A US Marine Speaks Out

[TheOne]

article

Paul Hollrah, a former State Representative (R), District
8, Oklahoma. He also served as a member of the Electoral College in 2000 also finds the Kerry Heinz Tide Foundation connection. Quoting Urbanlegends.com proves nothing more than your Janes Military Digest Site. You say Jane's Military site is used by the Pentagon, but what about a Republican State Senator's conclusions.

I give up. You won't accept snopes, urbanlegends.com or any source that may refute your claims. These sites rely on their unbiased nature. Without that, they are worthless. You continually discredit any of my sources. Hollrah is not a State Senator, he never was a State Senator, he is a former congressman and his e-mail was completely debunked by the research done at urbanlegends.com. There are links that prove this without a doubt. Like the Complete List of Heinz Endowments Grants to Tides included in the link I gave you. You were duped by a falacious e-mail and it was proven falacious.

You may not be aware, but I too was employed for several time periods as an agent of the Intergalactic police force, Mannniwaaee III of the Milky Way Galaxy. We use only reliable sources for our information. Like direct observation instead of relying on Janes Military Digest.

Really, the following site is used by most intelligence services around the world. Even more than Janes Military Digest.

http://www.therockalltimes.co.uk/2002/06/24/israel-bans.html

In a surprise move, Israel has banned news channels CNN, BBC, Sky and ABC from all its domestic TV on the grounds of "unreasonable bias", and has instead signed up Fox television and the UK's Channel 5 to provide programming for its citizens.

The perfectly reasonable response is thought to stem from comments made by the notoriously parochial and thoughtless founder of CNN, Ted Turner. Turner said in a recent interview that he felt Israel and Palestine were terrorising each other.

The millionaire — who wasn't previously known to be an anti-Semite — subsequently apologised for taking a balanced view, but to no avail.

A review by Israeli authorities, lead by moderate prime minister Ariel Sharon, revealed that CNN had been force-feeding Palestinian propaganda to the world and as such needed to have several Apaches send missiles through its windows. Fortunately, its headquarters in the US are beyond the helicopters' range.

However, Israeli officials were surprised to find that most other organisations had also been corrupted by Muslim insurgents and that most were guilty of flagrant anti-Israeli bias.

As such, they have all been banned in favour of less-threatening content. Fox is known to be more responsive to countries that have lots of money and Channel 5 shows nothing but pornography and police chase video shows, so a renewed sense of balance and understanding in the Middle East is likely to result from the tough but fair decision.

What's the sarcasm for? Are you comparing a joke site to Jane's Military Digest? For some odd reason, you still don't beleive Jane's is a respected, unbiased source of information. You are just flat wrong on this.

As fighting looms, eyes turn to Jane's

Leading trade publication for the business of war

By Jamie L. Jones

Jane’s Defence Weekly is, strictly speaking, a business-to-business publication.
The business is war.
When military operations and foreign intelligence become everyone’s business, everyone from CIA spooks to the mainstream press looks to the British trade title for the latest in military and intelligence news.
Jane’s Defence Weekly is one of several trade titles that provide information and news to the military, intelligence, defense and transport communities, and as one would expect, these same communities are the source of much of the publication's reporting, which in turn makes it a must-read for journalists attempting a quick bone-up on the Afghanistan situation.

-snip-

Beal says that Jane’s Defence Weekly maintains its objectivity through a strict policy of impartiality—no easy task for a magazine that could be read by both President Bush and Osama bin Laden.

-snip

article

Remember that I said all sources including the US State Department, the Pentagon and my own sites are biased.

I SAID ALL OF THEM.....

If I can't use respected sources to support my positions, then I really don't see the need in debating with you further. It will just be a chain of me proving you wrong with respected sources and you discounting them all as "biased". We need to be able to support our claims and know the difference between partisan, propaganda spewing sources and solid, respected sources of information. I won't use MoveOn.org or any other left wing site and seriously expect you to accept them, but when I link the US State Department and Jane's Defense, I expect that we both can agree to the quality of the source.

This is getting tiresome.

 

[DKSuddeth]

theone, ajwps has his agenda and beliefs and they are as unshakeable as the dalai lama. don't sweat it.

 

[ajwps]

theone, ajwps has his agenda and beliefs and they are as unshakeable as the dalai lama. don't sweat it.

WELL SAID....

And Dillodick and yourself have your opinions, agendas and beliefs open to any proposition that does not agree with your own concrete opinions. Thank you for comparing me to the peaceful non-racist loving Dali Lama. That is a great compliment.

Thats what this forum seems to be all about. No one is convinced of anything but they are exposed to other points of view even if they are unacceptable to the mindset you pose.

 

[dilloduck]

I guess I'll just assume there was an insult in there somewhere.

:scratch:

 

[ajwps]

I guess I'll just assume there was an insult in there somewhere.

Enjoy the insult as you assume it to be, before you learn its real cost.

:wank:

 

[dilloduck]

and the cost is ?

 

[ajwps]

I give up......... This is getting tiresome.

For some reason you are also becoming tiring. You seem to feel that Janes Military Digest is the one true unbiased, accurate and error free source of military and general information necessary for corporate integration.

Your obviously ignoring the fact that all sources of information of any kind are totally biased.

Take care and enjoy your Janes Military Digest while reality proves to be a bit more accurate than some packaged off the shelf information service.