A tale of 2 protests

They shouldn't have called themselves "Occupiers." That name only incites hostility and violence. These organizers made a big mistake labeling themselves that way. It set the wrong tone. Violence was inevitable and i think many of these "Occupiers" wanted it that way. It's sad.
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #4
So, what does that have to do with the police doing nothing about rioting masses who actually were committing violent acts at Penn State?

And beating peaceful protesters at Berkeley with nightsticks, on the word of FoxNews, that they might cause trouble?
 
So, what does that have to do with the police doing nothing about rioting masses who actually were committing violent acts at Penn State?

And beating peaceful protesters at Berkeley with nightsticks, on the word of FoxNews, that they might cause trouble?

Take it up with your Berkeley pals. They're all loony Socialists/Progressives too no? Why did Socialists/Progressives at Berkeley turn on their own this way? You should ask them. Not too many "Evil Conservatives" at Berkeley last i checked. They attacked their own for nothing? Seems like that's an internal problem for you guys to hash out yourselves. Good luck and let us know how it all turned out.
 
Berkeley is certainly no bastion for "Evil Conservatives." It is for Socialist/Progressive nutters though. So these actions were obviously taken for a reason. Something bad had to have happened. And i'm pretty sure the OP has good reason to omit things that aren't convenient. Why would Socialists/Progressives at Berkeley turn on their own?
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #8
Take it up with your Berkeley pals. They're all loony Socialists/Progressives too no? Why did Socialists/Progressives at Berkeley turn on their own this way? You should ask them. Not too many "Evil Conservatives" at Berkeley last i checked. They attacked their own for nothing? Seems like that's an internal problem for you guys to hash out yourselves. Good luck and let us know how it all turned out.

That would be due to the fact that you don't understand the nature of the term "Progressive", you don't understand that right-wingers can also be facists, and you don't understand the members of OWA (who are much more on the anarchist side of Liberal than the progressive side of Liberal) at all.

Perhaps you should read a few things, learn a few things, and find out what the real differences are between the four main points of the current political spectrum. They are as follows:

bothaxes.gif
 
  • Thread starter
  • Banned
  • #9
Berkeley is certainly no bastion for "Evil Conservatives." It is for Socialist/Progressive nutters though. So these actions were obviously taken for a reason. Something bad had to have happened. And i'm pretty sure the OP has good reason to omit things that aren't convenient. Why would Socialists/Progressives at Berkeley turn on their own?

What does the makeup of the population of Berkeley have to do with the makeup of the police force that was there that day?

I challenge you to find any police force in the United States that is made up of Liberals. Because there isn't one. Anywhere.
 
Berkeley is certainly no bastion for "Evil Conservatives." It is for Socialist/Progressive nutters though. So these actions were obviously taken for a reason. Something bad had to have happened. And i'm pretty sure the OP has good reason to omit things that aren't convenient. Why would Socialists/Progressives at Berkeley turn on their own?

What does the makeup of the population of Berkeley have to do with the makeup of the police force that was there that day?

I challenge you to find any police force in the United States that is made up of Liberals. Because there isn't one. Anywhere.

Berkeley. Challenge met. There are very few if any "Evil Conservatives" in that area and you should know that. So why did Socialists/Progressives decide to turn on their own? What caused this to happen? This is your problem not mine. I'm Paul and this is between yall.
 
They shouldn't have called themselves "Occupiers." That name only incites hostility and violence. These organizers made a big mistake labeling themselves that way. It set the wrong tone. Violence was inevitable and i think many of these "Occupiers" wanted it that way. It's sad.

Wait? What? Are you actually a supporter of Ron Paul or just full of shit? If you actually are a supporter of Ron Paul you would support a person's First Amendment right to Free Speech and Assembly regardless of their message. But you denounce them as "loony Socialists/Progressives" and try to justify government violating their rights. So really you're just another partisan hack who Ron Paul would shun.
 
They shouldn't have called themselves "Occupiers." That name only incites hostility and violence. These organizers made a big mistake labeling themselves that way. It set the wrong tone. Violence was inevitable and i think many of these "Occupiers" wanted it that way. It's sad.

Wait? What? Are you actually a supporter of Ron Paul or just full of shit? If you actually are a supporter of Ron Paul you would support a person's First Amendment right to Free Speech and Assembly regardless of their message. But you denounce them as "loony Socialists/Progressives" and try to justify government violating their rights. So really you're just another partisan hack who Ron Paul would shun.

Obviously i didn't say any of those things. Of course i support their right to Free Speech and Assembly. I was just pointing out that they did make a mistake calling themselves "Occupiers." The label just incites hostility and violence. And i think many of these "Occupiers" wanted violence. Hence the label. I was also pointing out that Berkeley is certainly no bastion for "Crazed Right Wingers." This is a case of Socialists/Progressives turning on their own. Why it happened,i don't know. Ask the Berkeley officials i guess.
 

Forum List

Back
Top