercury VIP Member Op-ed Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2015
    Messages:
    897
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Location:
    United States of America
    Ratings:
    +426
    If you want to suggest a transcript, and audio/video evidence of Trump saying what I said he said, is somehow a lie -- go for it.
     
  9. Martin Eden Mercury
    Offline

    Martin Eden Mercury VIP Member Op-ed Contributor

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2015
    Messages:
    897
    Thanks Received:
    106
    Trophy Points:
    80
    Location:
    United States of America
    Ratings:
    +426
    Flubbed? He answered honesty and then he and his handlers went and threw something to deflect, up on his web site. Trump's position is amateur, unclear, and ever changing depending on when and how he is asked a question
     
  10. eagle1462010
    Offline

    eagle1462010 Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2013
    Messages:
    22,880
    Thanks Received:
    5,170
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Ratings:
    +14,846
    Geesh.........here we go again.

    Mathews is a Liberal Hack...........who pushed a Hypothetical question of IF IT WERE BANNED should there be a punishment................

    I don't know about you, but usually BANNING something usually has consequences, which is what Trump was trying to say. He refused to give an answer because he realized he walked into Mathews little BS trap................

    Mathews badgered him during the whole exchange hardly ever letting Trump get a word in at all..........He had just been asked the question by the audience which BY NO MEANS was the one Mathews pushed forward.

    The law is clear.............States have the right to ban late term abortion. The argument for States to ban was accepted by the Supreme Court...........at least 41 states currently have late term abortion bans.............which would make it illegal for doctors to perform the abortion.

    The entire question is WHEN DOES LIFE BEGIN...........or WHEN IS BABY VIABLE..............In the 3rd trimester babies have a high survival rate and are fully formed in most cases.............so States across this country have passed laws to that time frame when the babies have higher survival rates.................

    That is the law.

    The question from Mathews was a set up HACK question as is the OP here doing the same.
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

content