A Whole New Industry is Born. Thanks Obama

[Vel]

"Are you a government that needs some ready cash? U.S pays cash fast to ransom citizens." This will be the newest ME T.V. commercial.
*****************************************************
$5M paid to buy freedom for rights workers held in Egypt
Published March 01, 2012
| FoxNews.com

CAIRO – Seven American rights workers are on a plane out of Egypt after the U.S. paid nearly $5 million in bail costs to secure their freedom.



Read more: $5M Paid To Buy Freedom For Rights Workers Held In Egypt | Fox News

 

[rdean]

Do you really want to see "hostage taking"?

Unemployment benefits: not until Bush tax cuts pass, Senate GOP says - CSMonitor.com

The lame-duck Congress, mired in a partisan clash over taxes and spending and preoccupied with a battle over extending the Bush tax cuts, refused Wednesday to restore federal financing of extended unemployment benefits, which had lapsed overnight.

The inaction means the imminent loss of unemployment compensation for some 800,000 out-of-work Americans, with nearly 2 million long-term unemployed expected to be affected by Jan. 1, according to the Labor Department.

---------------------------------------------

See? Obama extended the Bush tax cuts because millions of Americas were being held hostage. Now this isn't coming from some far left rag, but from the Christian Science Monitor. And, it was only a couple of years ago.

 

[Avorysuds]

The Government paying people to not work is not an industry.

 

[Vel]

Do you really want to see "hostage taking"?

Unemployment benefits: not until Bush tax cuts pass, Senate GOP says - CSMonitor.com

The lame-duck Congress, mired in a partisan clash over taxes and spending and preoccupied with a battle over extending the Bush tax cuts, refused Wednesday to restore federal financing of extended unemployment benefits, which had lapsed overnight.

The inaction means the imminent loss of unemployment compensation for some 800,000 out-of-work Americans, with nearly 2 million long-term unemployed expected to be affected by Jan. 1, according to the Labor Department.

---------------------------------------------

See? Obama extended the Bush tax cuts because millions of Americas were being held hostage. Now this isn't coming from some far left rag, but from the Christian Science Monitor. And, it was only a couple of years ago.

I'm sure that given the precedent set in Egypt, we'll see plenty more hostage taking. ( and yes, flat out ignoring your inane efforts to drag the topic back to Bush )

 

[rdean]

Do you really want to see "hostage taking"?

Unemployment benefits: not until Bush tax cuts pass, Senate GOP says - CSMonitor.com

The lame-duck Congress, mired in a partisan clash over taxes and spending and preoccupied with a battle over extending the Bush tax cuts, refused Wednesday to restore federal financing of extended unemployment benefits, which had lapsed overnight.

The inaction means the imminent loss of unemployment compensation for some 800,000 out-of-work Americans, with nearly 2 million long-term unemployed expected to be affected by Jan. 1, according to the Labor Department.

---------------------------------------------

See? Obama extended the Bush tax cuts because millions of Americas were being held hostage. Now this isn't coming from some far left rag, but from the Christian Science Monitor. And, it was only a couple of years ago.

I'm sure that given the precedent set in Egypt, we'll see plenty more hostage taking. ( and yes, flat out ignoring your inane efforts to drag the topic back to Bush )

How is that inane? We started all this violence in the Middle East with Iraq. If those regimes were supposed to fall, it would be their people that take them out. Not us. We didn't ask them to fight in our revolution.

It's not about Bush anyway. It's about the Republicans. It was the Republicans that held millions of Americans hostage. Read the article. It comes from a right wing site. Just one that's honest.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Do you really want to see "hostage taking"?

Unemployment benefits: not until Bush tax cuts pass, Senate GOP says - CSMonitor.com

The lame-duck Congress, mired in a partisan clash over taxes and spending and preoccupied with a battle over extending the Bush tax cuts, refused Wednesday to restore federal financing of extended unemployment benefits, which had lapsed overnight.

The inaction means the imminent loss of unemployment compensation for some 800,000 out-of-work Americans, with nearly 2 million long-term unemployed expected to be affected by Jan. 1, according to the Labor Department.

---------------------------------------------

See? Obama extended the Bush tax cuts because millions of Americas were being held hostage. Now this isn't coming from some far left rag, but from the Christian Science Monitor. And, it was only a couple of years ago.

Let me get this straight, you are comparing a government locking people up to politicians talking about benefits?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

Do you really want to see "hostage taking"?

Unemployment benefits: not until Bush tax cuts pass, Senate GOP says - CSMonitor.com

The lame-duck Congress, mired in a partisan clash over taxes and spending and preoccupied with a battle over extending the Bush tax cuts, refused Wednesday to restore federal financing of extended unemployment benefits, which had lapsed overnight.

The inaction means the imminent loss of unemployment compensation for some 800,000 out-of-work Americans, with nearly 2 million long-term unemployed expected to be affected by Jan. 1, according to the Labor Department.

---------------------------------------------

See? Obama extended the Bush tax cuts because millions of Americas were being held hostage. Now this isn't coming from some far left rag, but from the Christian Science Monitor. And, it was only a couple of years ago.

I'm sure that given the precedent set in Egypt, we'll see plenty more hostage taking. ( and yes, flat out ignoring your inane efforts to drag the topic back to Bush )

How is that inane? We started all this violence in the Middle East with Iraq. If those regimes were supposed to fall, it would be their people that take them out. Not us. We didn't ask them to fight in our revolution.

It's not about Bush anyway. It's about the Republicans. It was the Republicans that held millions of Americans hostage. Read the article. It comes from a right wing site. Just one that's honest.

Yep, Bush made Iran take hostages during the Carter administration because of the upcoming invasion if Iraq.

You're a fucking moron.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Do you really want to see "hostage taking"?

Unemployment benefits: not until Bush tax cuts pass, Senate GOP says - CSMonitor.com

The lame-duck Congress, mired in a partisan clash over taxes and spending and preoccupied with a battle over extending the Bush tax cuts, refused Wednesday to restore federal financing of extended unemployment benefits, which had lapsed overnight.

The inaction means the imminent loss of unemployment compensation for some 800,000 out-of-work Americans, with nearly 2 million long-term unemployed expected to be affected by Jan. 1, according to the Labor Department.

---------------------------------------------

See? Obama extended the Bush tax cuts because millions of Americas were being held hostage. Now this isn't coming from some far left rag, but from the Christian Science Monitor. And, it was only a couple of years ago.

I'm sure that given the precedent set in Egypt, we'll see plenty more hostage taking. ( and yes, flat out ignoring your inane efforts to drag the topic back to Bush )

How is that inane? We started all this violence in the Middle East with Iraq. If those regimes were supposed to fall, it would be their people that take them out. Not us. We didn't ask them to fight in our revolution.

It's not about Bush anyway. It's about the Republicans. It was the Republicans that held millions of Americans hostage. Read the article. It comes from a right wing site. Just one that's honest.

We were involved in Iran before we were involved in Iraq, was that Bush's fault?

 

[Vel]

I'm sure that given the precedent set in Egypt, we'll see plenty more hostage taking. ( and yes, flat out ignoring your inane efforts to drag the topic back to Bush )

How is that inane? We started all this violence in the Middle East with Iraq. If those regimes were supposed to fall, it would be their people that take them out. Not us. We didn't ask them to fight in our revolution.

It's not about Bush anyway. It's about the Republicans. It was the Republicans that held millions of Americans hostage. Read the article. It comes from a right wing site. Just one that's honest.

Yep, Bush made Iran take hostages during the Carter administration because of the upcoming invasion if Iraq.

You're a fucking moron.

Saved me the effort of pointing that out. Thanks

 

[J.E.D]

From your own link:

The State Department said the money was paid by the nongovernmental organizations where the democracy and rights workers work.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said at a news conference on Capitol Hill Thursday that the Americans were on a plane out.

The International Republican Institute, which had workers among those held in Egypt, said in a statement that it welcomes the decision and is hopeful the charges will be dismissed.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...trial-in-egypt/?test=latestnews#ixzz1nvqQ9PZK

To sum it up; the agencies that the people worked for paid the money and Republican Sen John McCain supports the decision. In other words, you're a hack.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

From your own link:

The State Department said the money was paid by the nongovernmental organizations where the democracy and rights workers work.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said at a news conference on Capitol Hill Thursday that the Americans were on a plane out.

Read more: $5M Paid To Buy Freedom For Rights Workers Held In Egypt | Fox News

To sum it up; the agencies that the people worked for paid the money and Republican Sen John McCain supports the decision. In other words, you're a hack.

You think that because someone said that the people got on a plane that means he agrees with how they got there?

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

From your own link:

The State Department said the money was paid by the nongovernmental organizations where the democracy and rights workers work.

Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said at a news conference on Capitol Hill Thursday that the Americans were on a plane out.

The International Republican Institute, which had workers among those held in Egypt, said in a statement that it welcomes the decision and is hopeful the charges will be dismissed.

Read more: $5M Paid To Buy Freedom For Rights Workers Held In Egypt | Fox News

In other words, you're a hack.

And those NGO's are funded by whom? One guess.....

Our govt. Which means two things. Our tax dollars were used to buy someone's freedom from a radical govt/group/terrorists.
And secondly the only hack is you.

 

[rdean]

I'm sure that given the precedent set in Egypt, we'll see plenty more hostage taking. ( and yes, flat out ignoring your inane efforts to drag the topic back to Bush )

How is that inane? We started all this violence in the Middle East with Iraq. If those regimes were supposed to fall, it would be their people that take them out. Not us. We didn't ask them to fight in our revolution.

It's not about Bush anyway. It's about the Republicans. It was the Republicans that held millions of Americans hostage. Read the article. It comes from a right wing site. Just one that's honest.

Yep, Bush made Iran take hostages during the Carter administration because of the upcoming invasion if Iraq.

You're a fucking moron.

Shut up shithole. Who even mentioned Carter and we didn't invade Iran. Besides, you fucking idiot shithole, Americans and the British brought down the first Democratic government in the Middle East and replaced it with the Shah of Iran. You didn't even know that, did you fuckstain. I'm so tired of your ignorance. Go get some education. It's not for snobs like your leader says. It's for everyone. So they won't be a fucktard like you obviously are.