A terrorist detonates an atomic bomb or releases weaponized Ebola in a US City

If you execute someone for an act of terrorism or execute them for murder...What is the difference?

The OBVIOUS answer to your libtard question is the ensuing POLITICAL THEATRICS. By bringing KSM, and the other terrorists to NY and face a a Costly Civil trial (estimated to be AT LEAST $75 million plus), when they have ALREADY CONFESSED and have ALREADY acquiesced to be executed, Obami Salami, and his semi-criminal stooge Holder want to denigrate the Bush Adm by having these terrorists, in effect, try Bush, the CIA etc.

Which country were you raised in? Obviously you have some marxist ideology that believes if someone confessed or agreed to a sentence that no formal trial is necessary.

In our country, the greatest nation on earth, KSM will be read the charges against him and will be asked if he pleads guilty or not guilty. If he feels he is guilty like you say he does, he will make a guilty plea and save us $75 mil
 
If you execute someone for an act of terrorism or execute them for murder...What is the difference?

The OBVIOUS answer to your libtard question is the ensuing POLITICAL THEATRICS. By bringing KSM, and the other terrorists to NY and face a a Costly Civil trial (estimated to be AT LEAST $75 million plus), when they have ALREADY CONFESSED and have ALREADY acquiesced to be executed, Obami Salami, and his semi-criminal stooge Holder want to denigrate the Bush Adm by having these terrorists, in effect, try Bush, the CIA etc.

Which country were you raised in? Obviously you have some marxist ideology that believes if someone confessed or agreed to a sentence that no formal trial is necessary.

In our country, the greatest nation on earth, KSM will be read the charges against him and will be asked if he pleads guilty or not guilty. If he feels he is guilty like you say he does, he will make a guilty plea and save us $75 mil

So a military tribunal is only fit for soldiers. Gotcha
 
What should he be charged with?

I will not go with the rational answers, for in this political climate, it is inutterable heresy to say such things.

The Obama Administration answers would be:

Place the "facts" in a blender, call it "protocol." Then

charge "the individual with anger management problems associated with the long U.S. history of oppression" (we must remember never to say the politically incorrect term, "terrorist," afterall) with

"arson" and/or "vandalism" for detonating the nuclear device

or

"disorderly conduct" for releasing Ebola.
 
It sort of depends Frank. If it is nuclear in Detroit, we here in Michigan would call it urban renewal. Gov. Granholm would probably give them a tax credit if they filmed it.
 
If you execute someone for an act of terrorism or execute them for murder...What is the difference?

The OBVIOUS answer to your libtard question is the ensuing POLITICAL THEATRICS. By bringing KSM, and the other terrorists to NY and face a a Costly Civil trial (estimated to be AT LEAST $75 million plus), when they have ALREADY CONFESSED and have ALREADY acquiesced to be executed, Obami Salami, and his semi-criminal stooge Holder want to denigrate the Bush Adm by having these terrorists, in effect, try Bush, the CIA etc.

Which country were you raised in? Obviously you have some marxist ideology that believes if someone confessed or agreed to a sentence that no formal trial is necessary.

In our country, the greatest nation on earth, KSM will be read the charges against him and will be asked if he pleads guilty or not guilty. If he feels he is guilty like you say he does, he will make a guilty plea and save us $75 mil

What PLANET were you raised in ? If a person has already confessed and agrees to be executed (for the purpose of boinking 72 virgins, or whatever) in a legitimate formal trial, i.e., Military Tribunal for enemy terrorists of America with whom we are at war, then why else would the Marxist Muslim PC protector Obami Salami want to make the switch ?

Obviously, it's the reason I gave in my other post....AND the fact that it is becoming more and more evident that the Muslim appeasing Obami Salami wants to convince the Muslim World that since there isn't much he can politically do about pardoning this scum, that he is STILL giving them a shot PLUS a chance to denigrate the Bush Adm and the CIA with Political Theatrics.

WHY ????? Why do you Libtards try to weasel out of something so egregious as a President of the USA bending over backwards to fuck America and appease the Islamofascist Swine ?????

Granted that you Libtards are already an established "Blame America, First, Last and in-between" bunch of crazies...... But does America really deserve such a vicious hatred ?
 
If you catch the person/persons that did this you better make sure that he wasn't treated unfairly by the NYPD. You better make sure that his rights weren't violated in any way.That he wasn't treated too harshly. In fact if he was read his Miranda rights in a surly tone that might be grounds for dismissal if the ACLU had it's way.
I think it probably would be in everybody's best interest to wave a finger in his face and say very sternly.
"Bad Bad Bad terrorist", and then send him on his way after asking him not to do this again. Please.

This way the Libs will be happy and Obama would not have to apologize for America being such a bad country.
 
Do American Libruls exist to serve any other purpose than to act as sock puppets for Jihadists and Marxists?
 
The OBVIOUS answer to your libtard question is the ensuing POLITICAL THEATRICS. By bringing KSM, and the other terrorists to NY and face a a Costly Civil trial (estimated to be AT LEAST $75 million plus), when they have ALREADY CONFESSED and have ALREADY acquiesced to be executed, Obami Salami, and his semi-criminal stooge Holder want to denigrate the Bush Adm by having these terrorists, in effect, try Bush, the CIA etc.

Which country were you raised in? Obviously you have some marxist ideology that believes if someone confessed or agreed to a sentence that no formal trial is necessary.

In our country, the greatest nation on earth, KSM will be read the charges against him and will be asked if he pleads guilty or not guilty. If he feels he is guilty like you say he does, he will make a guilty plea and save us $75 mil

What PLANET were you raised in ? If a person has already confessed and agrees to be executed (for the purpose of boinking 72 virgins, or whatever) in a legitimate formal trial, i.e., Military Tribunal for enemy terrorists of America with whom we are at war, then why else would the Marxist Muslim PC protector Obami Salami want to make the switch ?

Obviously, it's the reason I gave in my other post....AND the fact that it is becoming more and more evident that the Muslim appeasing Obami Salami wants to convince the Muslim World that since there isn't much he can politically do about pardoning this scum, that he is STILL giving them a shot PLUS a chance to denigrate the Bush Adm and the CIA with Political Theatrics.

WHY ????? Why do you Libtards try to weasel out of something so egregious as a President of the USA bending over backwards to fuck America and appease the Islamofascist Swine ?????

Granted that you Libtards are already an established "Blame America, First, Last and in-between" bunch of crazies...... But does America really deserve such a vicious hatred ?

What has become of the once proud American system of education?

In what system does a defendant "agree to be executed"?
How does your system of justice work? Waterboard a guy 183 times until he confesses and agrees to be executed? Thankfully, the US system of justice is above all that. He will be brought to trial in the US not some secret backwater enclave. He will be tried by the US Government with a jury composed of the very same people he attacked.
ALL evidence against him will be presented and some of it will be thrown out. Based on that evidence, a lawfully selected jury will decide his fate.

That is how a properly executed legal system works
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-22tna7KHzI

250,000 count of murder?

700,000 counts attempted murder?

Violating a smoking ordinance?

Salivating, aren't you?

Raising the alarm and awareness is simply NOT the same thing as salivating over the prospect of the dire problem being referenced.

It takes a special kind of liberoidal assmonkey to make that kind of sub-moronic "mistake."

Giving a warning about the stupidity being shown by our illustrious President and his dopey Attorney General is NOT akin to hoping for the death of hundreds of thousand of people. It remains, simply, a warning.

Of course, there are numerous liberoidal assmonkeys who are too singularly stupid to grasp any of this. It surprises nobody that you are in that category.
 
Nothing, you fool!

It's an act of war.

So what, we hold him in a POW camp until the war's over and then turn him loose, kind of like Lincoln did with the Confederate prisoners?

Yeah, I wonder why gun stores can't keep ammo on their shelves.

Not a dimes worth of difference between Libruls and Jihadists.

A post ago you said the guy should NOT be charged with a crime, because it was not a criminal act, it was an act of war.

Thus, if he committed an act of war that was not criminal, then he's a POW.
 
So what, we hold him in a POW camp until the war's over and then turn him loose, kind of like Lincoln did with the Confederate prisoners?

Yeah, I wonder why gun stores can't keep ammo on their shelves.

Not a dimes worth of difference between Libruls and Jihadists.

A post ago you said the guy should NOT be charged with a crime, because it was not a criminal act, it was an act of war.

Thus, if he committed an act of war that was not criminal, then he's a POW.

Are you saying (or is it your belief that) all POWs get released to just go home at the end of hostilities?

Or, in your most informed opinion, is it possible that there may be a class of POWs who -- for one reason or another -- are not permitted to "just go home" at the end of hostilities?

By the way, there is mighty good reason not to classify non-uniformed illegal enemy combatants as "POWs" either, but for the sake of the current discussion only, let's go ahead and use that incorrect terminology.
 
Conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, use of a weapon of mass destruction, destruction by explosive (in the atomic bomb case) and first degree murder of however many people were killed as a result would be the starting point. Just like they charged McVeigh. Believe it or not, there are lots of laws in place against such activity and thus many charges against it that come with death penalty sentences. Acts of war, by definition, are committed by nations.

Aside from what the courts would charge him with, Crusader and his ilk would be pissing themselves with glee. They're just praying for another terrorist attack.
 
Last edited:
Conspiracy to use a weapon of mass destruction, use of a weapon of mass destruction, destruction by explosive (in the atomic bomb case) and first degree murder of however many people were killed as a result would be the starting point. Just like they charged McVeigh. Believe it or not, there are lots of laws in place against such activity and thus many charges against it. Acts of war, by centuries old definitions, are committed by nations.

Aside from what the courts would charge him with, Crusader and his ilk would be pissing themselves with glee. They're just praying for another terrorist attack.

Why do you use McVeigh? McVeigh was a domestic, a citizen. These people however are not. McVey was a special case in of himself, and his actions.

To continually use McVeigh is intentionally blurring the lines of distinction between a citizen, and a foreign national.
 
Last edited:

Forum List

Back
Top