A Tea Party of Stalinists

Bfgrn

Gold Member
Apr 4, 2009
16,829
2,492
245
When the ‘tea partiers’ say “we want our country back”, what do they mean by ‘our’?

What polls show us about the ‘tea party’ is that they are a fringe group diametrically opposed to mainstream America. Among all Americans, George W. Bush has a 27/58 positive/negative favorable rating. Among the ‘tea party’ he's viewed favorably, 57/27. An almost perfect diametrical difference.

Is there any precedent in history of today’s the ‘tea party’?

The answer is YES…a parallel to the 'Tea Party" occurred in Russia in the late 1980's. Russian conservatives, the Stalinists, wanted 'their' country back. It was an alliance including xenophobic fringe groups and nationalists who yearned for what they saw as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.

And like today’s ‘tea partiers’, they wanted their authoritarian government back.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 27, 1989

Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies

MOSCOW, Feb. 26— Russian conservatives, uneasy with the liberalization of Soviet society under Mikhail S. Gorbachev, have seized on the country's experiment in more democratic elections as a chance to fight for a return to more authoritarian ways.

While many candidates and voters say they view the elections to the new Congress of Deputies as a way to further the candor and freedoms allowed by the Soviet leader, conservatives in this city and around the country were boasting last week that they had already succeeded in blocking the nomination of several prominent people regarded as liberals.

A Disparate Alliance

The conservatives are a disparate alliance, including xenophobic fringe groups, like Pamyat, as well as large numbers of less extreme nationalists who yearn for what they see as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.



Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I bet Bfgrn has never even read the constitution based on how backwards he or she has the tea party position.
 
LOl, when the hell has the Tea Party ever said they want "their Guberment back"?

I've heard of people saying they want their country back from the Progressives Commies who run the Guberment and the people who foolishly vote for them.

what a stupid thread.:lol:
 
LOl, when the hell has the Tea Party ever said they want "their Guberment back"?

I've heard of people saying they want their country back from the Progressives Commies who run the Guberment and the people who foolishly vote for them.

what a stupid thread.:lol:

Stupid and Bfgrn are like peanut butter and jelly
 
LOl, when the hell has the Tea Party ever said they want "their Guberment back"?

I've heard of people saying they want their country back from the Progressives Commies who run the Guberment and the people who foolishly vote for them.

what a stupid thread.:lol:

Slogans
The focus of the electioneering is most often to raise opposition to popular, ''liberal'' candidates, who, the speakers and listeners say, pose a danger to Soviet society.

But most of the conservative Russians interviewed said elections for the new congress present a timely opportunity to raise the visibility of their cause by urging voters away from progressive candidates and toward conservatives, and by winning the support of the nominees themselves.

--------------------------------------------------

Oh, I forgot that the 'word bound' pea brain coalition would be here like flies on shit.

So WORDS explain it, and mere coincidence...Two groups of right wing fringe elements, one in Russia and one in America, that didn't exist WHILE their authoritarian leaders were RUNNING the government of their country suddenly wanted their COUNTRY back. So the fact that in both countries liberals and progressives were elected to run the government of their COUNTRY has no connection...
 
When the ‘tea partiers’ say “we want our country back”, what do they mean by ‘our’?

What polls show us about the ‘tea party’ is that they are a fringe group diametrically opposed to mainstream America. Among all Americans, George W. Bush has a 27/58 positive/negative favorable rating. Among the ‘tea party’ he's viewed favorably, 57/27. An almost perfect diametrical difference.

Is there any precedent in history of today’s the ‘tea party’?

The answer is YES…a parallel to the 'Tea Party" occurred in Russia in the late 1980's. Russian conservatives, the Stalinists, wanted 'their' country back. It was an alliance including xenophobic fringe groups and nationalists who yearned for what they saw as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.

And like today’s ‘tea partiers’, they wanted their authoritarian government back.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 27, 1989

Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies

MOSCOW, Feb. 26— Russian conservatives, uneasy with the liberalization of Soviet society under Mikhail S. Gorbachev, have seized on the country's experiment in more democratic elections as a chance to fight for a return to more authoritarian ways.

While many candidates and voters say they view the elections to the new Congress of Deputies as a way to further the candor and freedoms allowed by the Soviet leader, conservatives in this city and around the country were boasting last week that they had already succeeded in blocking the nomination of several prominent people regarded as liberals.

A Disparate Alliance

The conservatives are a disparate alliance, including xenophobic fringe groups, like Pamyat, as well as large numbers of less extreme nationalists who yearn for what they see as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.

At election rallies where speakers call out against the influence of ''Zionist forces,'' and in campaign leaflets decrying ''liberal yellow journalists,'' representatives of politically conservative organizations are trying to draft voters and candidates to establish a foothold within the Government.



Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies

what did you whining libturds mean when you said it?? doyasuppose?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LOl, when the hell has the Tea Party ever said they want "their Guberment back"?

I've heard of people saying they want their country back from the Progressives Commies who run the Guberment and the people who foolishly vote for them.

what a stupid thread.:lol:

avatar19448_25.gif


Stupid and Bfgrn are like peanut butter and jelly

Here is what is revealed when we remove Crusader's face shield...

Crusader Frank wants HIS authoritarian leader back...

bush-crusader.jpg
 
Last edited:
LOl, when the hell has the Tea Party ever said they want "their Guberment back"?

I've heard of people saying they want their country back from the Progressives Commies who run the Guberment and the people who foolishly vote for them.

what a stupid thread.:lol:

avatar19448_25.gif


Stupid and Bfgrn are like peanut butter and jelly

Here is what is revealed when we remove Crusader's face shield...

Crusader Frank wants HIS authoritarian leader back...

bush-crusader.jpg

Good riddance to the Compassionate Statist.

Bush gave us Alito and Roberts and for that I'm grateful...hmmm, and he did drop the first bomb of the War on the ChiCom built Telco facility on Kabul, so that was cool too.
 
avatar19448_25.gif


Stupid and Bfgrn are like peanut butter and jelly

Here is what is revealed when we remove Crusader's face shield...

Crusader Frank wants HIS authoritarian leader back...

bush-crusader.jpg

Good riddance to the Compassionate Statist.

Bush gave us Alito and Roberts and for that I'm grateful...hmmm, and he did drop the first bomb of the War on the ChiCom built Telco facility on Kabul, so that was cool too.

Thanks for being so frank Crusader...SO, you support all of Bush's authoritarianism and appointments of Judges that protect the oligarchy, it's only when Bush professed his false 'compassion' and acted human-like that you say 'Good riddance'

Another way of saying...Crusader Frank wants HIS authoritarian leader back...
 
Here is what is revealed when we remove Crusader's face shield...

Crusader Frank wants HIS authoritarian leader back...

bush-crusader.jpg

Good riddance to the Compassionate Statist.

Bush gave us Alito and Roberts and for that I'm grateful...hmmm, and he did drop the first bomb of the War on the ChiCom built Telco facility on Kabul, so that was cool too.

Thanks for being so frank Crusader...SO, you support all of Bush's authoritarianism and appointments of Judges that protect the oligarchy, it's only when Bush professed his false 'compassion' and acted human-like that you say 'Good riddance'

Another way of saying...Crusader Frank wants HIS authoritarian leader back...

I said I liked Alito and Roberts, reading comprehension not your strong suit?
 
When the ‘tea partiers’ say “we want our country back”, what do they mean by ‘our’?

What polls show us about the ‘tea party’ is that they are a fringe group diametrically opposed to mainstream America. Among all Americans, George W. Bush has a 27/58 positive/negative favorable rating. Among the ‘tea party’ he's viewed favorably, 57/27. An almost perfect diametrical difference.

Is there any precedent in history of today’s the ‘tea party’?

The answer is YES…a parallel to the 'Tea Party" occurred in Russia in the late 1980's. Russian conservatives, the Stalinists, wanted 'their' country back. It was an alliance including xenophobic fringe groups and nationalists who yearned for what they saw as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.

And like today’s ‘tea partiers’, they wanted their authoritarian government back.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 27, 1989

Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies

MOSCOW, Feb. 26— Russian conservatives, uneasy with the liberalization of Soviet society under Mikhail S. Gorbachev, have seized on the country's experiment in more democratic elections as a chance to fight for a return to more authoritarian ways.

While many candidates and voters say they view the elections to the new Congress of Deputies as a way to further the candor and freedoms allowed by the Soviet leader, conservatives in this city and around the country were boasting last week that they had already succeeded in blocking the nomination of several prominent people regarded as liberals.

A Disparate Alliance

The conservatives are a disparate alliance, including xenophobic fringe groups, like Pamyat, as well as large numbers of less extreme nationalists who yearn for what they see as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.



Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies

This is some of the most amateur political analysis I've ever read.

But what if it's true? The United States of America will fall in 20 years.

Fuckin' GREAT. Get New White America STARTED, beeyotch!
 
The Tea Baggers can be your friend, as long as you agree with EVERYTHING that they do. If not...well, ask anyone in the GOP what happens.
 
The Tea Baggers can be your friend, as long as you agree with EVERYTHING that they do. If not...well, ask anyone in the GOP what happens.

They don't like being called "Teabaggers", but they obviously believe that corporate America's scrotum tastes like Freedom®.
 
SO, you support all of Bush's authoritarianism and appointments of Judges that protect the oligarchy,
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Bfgrn learned him a new word.
Oligarchy!!
:clap2:

Funny that you would use that word to describe the Bush admin. when it SO much better fits Bam-Bam and his little circle of Soros, Emanuel, et.al....

:lol:
 
When the ‘tea partiers’ say “we want our country back”, what do they mean by ‘our’?

What polls show us about the ‘tea party’ is that they are a fringe group diametrically opposed to mainstream America. Among all Americans, George W. Bush has a 27/58 positive/negative favorable rating. Among the ‘tea party’ he's viewed favorably, 57/27. An almost perfect diametrical difference.

Is there any precedent in history of today’s the ‘tea party’?

The answer is YES…a parallel to the 'Tea Party" occurred in Russia in the late 1980's. Russian conservatives, the Stalinists, wanted 'their' country back. It was an alliance including xenophobic fringe groups and nationalists who yearned for what they saw as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.

And like today’s ‘tea partiers’, they wanted their authoritarian government back.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 27, 1989

Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies

MOSCOW, Feb. 26— Russian conservatives, uneasy with the liberalization of Soviet society under Mikhail S. Gorbachev, have seized on the country's experiment in more democratic elections as a chance to fight for a return to more authoritarian ways.

While many candidates and voters say they view the elections to the new Congress of Deputies as a way to further the candor and freedoms allowed by the Soviet leader, conservatives in this city and around the country were boasting last week that they had already succeeded in blocking the nomination of several prominent people regarded as liberals.

A Disparate Alliance

The conservatives are a disparate alliance, including xenophobic fringe groups, like Pamyat, as well as large numbers of less extreme nationalists who yearn for what they see as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.



Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies
What a useful idiot you are bfgrn. Communist "conservatives" were looking to preserve hardline Stalinist regime standards... or at least Brehznev levels of oppression not Glasnost.

But with your level of delusion... why am I surprised.
 
When the ‘tea partiers’ say “we want our country back”, what do they mean by ‘our’?

What polls show us about the ‘tea party’ is that they are a fringe group diametrically opposed to mainstream America. Among all Americans, George W. Bush has a 27/58 positive/negative favorable rating. Among the ‘tea party’ he's viewed favorably, 57/27. An almost perfect diametrical difference.

Is there any precedent in history of today’s the ‘tea party’?

The answer is YES…a parallel to the 'Tea Party" occurred in Russia in the late 1980's. Russian conservatives, the Stalinists, wanted 'their' country back. It was an alliance including xenophobic fringe groups and nationalists who yearned for what they saw as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.

And like today’s ‘tea partiers’, they wanted their authoritarian government back.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

February 27, 1989

Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies

MOSCOW, Feb. 26— Russian conservatives, uneasy with the liberalization of Soviet society under Mikhail S. Gorbachev, have seized on the country's experiment in more democratic elections as a chance to fight for a return to more authoritarian ways.

While many candidates and voters say they view the elections to the new Congress of Deputies as a way to further the candor and freedoms allowed by the Soviet leader, conservatives in this city and around the country were boasting last week that they had already succeeded in blocking the nomination of several prominent people regarded as liberals.

A Disparate Alliance

The conservatives are a disparate alliance, including xenophobic fringe groups, like Pamyat, as well as large numbers of less extreme nationalists who yearn for what they see as the simple values of Old Russia and the Orthodox church.



Soviet Conservatives Try to Turn Back the Clock on Gorbachev's Policies
What a useful idiot you are bfgrn. Communist "conservatives" were looking to preserve hardline Stalinist regime standards... or at least Brehznev levels of oppression not Glasnost.

But with your level of delusion... why am I surprised.

Your stupidity is so deeply rooted that 'delusion' would be a major upgrade.

Do you have an inability to comprehend what a Communist "conservatives" is? Why am I not surprised? It is the combination of your stupidity and your parochial indoctrination that fills your little pea with concrete.

Try to answer this question... WHAT values, traditions and orthodoxy would a person born and raised in Russia want to 'conserve'? Capitalism? Free markets? Individual rights?


Conservatism is based on latitude, longitude and date of birth.
Me
 
From my perspective, the bulk of the tea partiers are simply sore losers from the 2008 Presidential election.
 

Forum List

Back
Top