A Study Offers Clues...will conservatives deny the science?

Warming Shmarming....

Can anyone out there possibly defend pumping more pollution in to our environment?

Cleaner is better. The rest shouldn't matter. It's common courtesy... WE should be willing to give up profits in the now so that our kids have less of a mess in the future. And it's not like those to whom the profits in question matter the most couldn't stand to loose a few pounds.

Yes, we all want cleaner fuel.
It's just that the technology isn't there yet. We are getting there, it's just going to take about 15 or 20 years (maybe a little less) but we will get cheap and cleaner fuel, just not right now.
Forcing the ones that we have now (like solar and wind) is just too expensive and most do not really work very well.

Bullshit. If the horse and buggy lobby had nearly the influence that carbon based transportation has today the streets would have stunk through the 60's.

I say we favor NO industry in our tax code. Not one. No special treatment in the tax code at all. Fair and simple taxes.

I agree government should not be in it at all. Tax dollars should not be pushing the science exploration of alternative energy.
 
A Study Offers Clues on a California fault's mystery...will conservatives deny the science?

Seriously. The media is reporting (damn them) that scientists (damn liberals) are again using terms like new method of modeling and may now understand why to make a case for earthquake science.

The key terms that should alarm conservatives are contained in the statement "data collected by sensors on the ground and in space and combining them with observations from laboratory physics experiments, Caltech researchers conducted a computer simulation..."

Sounds too much like the scientific arguments backing global warming. :eusa_whistle:


A new modeling method
has helped Caltech researchers better understand why the Parkfield segment of the San Andreas fault has been behaving oddly in recent years.

Quake study offers new clues on a California fault's mystery - latimes.com

your flirtation with sanity is apparently over... :rolleyes:
 
Did you read post # 18?
To blame pollution only and not ask why the whole system is changing is pretty blind ideology.

Yes to believe reality is totally blind ideology

So what is your theory, as to why all of our planets climates are changing ?

We have only one planet, and the reason that we are seeing a rapid increase in the temperature of the atmosphere and ocean can be found here;

The Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Effect

Not that I expect you to actually read real science, but for others, that is an article from the American Institute of Physics, the largest scientific society of physicists in the world.
 
Any other scientists research that oppose the EPA about CO2 is not Worthy of discussion?

http://www.co2science.org/education/book/2011/55BenefitsofCO2Pamphlet.pdf

Can't possibly be that the rise in CO2 just might be protecting us from the changes that are taking place in our solar system.

It is still not being discussed as to why all of our planets atmospheres are changing and that it might be the cause of why we are having dramatic changes in our weather along with more and more quakes, volcanic eruptions, stronger storms.
To just blame mans pollution and not take in the whole picture is pretty one sided.
 
Dante, if you actually wanted to have an honest discussion about the Calif. fault line, you should not have started it with an insult about conservatives who are the majority of this nation, who do believe in science and want a discussion about opposing views.

My question about the change in our solar system had to do with the puzzling behavior of the fault.

The report you posted said taking data from the ground and in space.
 
Last edited:
We have only one planet, and the reason that we are seeing a rapid increase in the temperature of the atmosphere and ocean can be found here;

No rocks, what can be found there is a piss poor hypothesis that is neither supported, nor predicted by the laws of physics.
 
This could be bad news for the enviro-terrorists who want us to stop drilling for oil. If we find a reason for all the rumbling, what does this do to the theory that fracking has increased the number of earth quakes?

Could be a lot of wailing and knashing of teeth at the Sierra Club...
 
This could be bad news for the enviro-terrorists who want us to stop drilling for oil. If we find a reason for all the rumbling, what does this do to the theory that fracking has increased the number of earth quakes?

Could be a lot of wailing and knashing of teeth at the Sierra Club...

its been proven that fracking causes earth quakes
 
This could be bad news for the enviro-terrorists who want us to stop drilling for oil. If we find a reason for all the rumbling, what does this do to the theory that fracking has increased the number of earth quakes?

Could be a lot of wailing and knashing of teeth at the Sierra Club...

its been proven that fracking causes earth quakes

No it hasn't

DOI: 'No evidence' fracking causes earthquakes | Campaign 2012 | Washington Examiner
 
Here's a little perspective. Obama adviser and political guru Bill Ayers is responsible for more deaths than the last earthquake in the US to cause fatalities in 2003.
 
So come back when you aren't so clueless

The worst thing that has happened to science since the onset of the AGW hoax is that it seems that now it is acceptable to confuse corelation with causation. Nothing like hard evidence exists that proves that fracking causes earthquakes.

Hell, at this point, we aren't exactly sure what triggers earthquakes so to point at a particular thing, when any number of things might be responsible is just stupid.
 
So come back when you aren't so clueless

The worst thing that has happened to science since the onset of the AGW hoax is that it seems that now it is acceptable to confuse corelation with causation. Nothing like hard evidence exists that proves that fracking causes earthquakes.

Hell, at this point, we aren't exactly sure what triggers earthquakes so to point at a particular thing, when any number of things might be responsible is just stupid.

Someone who thinks reality is a hoax like youreslf should be sent to institutions for being insane
 
Ohio Earthquake Linked To Fracking Injection Wells | ThinkProgress
^4.0 earthquake in Ohio caused by fracking

USGS Report: Link Between Fracking and Oklahoma Earthquakes | Crooks and Liars
^Fracking responsible for earthquakes/
^Fracking linked to Oklahoma’s historic 5.6 earthquake.
^Fracking responsible for around 50 earthquakes in Oklahoma alone during a year.

So come back when you aren't so clueless


HOLY MOTHER OF GOD:eek:


ok.......about 2 years ago, I officially awarded "Chris" on here the number 1 mental case on the whole US MessageBoard. And everybody kinda figured nobody would come along who is more of a k00k. Then about 2 or 3 months ago, this starcraft guy comes along.

Chris........you've been saved s0n............we've found a guy who would be very comfortable walking naked down Main Street shaking a bannana at people!!!


Ummmm..............hey star.........dont make any plans to be a parent huh???!!!!
 
Last edited:
This could be bad news for the enviro-terrorists who want us to stop drilling for oil. If we find a reason for all the rumbling, what does this do to the theory that fracking has increased the number of earth quakes?

Could be a lot of wailing and knashing of teeth at the Sierra Club...

its been proven that fracking causes earth quakes



s0n........I dropped a 60 pound boulder in my yard this past weekend. When should I expect to feel the ground moving, and approximately what kind of magnitude are we talking? Also.......is a tsunami likely? ANd what about aftershocks?
 
This could be bad news for the enviro-terrorists who want us to stop drilling for oil. If we find a reason for all the rumbling, what does this do to the theory that fracking has increased the number of earth quakes?

Could be a lot of wailing and knashing of teeth at the Sierra Club...

its been proven that fracking causes earth quakes

s0n........I dropped a 60 pound boulder in my yard this past weekend. When should I expect to feel the ground moving, and approximately what kind of magnitude are we talking? Also.......is a tsunami likely? ANd what about aftershocks?

You should acutally go to the docrors and ask them to check when your brain will beign to start thinkinh
 
Ohio Earthquake Linked To Fracking Injection Wells | ThinkProgress
^4.0 earthquake in Ohio caused by fracking

USGS Report: Link Between Fracking and Oklahoma Earthquakes | Crooks and Liars
^Fracking responsible for earthquakes/
^Fracking linked to Oklahoma’s historic 5.6 earthquake.
^Fracking responsible for around 50 earthquakes in Oklahoma alone during a year.

So come back when you aren't so clueless


HOLY MOTHER OF GOD:eek:


ok.......about 2 years ago, I officially awarded "Chris" on here the number 1 mental case on the whole US MessageBoard. And everybody kinda figured nobody would come along who is more of a k00k. Then about 2 or 3 months ago, this starcraft guy comes along.

Chris........you've been saved s0n............we've found a guy who would be very comfortable walking naked down Main Street shaking a bannana at people!!!


Ummmm..............hey star.........dont make any plans to be a parent huh???!!!!

Shit you being ingnorant measn i should not be a parent
 
A Study Offers Clues on a California fault's mystery...will conservatives deny the science?

Seriously. The media is reporting (damn them) that scientists (damn liberals) are again using terms like new method of modeling and may now understand why to make a case for earthquake science.

The key terms that should alarm conservatives are contained in the statement "data collected by sensors on the ground and in space and combining them with observations from laboratory physics experiments, Caltech researchers conducted a computer simulation..."

Sounds too much like the scientific arguments backing global warming. :eusa_whistle:


A new modeling method
has helped Caltech researchers better understand why the Parkfield segment of the San Andreas fault has been behaving oddly in recent years.

Quake study offers new clues on a California fault's mystery - latimes.com

your flirtation with sanity is apparently over... :rolleyes:

okie dokie boy genius,



:lol:
 

Forum List

Back
Top